Utility of the Venous Excess Ultrasound (VEXUS) score to track dynamic change in volume status in patients undergoing fluid removal during haemodialysis - the ACUVEX study.

Fluid overload Renal replacement therapy Ultrasound Venous congestion

Journal

The ultrasound journal
ISSN: 2524-8987
Titre abrégé: Ultrasound J
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101742146

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 03 12 2023
accepted: 21 02 2024
medline: 28 3 2024
pubmed: 28 3 2024
entrez: 28 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The use of ultrasound assessment, including the Venous Excess Ultrasound (VEXUS) score, is increasingly being utilised as part of fluid status assessment in clinical practice. We aimed to evaluate the ability of the VEXUS score to track fluid removal during the course of the dialysis session and explore the relationship between traditional measures of fluid status and venous congestion. Single-centre, observational study in patients undergoing intermittent haemodialysis, who presented above their target dry weight. Patients had serial assessment using VEXUS, lung ultrasound and selected echocardiographic measures, before, during and after fluid removal. Amongst 33 patients analysed, 5 (15%) had an elevated VEXUS score (> 0). There was no difference in starting weight, dry weight or amount of fluid removed in patients with a normal VEXUS score and those with an elevated VEXUS score. In all patients with elevated VEXUS scores, the degree of venous congestion improved during the course of fluid removal. All patients with an elevated VEXUS score had evidence of both right and left ventricular systolic impairment. In patients with ESRF undergoing haemodialysis, the incidence of venous congestion as measured by the VEXUS is low. In patients with elevated VEXUS scores, removal of fluid through haemodialysis improves the venous congestion score. The pattern of LV and RV systolic dysfunction suggests that VEXUS may be a reflection of cardiac failure rather than venous volume status. Ethical approval was provided by South Central-Berkshire Research and Ethics Committee and registered on clinicaltrials.org (IRAS305720). ISRCTN14351189 - Retrospectively registered on 30/11/2023.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The use of ultrasound assessment, including the Venous Excess Ultrasound (VEXUS) score, is increasingly being utilised as part of fluid status assessment in clinical practice. We aimed to evaluate the ability of the VEXUS score to track fluid removal during the course of the dialysis session and explore the relationship between traditional measures of fluid status and venous congestion.
METHODS METHODS
Single-centre, observational study in patients undergoing intermittent haemodialysis, who presented above their target dry weight. Patients had serial assessment using VEXUS, lung ultrasound and selected echocardiographic measures, before, during and after fluid removal.
RESULTS RESULTS
Amongst 33 patients analysed, 5 (15%) had an elevated VEXUS score (> 0). There was no difference in starting weight, dry weight or amount of fluid removed in patients with a normal VEXUS score and those with an elevated VEXUS score. In all patients with elevated VEXUS scores, the degree of venous congestion improved during the course of fluid removal. All patients with an elevated VEXUS score had evidence of both right and left ventricular systolic impairment.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
In patients with ESRF undergoing haemodialysis, the incidence of venous congestion as measured by the VEXUS is low. In patients with elevated VEXUS scores, removal of fluid through haemodialysis improves the venous congestion score. The pattern of LV and RV systolic dysfunction suggests that VEXUS may be a reflection of cardiac failure rather than venous volume status.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
Ethical approval was provided by South Central-Berkshire Research and Ethics Committee and registered on clinicaltrials.org (IRAS305720).
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
ISRCTN14351189 - Retrospectively registered on 30/11/2023.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38538806
doi: 10.1186/s13089-024-00370-9
pii: 10.1186/s13089-024-00370-9
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

23

Subventions

Organisme : European Society of Intensive Care Medicine
ID : Established researcher award

Informations de copyright

© 2024. Crown.

