Trends in the use of neuromuscular blocking agents, reversal agents and neuromuscular transmission monitoring: a single-centre retrospective cohort study.

Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) Neuromuscular transmission (NMT) monitoring Reversal agents for NMBAs

Journal

Perioperative medicine (London, England)
ISSN: 2047-0525
Titre abrégé: Perioper Med (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101609072

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 14 04 2022
accepted: 22 03 2024
medline: 28 3 2024
pubmed: 28 3 2024
entrez: 28 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Residual neuromuscular blockade (rNMB) remains a persistent and preventable problem, with serious risks. Our objective was to describe and assess patterns in the use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs), neuromuscular transmission (NMT) monitoring, and factors associated with the use of sugammadex. We performed a retrospective, observational cohort study based on electronic medical records in a large teaching hospital in the Netherlands that introduced an integrated NMT monitoring module with automatic recording in 2017. A total of 22,000 cases were randomly selected from all surgeries between January 2015 and December 2019 that required endotracheal intubation with the use of an NMBA. A total of 14,592 cases fulfilled all the inclusion criteria for complete analyses. Relative NMBA usage remained the same over time. For rocuronium, spontaneous reversal decreased from 86 to 81%, sugammadex reversal increased from 12 to 18%. There was a decline in patients extubated in the operating room (OR) with neither documented NMT monitoring nor sugammadex-mediated reversal from 46 to 31%. The percentage of patients extubated in the OR without a documented train-of-four ratio ≥ 0.9, decreased from 77 to 56%. Several factors were independently associated with the use of sugammadex, including BMI > 30 kg/m Our data demonstrate that the implementation of NMT monitoring with automatic recording coincides with a gradual increase in the (documented) use of NMT monitoring and an increased use of sugammadex with a more precise dose. Factors associated with sugammadex use include higher age, ASA score, BMI, abdominal and thoracic surgery, higher rocuronium doses, emergency surgery and the use of NMT monitoring. Trial registration N/A. • Introduction of NMT monitoring with automatic recording coincides with an increase in (documented) use of NMT monitoring. • Sugammadex is more frequently used in patients with a presumed higher a priori risk of pulmonary complications. • Despite increased NMT monitoring and use of sugammadex a significant percentage of patients remain at potential risk of rNMB.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Residual neuromuscular blockade (rNMB) remains a persistent and preventable problem, with serious risks.
METHODS METHODS
Our objective was to describe and assess patterns in the use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs), neuromuscular transmission (NMT) monitoring, and factors associated with the use of sugammadex. We performed a retrospective, observational cohort study based on electronic medical records in a large teaching hospital in the Netherlands that introduced an integrated NMT monitoring module with automatic recording in 2017. A total of 22,000 cases were randomly selected from all surgeries between January 2015 and December 2019 that required endotracheal intubation with the use of an NMBA. A total of 14,592 cases fulfilled all the inclusion criteria for complete analyses.
RESULTS RESULTS
Relative NMBA usage remained the same over time. For rocuronium, spontaneous reversal decreased from 86 to 81%, sugammadex reversal increased from 12 to 18%. There was a decline in patients extubated in the operating room (OR) with neither documented NMT monitoring nor sugammadex-mediated reversal from 46 to 31%. The percentage of patients extubated in the OR without a documented train-of-four ratio ≥ 0.9, decreased from 77 to 56%. Several factors were independently associated with the use of sugammadex, including BMI > 30 kg/m
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Our data demonstrate that the implementation of NMT monitoring with automatic recording coincides with a gradual increase in the (documented) use of NMT monitoring and an increased use of sugammadex with a more precise dose. Factors associated with sugammadex use include higher age, ASA score, BMI, abdominal and thoracic surgery, higher rocuronium doses, emergency surgery and the use of NMT monitoring. Trial registration N/A.
KEY POINTS CONCLUSIONS
• Introduction of NMT monitoring with automatic recording coincides with an increase in (documented) use of NMT monitoring. • Sugammadex is more frequently used in patients with a presumed higher a priori risk of pulmonary complications. • Despite increased NMT monitoring and use of sugammadex a significant percentage of patients remain at potential risk of rNMB.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38539254
doi: 10.1186/s13741-024-00382-y
pii: 10.1186/s13741-024-00382-y
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

