Transformation scenarios towards multifunctional landscapes: A multi-criteria land-use allocation model applied to Jambi Province, Indonesia.

Farm modeling Land-use composition Landscape design Multi-objective optimization Robust optimization Sustainable land-use

Journal

Journal of environmental management
ISSN: 1095-8630
Titre abrégé: J Environ Manage
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0401664

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 23 10 2023
revised: 03 02 2024
accepted: 19 03 2024
medline: 29 3 2024
pubmed: 29 3 2024
entrez: 28 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

In tropical regions, shifting from forests and traditional agroforestry to intensive plantations generates conflicts between human welfare (farmers' demands and societal needs) and environmental protection. Achieving sustainability in this transformation will inevitably involve trade-offs between multiple ecological and socioeconomic functions. To address these trade-offs, our study used a new methodological approach allowing the identification of transformation scenarios, including theoretical landscape compositions that satisfy multiple ecological functions (i.e., structural complexity, microclimatic conditions, organic carbon in plant biomass, soil organic carbon and nutrient leaching losses), and farmers needs (i.e., labor and input requirements, total income to land, and return to land and labor) while accounting for the uncertain provision of these functions and having an actual potential for adoption by farmers. We combined a robust, multi-objective optimization approach with an iterative search algorithm allowing the identification of ecological and socioeconomic functions that best explain current land-use decisions. The model then optimized the theoretical land-use composition that satisfied multiple ecological and socioeconomic functions. Between these ends, we simulated transformation scenarios reflecting the transition from current land-use composition towards a normative multifunctional optimum. These transformation scenarios involve increasing the number of optimized socioeconomic or ecological functions, leading to higher functional richness (i.e., number of functions). We applied this method to smallholder farms in the Jambi Province, Indonesia, where traditional rubber agroforestry, rubber plantations, and oil palm plantations are the main land-use systems. Given the currently practiced land-use systems, our study revealed short-term returns to land as the principal factor in explaining current land-use decisions. Fostering an alternative composition that satisfies additional socioeconomic functions would require minor changes ("low-hanging fruits"). However, satisfying even a single ecological indicator (e.g., reduction of nutrient leaching losses) would demand substantial changes in the current land-use composition ("moonshot"). This would inevitably lead to a profit decline, underscoring the need for incentives if the societal goal is to establish multifunctional agricultural landscapes. With many oil palm plantations nearing the end of their production cycles in the Jambi province, there is a unique window of opportunity to transform agricultural landscapes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38547822
pii: S0301-4797(24)00696-0
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120710
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

120710

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Volker von Groß (V)

Forest Economics and Sustainable Land-use Planning, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, 37077, Germany. Electronic address: volker.vongross@uni-goettingen.de.

Kibrom T Sibhatu (KT)

International Center of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.

Alexander Knohl (A)

Centre of Biodiversity and Sustainable land-use, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, 37077, Germany; Bioclimatology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, 37077, Germany.

Matin Qaim (M)

Center for Development Research (ZEF), University of Bonn, Bonn, 53113, Germany.

Edzo Veldkamp (E)

Soil Science of Tropical and Subtropical Ecosystems, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, 37077, Germany.

Dirk Hölscher (D)

Centre of Biodiversity and Sustainable land-use, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, 37077, Germany; Tropical Silviculture and Forest Ecology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, 37077, Germany.

Delphine Clara Zemp (DC)

Conservation Biology Lab, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, 2000, Switzerland.

Marife D Corre (MD)

Soil Science of Tropical and Subtropical Ecosystems, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, 37077, Germany.

Ingo Grass (I)

Department of Ecology of Tropical Agricultural Systems, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, 70599, Germany.

Sebastian Fiedler (S)

Ecosystem Modelling, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, 37077, Germany.

Christian Stiegler (C)

Bioclimatology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, 37077, Germany.

Bambang Irawan (B)

Forestry Department, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jambi, Jambi, 36122, Indonesia; Center of Excellence for Land-Use Transformation Systems, University of Jambi, Jambi, 36122, Indonesia.

Leti Sundawati (L)

Department of Forest Management, IPB University, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia.

Kai Husmann (K)

Forest Economics and Sustainable Land-use Planning, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, 37077, Germany.

Carola Paul (C)

Forest Economics and Sustainable Land-use Planning, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, 37077, Germany; Centre of Biodiversity and Sustainable land-use, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, 37077, Germany.

Classifications MeSH