Differential associations between insight and quality-of-life dimensions among individuals with schizophrenia.


Journal

Rehabilitation psychology
ISSN: 1939-1544
Titre abrégé: Rehabil Psychol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0365337

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Mar 2024
Historique:
medline: 28 3 2024
pubmed: 28 3 2024
entrez: 28 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

In schizophrenia, insight, the recognition that one has a medical illness that requires treatment, has long been related to deteriorated quality of life. Yet, insight and quality of life are broad constructs that encompass several dimensions. Here, we investigated differential associations between insight and quality-of-life dimensions using a psychological network approach. We extracted data from the French network of rehabilitation centers REHABase (January 2016 to December 2022, Insight was negatively associated with quality of life. Our psychological network analysis revealed a strong negative association between awareness of disease and self-esteem. Both dimensions were the strongest nodes in the overall network. Our network analysis also revealed a significant but positive connection between recognition of treatment needs and resilience. While insight and quality of life are overall negatively associated, we found both negative and positive connections between insight and quality-of-life dimensions. The negative relationship between insight and quality of life may reflect the deleterious effects of diagnostic labeling on a patient's self-esteem. Yet, acknowledgment of treatment needs may have positive effects on quality of life and may promote recovery, perhaps because it emphasizes the need for support rather than labels and abnormalities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Identifiants

pubmed: 38546555
pii: 2024-68997-001
doi: 10.1037/rep0000551
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Guillaume Barbalat (G)

Centre Ressource de Rehabilitation Psychosociale et de Remediation Cognitive, Hopital Le Vinatier, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Universite de Lyon.

Lisa Maréchal (L)

Centre de REhabilitation d'Activites Therapeutiques Intersectoriel de la Vienne, Centre Hospitalier Laborit.

Julien Plasse (J)

Centre Ressource de Rehabilitation Psychosociale et de Remediation Cognitive, Hopital Le Vinatier, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Universite de Lyon.

Isabelle Chéreau-Boudet (I)

Centre Referent Conjoint de Rehabilitation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand.

Benjamin Gouache (B)

Centre Referent de Rehabilitation Psychosociale et de Remediation Cognitive, Centre Hospitalier Alpes Isere.

Emilie Legros-Lafarge (E)

Centre Referent de Rehabilitation Psychosociale de Limoges.

Catherine Massoubre (C)

REHALise, Centre de Rehabilitation Psychosociale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne.

Nathalie Guillard-Bouhet (N)

Centre de REhabilitation d'Activites Therapeutiques Intersectoriel de la Vienne, Centre Hospitalier Laborit.

Frédéric Haesebaert (F)

Centre Ressource de Rehabilitation Psychosociale et de Remediation Cognitive, Hopital Le Vinatier, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Universite de Lyon.

Renaud F Cohen (RF)

Centre Universitaire de REmediation Cognitive et Retablissement, Centre Psychotherapique de Nancy.

Nicolas Franck (N)

Centre Ressource de Rehabilitation Psychosociale et de Remediation Cognitive, Hopital Le Vinatier, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Universite de Lyon.

Classifications MeSH