Exploring the complex interrelation between depressive symptoms, risk, and protective factors: A comprehensive network approach.

Acceptance Depression Network analysis Protective factors Risk factors Stress

Journal

Journal of affective disorders
ISSN: 1573-2517
Titre abrégé: J Affect Disord
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7906073

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 28 09 2023
revised: 19 02 2024
accepted: 23 03 2024
medline: 29 3 2024
pubmed: 29 3 2024
entrez: 28 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Depressive symptoms seem to be interrelated in a complex and self-reinforcing way. To gain a better understanding of this complexity, the inclusion of theoretically relevant constructs (such as risk and protective factors) offers a comprehensive view into the complex mechanisms underlying depression. Cross-sectional data from individuals diagnosed with a major depressive disorder (N = 986) and healthy controls (N = 1049) were analyzed. Participants self-reported their depressive symptoms, as well as several risk factors and protective factors. Regularized partial correlation networks were estimated for each group and compared using a network comparison test. Symptoms of depression were more strongly connected in the network of depressed patients than in healthy controls. Among the risk factors, perceived stress, the experience of negative life events, emotional neglect, and emotional abuse were the most centrally embedded in both networks. However, the centrality of risk factors did not significantly differ between the two groups. Among the protective factors, social support, personal competence, and acceptance were the most central in both networks, where the latter was significantly more strongly associated with the symptom of self-hate in depressed patients. The network analysis revealed that key symptoms of depression were more strongly connected for depressed patients than for healthy controls, and that risk and protective factors play an important role, particularly perceived stress in both groups and an accepting attitude for depressed patients. However, the purpose of this study is hypothesis generating and assisting in the potential selection of non-symptom nodes for future research.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Depressive symptoms seem to be interrelated in a complex and self-reinforcing way. To gain a better understanding of this complexity, the inclusion of theoretically relevant constructs (such as risk and protective factors) offers a comprehensive view into the complex mechanisms underlying depression.
METHODS METHODS
Cross-sectional data from individuals diagnosed with a major depressive disorder (N = 986) and healthy controls (N = 1049) were analyzed. Participants self-reported their depressive symptoms, as well as several risk factors and protective factors. Regularized partial correlation networks were estimated for each group and compared using a network comparison test.
RESULTS RESULTS
Symptoms of depression were more strongly connected in the network of depressed patients than in healthy controls. Among the risk factors, perceived stress, the experience of negative life events, emotional neglect, and emotional abuse were the most centrally embedded in both networks. However, the centrality of risk factors did not significantly differ between the two groups. Among the protective factors, social support, personal competence, and acceptance were the most central in both networks, where the latter was significantly more strongly associated with the symptom of self-hate in depressed patients.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The network analysis revealed that key symptoms of depression were more strongly connected for depressed patients than for healthy controls, and that risk and protective factors play an important role, particularly perceived stress in both groups and an accepting attitude for depressed patients. However, the purpose of this study is hypothesis generating and assisting in the potential selection of non-symptom nodes for future research.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38548192
pii: S0165-0327(24)00543-3
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.03.119
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest We report no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Flavio Iovoli (F)

Osnabrueck University, Germany. Electronic address: flavio.iovoli@gmail.com.

Mila Hall (M)

Osnabrueck University, Germany.

Igor Nenadic (I)

Philipps University of Marburg, Germany.

Benjamin Straube (B)

Philipps University of Marburg, Germany.

Nina Alexander (N)

Philipps University of Marburg, Germany.

Hamidreza Jamalabadi (H)

Philipps University of Marburg, Germany.

Andreas Jansen (A)

Philipps University of Marburg, Germany.

Frederike Stein (F)

Philipps University of Marburg, Germany.

Katharina Brosch (K)

Philipps University of Marburg, Germany.

Florian Thomas-Odenthal (F)

Philipps University of Marburg, Germany.

Paula Usemann (P)

Philipps University of Marburg, Germany.

Lea Teutenberg (L)

Philipps University of Marburg, Germany.

Julia Pfarr (J)

Philipps University of Marburg, Germany.

Katharina Thiel (K)

University of Münster, Germany.

Kira Flinkenflügel (K)

University of Münster, Germany.

Susanne Meinert (S)

University of Münster, Germany.

Dominik Grotegerd (D)

University of Münster, Germany.

Tim Hahn (T)

University of Münster, Germany.

Janik Goltermann (J)

University of Münster, Germany.

Marius Gruber (M)

University of Münster, Germany.

Jonathan Repple (J)

University of Münster, Germany.

Verena Enneking (V)

University of Münster, Germany.

Alexandra Winter (A)

University of Münster, Germany.

Udo Dannlowski (U)

University of Münster, Germany.

Tilo Kircher (T)

Philipps University of Marburg, Germany.

Julian A Rubel (JA)

Osnabrueck University, Germany.

Classifications MeSH