Double vitrification of embryos adversely affects clinical outcomes.

blastocyst double cryopreservation double vitrification live birth rate

Journal

JBRA assisted reproduction
ISSN: 1518-0557
Titre abrégé: JBRA Assist Reprod
Pays: Brazil
ID NLM: 101684552

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Mar 2024
Historique:
medline: 28 3 2024
pubmed: 28 3 2024
entrez: 28 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To evaluate the impact of double embryo vitrification on clinical outcomes. This retrospective cohort study included data from January 2013 to March 2021. The study group included women aged 33.3±5.7 years with double-vitrified embryos (n=381), while the control group included women aged 32.1±6.7 years with embryos vitrified once (n=780), all transferred at the blastocyst stage. The primary endpoint was live birth rate (LBR), and secondary endpoints included percent positive βHCG test, clinical/ongoing pregnancy rates, miscarriage/biochemical pregnancy rates and birthweight. LBR was significantly lower in double-vitrified embryos (30.2%) than in embryos vitrified once (45.6%, p<.05). Similarly, double-vitrified embryos were associated with significantly lower positive βHCG tests (46% vs. 63.3%, p<.05) and clinical (34.9% vs. 52.2%, p<.05) and ongoing pregnancy (31.3% vs. 47.3%, p<.05) rates compared to embryos vitrified once. However, biochemical pregnancy (double vitrified: 24.1% vs. vitrified once: 17.9%, p>.05) and miscarriage rates (double vitrified: 10.2% vs. vitrified once: 9.4%, p>.05), as well as mean birthweight (double-vitrified embryos: 2950g vs. embryos vitrified once: 2837g, p>.05) did not differ significantly between two groups. On a secondary comparison, amongst double-vitrified embryos, the subgroup that was cultured for more than 24 hours between warming and second vitrification achieved significantly higher positive βHCG tests (49%) and clinical pregnancy (38%) rates, compared to embryos re-vitrified on the same day of warming (31.8% and 20.5%, respectively, p<.05). Nevertheless, LBR did not differ significantly amongst these study-group embryos (embryos that remained in culture for more than 24 hours: 32.2% vs. embryos that were re-vitrified on warming day: 20.5%, p>.05). Double vitrification of embryos adversely affects clinical outcomes. However, it represents a valuable option concerning embryo wastage, with acceptable success rates.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38546119
doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20240014
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Chara Oraiopoulou (C)

Embryology Department, Embryolab Fertility Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Embryolab Academy, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Mary Karagianni (M)

Embryolab Academy, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Achilleas Papatheodorou (A)

Embryology Department, Embryolab Fertility Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Embryolab Academy, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Olga Toumpa (O)

Embryology Department, Embryolab Fertility Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Marianna Papadopoulou (M)

Embryology Department, Embryolab Fertility Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Embryolab Academy, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Nicholaos Christophoridis (N)

Embryolab Academy, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Clinical Department, Embryolab Fertility Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Panagiotis Drakopoulos (P)

Clinical Department, Embryolab Fertility Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Alexia Chatziparasidou (A)

Embryology Department, Embryolab Fertility Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Embryolab Academy, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Classifications MeSH