Rediversion of the Failing Ileoanal Pouch: First Step in Pouch Salvage?

complications ileal pouch–anal anastomosis ileostomy inflammatory bowel disease pouch salvage rediversion redo IPAA surgery

Journal

Inflammatory bowel diseases
ISSN: 1536-4844
Titre abrégé: Inflamm Bowel Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9508162

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 09 01 2024
medline: 28 3 2024
pubmed: 28 3 2024
entrez: 28 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is a technically demanding procedure with many potential complications. Rediversion with an ileostomy is often the first step in pouch salvage; however, it may not be clear if an individual patient will undergo subsequent pouch salvage surgery. We aimed to describe the indications and short- and long-term outcomes of rediversion in our pouch registry. We queried our institutional pouch registry for patients who underwent index 2- or 3-stage IPAA and subsequent rediversion at our institution between 1985 and 2022. Pouches constructed elsewhere, rediverted elsewhere, or those patients who underwent pouch salvage/excision without prior rediversion were excluded. Patients were selected for pouch salvage according to the surgeon's discretion. Overall, 177 patients (3.4% of 5207 index pouches) were rediverted. At index pouch, median patient age was 32 years and 50.8% were women. Diagnoses included ulcerative colitis (86.4%), indeterminate colitis (6.2%), familial adenomatous polyposis (4.0%), and others (3.4%). Median time from prior ileostomy closure to rediversion was 7.2 years. Indications for rediversion were inflammatory in 98 (55.4%) and noninflammatory in 79 (44.6%) patients. After rediversion, 52% underwent pouch salvage, 30% had no further surgery, and 18.1% underwent pouch excision. The 5-year pouch survival rates for inflammatory and noninflammatory indications were 71.5% and 94.5%, respectively (P = .02). Rediversion of ileoanal pouches is a safe initial strategy to manage failing pouches and is a useful first step in pouch salvage in many patients. Subsequent salvage surgery for noninflammatory indications had a significantly higher pouch salvage rate than those rediverted for inflammatory complications. Rediversion with an ileostomy was a safe, useful first step in pouch salvage, and subsequent salvage surgery for noninflammatory indications had a significantly higher pouch salvage rate than those rediverted for inflammatory complications.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is a technically demanding procedure with many potential complications. Rediversion with an ileostomy is often the first step in pouch salvage; however, it may not be clear if an individual patient will undergo subsequent pouch salvage surgery. We aimed to describe the indications and short- and long-term outcomes of rediversion in our pouch registry.
METHODS METHODS
We queried our institutional pouch registry for patients who underwent index 2- or 3-stage IPAA and subsequent rediversion at our institution between 1985 and 2022. Pouches constructed elsewhere, rediverted elsewhere, or those patients who underwent pouch salvage/excision without prior rediversion were excluded. Patients were selected for pouch salvage according to the surgeon's discretion.
RESULTS RESULTS
Overall, 177 patients (3.4% of 5207 index pouches) were rediverted. At index pouch, median patient age was 32 years and 50.8% were women. Diagnoses included ulcerative colitis (86.4%), indeterminate colitis (6.2%), familial adenomatous polyposis (4.0%), and others (3.4%). Median time from prior ileostomy closure to rediversion was 7.2 years. Indications for rediversion were inflammatory in 98 (55.4%) and noninflammatory in 79 (44.6%) patients. After rediversion, 52% underwent pouch salvage, 30% had no further surgery, and 18.1% underwent pouch excision. The 5-year pouch survival rates for inflammatory and noninflammatory indications were 71.5% and 94.5%, respectively (P = .02).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Rediversion of ileoanal pouches is a safe initial strategy to manage failing pouches and is a useful first step in pouch salvage in many patients. Subsequent salvage surgery for noninflammatory indications had a significantly higher pouch salvage rate than those rediverted for inflammatory complications.
Rediversion with an ileostomy was a safe, useful first step in pouch salvage, and subsequent salvage surgery for noninflammatory indications had a significantly higher pouch salvage rate than those rediverted for inflammatory complications.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
Rediversion with an ileostomy was a safe, useful first step in pouch salvage, and subsequent salvage surgery for noninflammatory indications had a significantly higher pouch salvage rate than those rediverted for inflammatory complications.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38546722
pii: 7636717
doi: 10.1093/ibd/izae061
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Tairin Uchino (T)

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Eddy P Lincango (EP)

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Oscar Hernandez Dominguez (O)

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Anuradha Bhama (A)

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Emre Gorgun (E)

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Arielle Kanters (A)

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Hermann Kessler (H)

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Jeremy Lipman (J)

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

David Liska (D)

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Joshua Sommovilla (J)

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Michael Valente (M)

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Scott R Steele (SR)

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Tracy Hull (T)

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Stefan D Holubar (SD)

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Classifications MeSH