22

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Berg H, Roed J, Viby-Mogensen J, Mortensen CR, Engbaek J, Skovgaard LT, et al. Residual neuromuscular block is a risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications. A prospective, randomised, and blinded study of postoperative pulmonary complications after atracurium, vecuronium and pancuronium. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1997;41(9):1095–103.
doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04851.x pubmed: 9366929
Blobner M, Hunter JM, Meistelman C, Hoeft A, Hollmann MW, Kirmeier E, et al. Use of a train-of-four ratio of 0.95 versus 0.9 for tracheal extubation: an exploratory analysis of POPULAR data. Br J Anaesth. 2020;124(1):63–72.
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.08.023 pubmed: 31607388
Bowman WC. Neuromuscular block. Br J Pharmacol. 2006;147(Suppl 1):S277–86.
pubmed: 16402115 pmcid: 1760749
Bruintjes MH, van Helden EV, Braat AE, Dahan A, Scheffer GJ, van Laarhoven CJ, et al. Deep neuromuscular block to optimize surgical space conditions during laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2017;118(6):834–42.
doi: 10.1093/bja/aex116 pubmed: 28575335
Cammu G. Residual Neuromuscular Blockade and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications: What Does the Recent Evidence Demonstrate? Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2020:1–6.
Canet J, Sabaté S, Mazo V, Gallart L, de Abreu MG, Belda J, et al. Development and validation of a score to predict postoperative respiratory failure in a multicentre European cohort: A prospective, observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015;32(7):458–70.
doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000223 pubmed: 26020123
Dubovoy TZ, Saager L, Shah NJ, Colquhoun DA, Mathis MR, Kapeles S, et al. Utilization Patterns of Perioperative Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal in the United States: A Retrospective Observational Study From the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group. Anesth Analg. 2020;131(5):1510–9.
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005080 pubmed: 33079874 pmcid: 7593983
Eikermann M, Groeben H, Hüsing J, Peters J. Accelerometry of adductor pollicis muscle predicts recovery of respiratory function from neuromuscular blockade. Anesthesiology. 2003;98(6):1333–7.
doi: 10.1097/00000542-200306000-00006 pubmed: 12766640
Eikermann M, Vogt FM, Herbstreit F, Vahid-Dastgerdi M, Zenge MO, Ochterbeck C, et al. The predisposition to inspiratory upper airway collapse during partial neuromuscular blockade. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175(1):9–15.
doi: 10.1164/rccm.200512-1862OC pubmed: 17023729
Fuchs-Buder T, Wilder-Smith OH, Borgeat A, Tassonyi E. Interaction of magnesium sulphate with vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth. 1995;74(4):405–9.
doi: 10.1093/bja/74.4.405 pubmed: 7734259
Grabitz SD, Rajaratnam N, Chhagani K, Thevathasan T, Teja BJ, Deng H, et al. The Effects of Postoperative Residual Neuromuscular Blockade on Hospital Costs and Intensive Care Unit Admission: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Anesth Analg. 2019;128(6):1129–36.
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004028 pubmed: 31094777
Jellish WS, Brody M, Sawicki K, Slogoff S. Recovery from neuromuscular blockade after either bolus and prolonged infusions of cisatracurium or rocuronium using either isoflurane or propofol-based anesthetics. Anesth Analg. 2000;91(5):1250–5.
pubmed: 11049917
Kirmeier E, Eriksson LI, Lewald H, Jonsson Fagerlund M, Hoeft A, Hollmann M, et al. Post-anaesthesia pulmonary complications after use of muscle relaxants (POPULAR): a multicentre, prospective observational study. Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7(2):129–40.
doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30294-7 pubmed: 30224322
Kotake Y, Ochiai R, Suzuki T, Ogawa S, Takagi S, Ozaki M, et al. Reversal with sugammadex in the absence of monitoring did not preclude residual neuromuscular block. Anesth Analg. 2013;117(2):345–51.
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182999672 pubmed: 23757472
Martini C, Boon M, Olofsen E, Bash L, Dahan A. Determinants for reversal versus spontaneous recovery of neuromuscular blockade following general anesthesia in a university center in the Netherlands: a retrospective observational study. Toronto, Canada: IARS; 2021.
Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Avram MJ, Greenberg SB, Marymont JH, Vender JS, et al. Intraoperative acceleromyography monitoring reduces symptoms of muscle weakness and improves quality of recovery in the early postoperative period. Anesthesiology. 2011;115(5):946–54.
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182342840 pubmed: 21946094
Nemes R, Fulesdi B, Pongracz A, Asztalos L, Szabo-Maak Z, Lengyel S, et al. Impact of reversal strategies on the incidence of postoperative residual paralysis after rocuronium relaxation without neuromuscular monitoring: A partially randomised placebo controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017;34(9):609–16.
doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000585 pubmed: 28030444
Pongrácz A, Szatmári S, Nemes R, Fülesdi B, Tassonyi E. Reversal of neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex at the reappearance of four twitches to train-of-four stimulation. Anesthesiology. 2013;119(1):36–42.
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318297ce95 pubmed: 23665915
Saager L, Maiese EM, Bash LD, Meyer TA, Minkowitz H, Groudine S, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and consequences of residual neuromuscular block in the United States: The prospective, observational, multicenter RECITE-US study. J Clin Anesth. 2019;55:33–41.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.12.042 pubmed: 30594097
Schaller SJ, Fink H, Ulm K, Blobner M. Sugammadex and neostigmine dose-finding study for reversal of shallow residual neuromuscular block. Anesthesiology. 2010;113(5):1054–60.
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181f4182a pubmed: 20885293
Söderström CM, Eskildsen KZ, Gätke MR, Staehr-Rye AK. Objective neuromuscular monitoring of neuromuscular blockade in Denmark: an online-based survey of current practice. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2017;61(6):619–26.
doi: 10.1111/aas.12907 pubmed: 28573656
Thomsen JLD, Mathiesen O, Hägi-Pedersen D, Skovgaard LT, Østergaard D, Gätke MR. Improving neuromuscular monitoring and reducing residual neuromuscular blockade via e-learning: A multicentre interrupted time-series study (INVERT study). Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022;66(5):580–8.
doi: 10.1111/aas.14038 pubmed: 35122234 pmcid: 9541262
van der Ploeg T, Austin PC, Steyerberg EW. Modern modelling techniques are data hungry: a simulation study for predicting dichotomous endpoints. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:137.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-137 pubmed: 25532820 pmcid: 4289553
Viby-Mogensen J. Postoperative residual curarization and evidence-based anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2000;84(3):301–3.
doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013428 pubmed: 10793585
Viby-Mogensen J, Engbaek J, Eriksson LI, Gramstad L, Jensen E, Jensen FS, et al. Good clinical research practice (GCRP) in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1996;40(1):59–74.
doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1996.tb04389.x pubmed: 8904261
Viby-Mogensen J, Jørgensen BC, Ording H. Residual curarization in the recovery room. Anesthesiology. 1979;50(6):539–41.
doi: 10.1097/00000542-197906000-00014 pubmed: 156513
Watts RW, London JA, van Wijk RM, Lui YL. The influence of unrestricted use of sugammadex on clinical anaesthetic practice in a tertiary teaching hospital. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2012;40(2):333–9.
doi: 10.1177/0310057X1204000218 pubmed: 22417030
Wulf H, Ledowski T, Linstedt U, Proppe D, Sitzlack D. Neuromuscular blocking effects of rocuronium during desflurane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane anaesthesia. Can J Anaesth. 1998;45(6):526–32.
doi: 10.1007/BF03012702 pubmed: 9669005
Xará D, Santos A, Abelha F. Adverse respiratory events in a post-anesthesia care unit. Arch Bronconeumol. 2015;51(2):69–75.
doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2014.04.016 pubmed: 24974136

Auteurs

Piet Krijtenburg (P)

Department of Anesthesiology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Piet.Krijtenburg@radboudumc.nl.

Arjen de Boer (A)

Department of Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Lori D Bash (LD)

Centre for Observational and Real-World Evidence (CORE), Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.

Gert Jan Scheffer (GJ)

Department of Anesthesiology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Christiaan Keijzer (C)

Department of Anesthesiology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Michiel C Warlé (MC)

Department of Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH