Novel Approaches for the Treatment of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: A Systematic Review of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Interventions and Insights from Clinical Trials.

NIBS PTSD TMS non-invasive brain stimulation post-traumatic stress disorder psychotherapy tDCS transcranial direct-current stimulation transcranial magnetic stimulation

Journal

Brain sciences
ISSN: 2076-3425
Titre abrégé: Brain Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101598646

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 02 02 2024
revised: 20 02 2024
accepted: 22 02 2024
medline: 28 3 2024
pubmed: 28 3 2024
entrez: 28 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

First-line treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) encompass a wide range of pharmacotherapies and psychotherapies. However, many patients fail to respond to such interventions, highlighting the need for novel approaches. Due to its ability to modulate cortical activity, non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) could represent a valuable therapeutic tool. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to summarize and discuss the existing evidence on the ameliorative effects of NIBS on PTSD and comorbid anxiety and depressive symptoms. Our goal is also to debate the effectiveness of an integrated approach characterized by the combination of NIBS and psychotherapy. This search was conducted following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines in the PubMed, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, PSYINDEX, MEDLINE, and ERIC databases. Overall, 31 studies met the eligibility criteria, yielding a total of 26 clinical trials employing transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and 5 making use of transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS). From these studies, it emerged that NIBS consistently reduced overall PTSD symptoms' severity as well as comorbid anxiety and depressive symptoms. Moreover, we speculate that combining NIBS with prolonged exposure or cognitive processing therapy might represent a promising therapeutic approach for consistently ameliorating subjects' clinical conditions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38539599
pii: brainsci14030210
doi: 10.3390/brainsci14030210
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Daniele Saccenti (D)

Department of Psychology, Sigmund Freud University, 20143 Milan, Italy.

Leandro Lodi (L)

Department of Psychology, Sigmund Freud University, 20143 Milan, Italy.

Andrea Stefano Moro (AS)

Department of Psychology, Sigmund Freud University, 20143 Milan, Italy.
Center for Behavioral Neuroscience and Communication (BNC), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.

Simona Scaini (S)

Department of Psychology, Sigmund Freud University, 20143 Milan, Italy.
Child and Youth Lab, Sigmund Freud University of Milan, Via Ripa di Porta Ticinese 77, 20143 Milan, Italy.

Barbara Forresi (B)

Department of Psychology, Sigmund Freud University, 20143 Milan, Italy.

Jacopo Lamanna (J)

Center for Behavioral Neuroscience and Communication (BNC), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Faculty of Psychology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.

Mattia Ferro (M)

Department of Psychology, Sigmund Freud University, 20143 Milan, Italy.
Center for Behavioral Neuroscience and Communication (BNC), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.

Classifications MeSH