Références

Malbrain ML, Marik PE, Witters I, Cordemans C, Kirkpatrick AW, Roberts DJ et al (2014) Fluid overload, de-resuscitation, and outcomes in critically ill or injured patients: a systematic review with suggestions for clinical practice. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 46(5):361–380
doi: 10.5603/AIT.2014.0060 pubmed: 25432556
Acheampong A, Vincent JL (2015) A positive fluid balance is an independent prognostic factor in patients with sepsis. Crit Care 19(1):251
doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0970-1 pubmed: 26073560 pmcid: 4479078
National Heart L, Blood Institute P, Early Treatment of Acute Lung Injury Clinical, Trials N, Shapiro NI, Douglas IS, Brower RG et al (2023) Early restrictive or liberal Fluid Management for Sepsis-Induced Hypotension. N Engl J Med 388(6):499–510
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2212663
Vaara ST, Korhonen AM, Kaukonen KM et al (2012) Fluid overload is associated with an increased risk for 90-day mortality in critically ill patients with renal replacement therapy: data from the prospective FINNAKI study. Crit Care. ;16
Hoste EA, Maitland K, Brudney CS, Mehta R, Vincent JL, Yates D et al (2014) Four phases of intravenous fluid therapy: a conceptual model. Br J Anaesth 113(5):740–747
doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu300 pubmed: 25204700
Silversides JA, Major E, Ferguson AJ, Mann EE, McAuley DF, Marshall JC et al (2017) Conservative fluid management or deresuscitation for patients with sepsis or acute respiratory distress syndrome following the resuscitation phase of critical illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 43(2):155–170
doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4573-3 pubmed: 27734109
Pfortmueller CA, Dabrowski W, Malbrain M (2023) Fluid de-resuscitation in critical illness - A journey into uncertain territory. J Crit Care. :154249
Beaubien-Souligny W, Rola P, Haycock K, Bouchard J, Lamarche Y, Spiegel R et al (2020) Quantifying systemic congestion with Point-Of-Care ultrasound: development of the venous excess ultrasound grading system. Ultrasound J 12(1):16
doi: 10.1186/s13089-020-00163-w pubmed: 32270297 pmcid: 7142196
Andrei S, Bahr PA, Nguyen M, Bouhemad B, Guinot PG (2023) Prevalence of systemic venous congestion assessed by venous excess Ultrasound Grading System (VExUS) and association with acute kidney injury in a general ICU cohort: a prospective multicentric study. Crit Care 27(1):224
doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04524-4 pubmed: 37291662 pmcid: 10249288
Spiegel R, Teeter W, Sullivan S, Tupchong K, Mohammed N, Sutherland M et al (2020) The use of venous doppler to predict adverse kidney events in a general ICU cohort. Crit Care 24(1):615
doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03330-6 pubmed: 33076961 pmcid: 7574322
Malbrain M, Martin G, Ostermann M (2022) Everything you need to know about deresuscitation. Intensive Care Med 48(12):1781–1786
doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06761-7 pubmed: 35932335 pmcid: 9362613
Kalantar-Zadeh K, Lockwood MB, Rhee CM, Tantisattamo E, Andreoli S, Balducci A et al (2022) Patient-centred approaches for the management of unpleasant symptoms in kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol 18(3):185–198
doi: 10.1038/s41581-021-00518-z pubmed: 34980890
Koratala A, Reisinger N (2021) POCUS for nephrologists: Basic principles and a General Approach. Kidney360 2(10):1660–1668
doi: 10.34067/KID.0002482021 pubmed: 35372985 pmcid: 8785785
Mongodi S, De Luca D, Colombo A, Stella A, Santangelo E, Corradi F et al (2021) Quantitative lung Ultrasound: technical aspects and clinical applications. Anesthesiology 134(6):949–965
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003757 pubmed: 33819339
Denault A, Couture EJ, De Medicis E, Shim JK, Mazzeffi M, Henderson RA et al (2022) Perioperative Doppler ultrasound assessment of portal vein flow pulsatility in high-risk cardiac surgery patients: a multicentre prospective cohort study. Br J Anaesth 129(5):659–669
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.07.053 pubmed: 36184294
Guinot PG, Bahr PA, Andrei S, Popescu BA, Caruso V, Mertes PM et al (2022) Doppler study of portal vein and renal venous velocity predict the appropriate fluid response to diuretic in ICU: a prospective observational echocardiographic evaluation. Crit Care 26(1):305
doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04180-0 pubmed: 36199091 pmcid: 9535945
Cheong I, Amador EDO, Gomez RA, Vilarino FMA, Furche MA, Tamagnone FM (2023) Evaluating the utility of Portal Vein Pulsatility Index for detecting fluid unresponsiveness in the Intensive Care Unit. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth
Koratala A, Reisinger N (2022) Point of Care Ultrasound in Cirrhosis-Associated Acute kidney Injury: Beyond Inferior Vena Cava. Kidney360 3(11):1965–1968
doi: 10.34067/KID.0005522022 pubmed: 36514396 pmcid: 9717633
Koratala A, Reisinger N (2022) Venous excess Doppler Ultrasound for the nephrologist: pearls and pitfalls. Kidney Med 4(7):100482
doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2022.100482 pubmed: 35707749 pmcid: 9190062
Alexiadis G, Panagoutsos S, Roumeliotis S, Stibiris I, Markos A, Kantartzi K et al (2017) Comparison of multiple fluid status assessment methods in patients on chronic hemodialysis. Int Urol Nephrol 49(3):525–532
doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1473-y pubmed: 27943170
Rivas-Lasarte M, Maestro A, Fernandez-Martinez J, Lopez-Lopez L, Sole-Gonzalez E, Vives-Borras M et al (2020) Prevalence and prognostic impact of subclinical pulmonary congestion at discharge in patients with acute heart failure. ESC Heart Fail 7(5):2621–2628
doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12842 pubmed: 32633473 pmcid: 7524099
Rola P, Miralles-Aguiar F, Argaiz E, Beaubien-Souligny W, Haycock K, Karimov T et al (2021) Clinical applications of the venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) score: conceptual review and case series. Ultrasound J 13(1):32
doi: 10.1186/s13089-021-00232-8 pubmed: 34146184 pmcid: 8214649
Rihl MF, Pellegrini JAS, Boniatti MM (2023) VExUS score in the management of patients with acute kidney Injury in the Intensive Care Unit: AKIVEX Study. J Ultrasound Med
Longino A, Martin K, Leyba K, Siegel G, Gill E, Douglas IS et al (2023) Correlation between the VExUS score and right atrial pressure: a pilot prospective observational study. Crit Care 27(1):205
doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04471-0 pubmed: 37237315 pmcid: 10223840
Longino A, Martin K, Leyba K, Siegel G, Thai TN, Riscinti M et al (2023) Prospective evaluation of venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) for estimation of venous congestion. Chest

Auteurs

Adrian Wong (A)

Department of Critical Care, King's College Hospital, London, UK. avkwong@mac.com.

Olusegun Olusanya (O)

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK.

Jim Watchorn (J)

Intensive Care Department, Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading, UK.

Kate Bramham (K)

Department of Women and Children's Health and Centre for Urology, Nephrology and Transplantation, King's College Hospital, London, UK.

Sam Hutchings (S)

Department of Critical Care, King's College Hospital, London, UK.

Classifications MeSH