A LAMP point-of-care test to guide antimicrobial choice for treatment of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius pyoderma in dogs.

LAMP Staphylococcus pseudintermedius antimicrobial stewardship diagnosis skin infection veterinary dermatology

Journal

Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)
ISSN: 1532-2971
Titre abrégé: Vet J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9706281

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 10 01 2024
revised: 22 03 2024
accepted: 22 03 2024
medline: 29 3 2024
pubmed: 29 3 2024
entrez: 28 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Staphylococcus pseudintermedius is the most common cause of pyoderma in dogs. We validated a point-of-care (PoC) test based on colorimetric loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for rapid S. pseudintermedius identification and susceptibility testing for first line antimicrobials for systemic treatment of canine pyoderma, i.e., lincosamides, first generation cephalosporins and amoxicillin clavulanate. Newly designed LAMP primers targeting clinically relevant resistance genes were combined with a previously validated set of primers targeting spsL for species identification. After laboratory validation on 110 clinical isolates, we assessed the performance of the test on 101 clinical specimens using routine culture and susceptibility testing as a reference standard. The average hands-on and turnaround times for the PoC test were 30 and 90minutes, respectively. The assay showed sensitivity and specificity near 100% for both species identification and susceptibility testing when performed on bacterial cultures or clinical specimens in the laboratory. However, the PoC test yielded less accurate results when performed on-site by clinical staff (92% sensitivity and 64% specificity for species identification, 67% sensitivity and 96% specificity for β-lactam susceptibility, and 83% sensitivity and 71% specificity for lincosamide susceptibility). These results indicate that the PoC test should be adapted to a user-friendly technology to facilitate performance and interpretation of results by clinical staff. If properly developed, the test would allow veterinarians to gain rapid information on antimicrobial choice, limiting the risk of treatment failure and facilitating adherence to antimicrobial use guidelines in small animal veterinary dermatology.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38547963
pii: S1090-0233(24)00044-3
doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2024.106105
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

106105

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest statement None.

Auteurs

M Pirolo (M)

Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.

M Menezes (M)

Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.

M Poulsen (M)

Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.

V Søndergaard (V)

Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.

P Damborg (P)

Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.

A C Poirier (AC)

Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7AL, UK.

R La Ragione (R)

Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7AL, UK; Department of Microbial Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK.

M Schjærff (M)

Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.

L Guardabassi (L)

Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark. Electronic address: lg@sund.ku.dk.

Classifications MeSH