Clinician perspectives on policy approaches to genetic risk disclosure in families.
Ethics
Genetics
Genomics
Policy
Qualitative research
Journal
Familial cancer
ISSN: 1573-7292
Titre abrégé: Fam Cancer
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 100898211
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Mar 2024
28 Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
24
10
2023
accepted:
12
03
2024
medline:
29
3
2024
pubmed:
29
3
2024
entrez:
29
3
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Genomic sequencing has emerged as a powerful tool with significant implications for patients and their relatives, however, empirical evidence suggests that effective dissemination of risk information within families remains a challenge. Policy responses to address this issue vary across countries, with Belgium notably lacking specific regulations governing nondisclosure of genetic risk. In this study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with clinicians from Belgian clinical genetics centers to gain insight into their perspectives on policy approaches to the disclosure of genetic risk within families. Using real-world examples of legislation and court rulings from France, Australia, and the UK, we explored clinician viewpoints on the roles and responsibilities of both patients and clinicians in the family communication process. Clinicians expressed confusion regarding what was legally permissible regarding contacting at-risk relatives. While there was a consensus among participants that patients have a responsibility to inform their at-risk relatives, participants were hesitant to support the legal enforcement of this duty. Clinicians mostly recognized some responsibility to at-risk relatives, but the extent of this responsibility was a subject of division. Our findings highlight the need for a comprehensive policy that clarifies the roles and responsibilities of clinicians and patients to inform at-risk relatives. Furthermore, the study underscores the practical challenges clinicians face in supporting patients through the complex process of family communication, suggesting a need for additional resources and the exploration of alternative approaches to communication.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38548926
doi: 10.1007/s10689-024-00375-2
pii: 10.1007/s10689-024-00375-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council
ID : 101057721
Organisme : HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council
ID : 101057721
Organisme : KU Leuven
ID : C14/18/089
Organisme : KU Leuven
ID : C14/18/089
Organisme : Onderzoeksraad, KU Leuven
ID : PDMT2/23/074
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
Références
Menko FH et al The uptake of presymptomatic genetic testing in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer and Lynch syndrome: a systematic review of the literature and implications for clinical practice, Familial Cancer, vol. 18, no. 1. Springer Netherlands, pp. 127–135, 15-Jan-2019
Menko FH et al (Aug. 2020) The uptake of predictive DNA testing in 40 families with a pathogenic BRCA1/BRCA2 variant. An evaluation of the proband-mediated procedure. Eur J Hum Genet 28(8):1020
Taylor S, Rodrigues M, Poke G, Wake S, McEwen A (2019) Family communication following a diagnosis of myotonic dystrophy: To tell or not to tell? J. Genet. Couns, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1029–1041, Oct
Pedrazzani C et al (2021) Dec., Genetic Literacy and Communication of Genetic Information in Families Concerned with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: A Cross-Study Comparison in Two Countries and within a Timeframe of More Than 10 Years, Cancers (Basel), vol. 13, no. 24, p. 6254
Phillips A, Borry P, Van Hoyweghen I, Vears DF (2021) Disclosure of genetic information to family members: a systematic review of normative documents. Genet Med 23(11):2038–2046
doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01248-0
pubmed: 34234303
d’ Audiffret D, Van Haecke, de Montgolfier S (Jun. 2016) Genetic test results and Disclosure to Family members: qualitative interviews of Healthcare professionals’ perceptions of ethical and professional issues in France. J Genet Couns 25(3):483–494
d’audiffret D, Van Haecke, de Montgolfier S (2018) Genetic diseases and information to relatives: practical and ethical issues for professionals after introduction of a legal framework in France, Eur. J. Hum. Genet, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 786–795, Jun
Otlowski M (2013) Australian reforms enabling disclosure of genetic information to genetic relatives by health practitioners. J Law Med 21(1):217–234
pubmed: 24218794
Otlowski MFA (2015) Disclosing genetic information to at-risk relatives: new Australian privacy principles, but uniformity still elusive, Med. J. Aust, vol. 202, no. 6, pp. 335–337, Mar
Tiller J et al (2020) Nov., Disclosing genetic information to family members without consent: Five Australian case studies, Eur. J. Med. Genet, vol. 63, no. 11, p. 104035
Anna M et al (2020) Oct., Professional duties are now considered legal duties of care within genomic medicine, Eur. J. Hum. Genet, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 1301–1304
Phillips A et al (2021) Informing relatives of their genetic risk: an examination of the Belgian legal context, Eur. J. Hum. Genet vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 766–771, Jan. 2022
Boardman FK, Clark CC (2021) What is a ‘serious’ genetic condition? The perceptions of people living with genetic conditions, Eur. J. Hum. Genet pp. 1–10, Sep. 2021
Owens K, Sankar P, Asfaha DM (Feb. 2023) How clinicians conceptualize ‘Actionability’ in genomic screening. J Pers Med 13(2):290
Soini S (2012) Genetic testing legislation in Western Europe—a fluctuating regulatory target. J Community Genet 32(3, 2):143–153 Jan. 2012
doi: 10.1007/s12687-012-0078-0
Meggiolaro N, Barlow-Stewart K, Dunlop K, Newson AJ, Fleming J (2020) Disclosure to genetic relatives without consent - Australian genetic professionals’ awareness of the health privacy law. BMC Med Ethics, 21, 1
Vears DF, Gillam L, Vears D (2022) Inductive content analysis: A guide for beginning qualitative researchers, Focus Heal. Prof. Educ. A Multi-Professional J, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 111–127, Mar
Derbez B (2018) Is there a ‘right time’ for bad news? Kairos in familial communication on hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk, Soc. Sci. Med, vol. 202, pp. 13–19, Apr
Lucassen A, Gilbar R (2018) Alerting relatives about heritable risks: the limits of confidentiality, vol. 361, p. k1409, Apr
Rothstein MA Reconsidering the duty to warn genetically at-risk relatives, Genetics in Medicine, vol. 20, no. 3. Nature Publishing Group, pp. 285–290, 01-Mar-2018
Menko FH et al (2013) Jun., Informing family members of individuals with Lynch syndrome: A guideline for clinical geneticists, Fam. Cancer, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 319–324
Pedrazzani C et al (Aug. 2022) The communication chain of genetic risk: analyses of Narrative Data exploring proband–provider and proband–family communication in Hereditary breast and ovarian Cancer. J Pers Med 12(8):1249
Andersson A et al (2020) Sep., Public support for healthcare-mediated disclosure of hereditary cancer risk information: Results from a population-based survey in Sweden, Hered. Cancer Clin. Pract, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–13
Petersen HV, Frederiksen BL, Lautrup CK, Lindberg LJ, Ladelund S, Nilbert M (Jan. 2019) Unsolicited information letters to increase awareness of Lynch syndrome and familial colorectal cancer: reactions and attitudes. Fam Cancer 18(1):43–51
Dheensa S, Fenwick A, Lucassen A (Feb. 2017) Approaching confidentiality at a familial level in genomic medicine: a focus group study with healthcare professionals. BMJ Open 7(2):e012443
Derbez B, El Haffaf Z, Galactéros F, de Montgolfier S (2018) Prévention Des maladies génétiques. Le Retour Du médecin De Famille ? Revue d’Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respe.2018.07.003
doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2018.07.003
pubmed: 30219572