Diagnostic performance of a rapid immunochromatographic test for the simultaneous detection of antibodies to Theileria equi and Babesia caballi in horses and donkeys.
Babesia caballi
Theileria equi
Competitive ELISA
Donkeys
Equine piroplasmosis
Horses
Immunochromatographic test
Journal
Parasites & vectors
ISSN: 1756-3305
Titre abrégé: Parasit Vectors
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101462774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Mar 2024
28 Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
13
02
2024
accepted:
20
03
2024
medline:
29
3
2024
pubmed:
29
3
2024
entrez:
29
3
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Equine piroplasmosis is caused by two tick-borne protozoan parasites, Theileria equi and Babesia caballi,, which are clinically relevant in susceptible horses, donkeys, and mules. Moreover, equine piroplasmosis significantly constrains international trading and equestrian events. Rapidly diagnosing both parasites in carrier animals is essential for implementing effective control measures. Here, a rapid immunochromatographic test for the simultaneous detection of antibodies to T. equi and B. caballi was evaluated using samples from horses and donkeys collected in Greece, Israel, and Italy. The results were compared with an improved competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) for detecting antibodies to both parasites using the same panel of samples. Blood samples were collected from 255 horses and donkeys. The panel consisted of 129 horses sampled at four locations in northern Greece, 105 donkeys sampled at four locations in Sicily, and 21 horses sampled at two locations in Israel. The rapid test and the cELISA were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions, and the results were subjected to a statistical analysis to determine the sensitivity and specificity of both tests and their association. The immunochromatographic test provided a result within 15 min and can be performed in the field, detecting both pathogens simultaneously. The overall coincidence rate between the rapid test and the cELISA for detecting antibodies against T. equi was 93% and 92.9% for B. caballi. The rapid test's sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for T. equi were above 91.5%. Sixteen samples were positive for both parasites in the rapid test and eight in the cELISA. Either test had no significant association between T. equi and B. caballi detection. The detection rates of both parasites were significantly higher in Italy than in Greece or Israel and in donkeys than in horses. The agreement for T. equi between the results of both tests was high in Greece (93.8%) and Italy (95.2%) and moderate in Israel (76.2%). For B. caballi, the specificity and NPV of the rapid test were high (94.2% and 98.3%, respectively), although the sensitivity and PPV were moderate (69.2% and 39.1%, respectively) due to the small sample size. However, for B. caballi, the sensitivity was higher with the rapid test. The rapid test detected T. equi and B. caballi simultaneously in the field, potentially replacing laborious cELISA testing and is recommended for import/export purposes. The test can also be helpful for the differential diagnosis of clinical cases, since seropositivity may rule out equine piroplasmosis since it does not indicate current or active infection.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Equine piroplasmosis is caused by two tick-borne protozoan parasites, Theileria equi and Babesia caballi,, which are clinically relevant in susceptible horses, donkeys, and mules. Moreover, equine piroplasmosis significantly constrains international trading and equestrian events. Rapidly diagnosing both parasites in carrier animals is essential for implementing effective control measures. Here, a rapid immunochromatographic test for the simultaneous detection of antibodies to T. equi and B. caballi was evaluated using samples from horses and donkeys collected in Greece, Israel, and Italy. The results were compared with an improved competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) for detecting antibodies to both parasites using the same panel of samples.
METHODS
METHODS
Blood samples were collected from 255 horses and donkeys. The panel consisted of 129 horses sampled at four locations in northern Greece, 105 donkeys sampled at four locations in Sicily, and 21 horses sampled at two locations in Israel. The rapid test and the cELISA were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions, and the results were subjected to a statistical analysis to determine the sensitivity and specificity of both tests and their association.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The immunochromatographic test provided a result within 15 min and can be performed in the field, detecting both pathogens simultaneously. The overall coincidence rate between the rapid test and the cELISA for detecting antibodies against T. equi was 93% and 92.9% for B. caballi. The rapid test's sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for T. equi were above 91.5%. Sixteen samples were positive for both parasites in the rapid test and eight in the cELISA. Either test had no significant association between T. equi and B. caballi detection. The detection rates of both parasites were significantly higher in Italy than in Greece or Israel and in donkeys than in horses. The agreement for T. equi between the results of both tests was high in Greece (93.8%) and Italy (95.2%) and moderate in Israel (76.2%). For B. caballi, the specificity and NPV of the rapid test were high (94.2% and 98.3%, respectively), although the sensitivity and PPV were moderate (69.2% and 39.1%, respectively) due to the small sample size. However, for B. caballi, the sensitivity was higher with the rapid test.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The rapid test detected T. equi and B. caballi simultaneously in the field, potentially replacing laborious cELISA testing and is recommended for import/export purposes. The test can also be helpful for the differential diagnosis of clinical cases, since seropositivity may rule out equine piroplasmosis since it does not indicate current or active infection.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38549117
doi: 10.1186/s13071-024-06253-1
pii: 10.1186/s13071-024-06253-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
160Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Tirosh-Levy S, Gottlieb Y, Fry LM, Knowles DP, Steinman A. Twenty years of equine piroplasmosis research: global distribution, molecular diagnosis, and phylogeny. Pathog Basel Switz. 2020;9:1–32.
Scoles GA, Ueti MW. Vector ecology of equine piroplasmosis. Annu Rev Entomol. 2015;60:561–80.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-021110
pubmed: 25564746
Camino E, Pozo P, Dorrego A, Carvajal KA, Buendia A, Gonzalez S, et al. Importance of equine piroplasmosis antibody presence in Spanish horses prior to export. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2020;11:101329.
doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2019.101329
pubmed: 31734215
Aida H, Foreman JH, Ochi A, Takizawa Y, Yamanaka T. A case of equine piroplasmosis in the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games. J Equine Sci. 2023;34:93–9.
doi: 10.1294/jes.32.93
pubmed: 37781566
pmcid: 10534063
Onyiche TE, Taioe MO, Molefe NI, Biu AA, Luka J, Omeh IJ, et al. Equine piroplasmosis: an insight into global exposure of equids from 1990 to 2019 by systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasitology. 2020;147:1411–24.
doi: 10.1017/S0031182020001407
pubmed: 32741382
pmcid: 10317785
Knowles DP, Kappmeyer LS, Haney D, Herndon DR, Fry LM, Munro JB, et al. Discovery of a novel species, Theileria haneyi n. sp., infective to equids, highlights exceptional genomic diversity within the genus Theileria: implications for apicomplexan parasite surveillance. Int J Parasitol. 2018;48:679–90.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2018.03.010
pubmed: 29885436
Sears KP, Knowles DP, Fry LM. Clinical progression of Theileria haneyi in splenectomized horses reveals decreased virulence compared to Theileria equi. Pathog Basel Switz. 2022;11:254.
doi: 10.3390/pathogens11020254
Sears KP, Kappmeyer LS, Wise LN, Silva M, Ueti MW, White S, et al. Infection dynamics of Theileria equi and Theileria haneyi, a newly discovered apicomplexan of the horse. Vet Parasitol. 2019;271:68–75.
doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2019.06.009
pubmed: 31303207
Onyiche TE, Suganuma K, Igarashi I, Yokoyama N, Xuan X, Thekisoe O. A Review on equine piroplasmosis: epidemiology, vector ecology, risk factors, host immunity, diagnosis and control. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16:1736.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101736
pubmed: 31100920
pmcid: 6572709
Terrestrial Code Online Access. WOAH—World Organisation for Animal Health. https://www.woah.org/en/what-we-do/standards/codes-and-manuals/terrestrial-code-online-access/ . Accessed 10 Jan 2024.
Chen K, Hu Z, Yang G, Guo W, Qi T, Liu D, et al. Development of a duplex real-time PCR assay for simultaneous detection and differentiation of Theileria equi and Babesia caballi. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022;69:e1338–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.14464 .
Bhoora R, Franssen L, Oosthuizen MC, Guthrie AJ, Zweygarth E, Penzhorn BL, et al. Sequence heterogeneity in the 18S rRNA gene within Theileria equi and Babesia caballi from horses in South Africa. Vet Parasitol. 2009;159:112.
doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.10.004
pubmed: 19019541
Bhoora R, Quan M, Franssen L, Butler CM, Van der Kolk JH, Guthrie AJ, et al. Development and evaluation of real-time PCR assays for the quantitative detection of Babesia caballi and Theileria equi infections in horses from South Africa. Vet Parasitol. 2010;168:201.
doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.11.011
pubmed: 20031328
Bhoora RV, Collins NE, Schnittger L, Troskie C, Marumo R, Labuschagne K, et al. Molecular genotyping and epidemiology of equine piroplasmids in South Africa. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2020;11:101358.
doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2019.101358
pubmed: 31870636
Yang G, Chen K, Guo W, Hu Z, Qi T, Liu D, et al. Development of a test card based on colloidal gold immunochromatographic strips for rapid detection of antibodies against Theileria equi and Babesia caballi. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10:2411–21.
Kappmeyer LS, Perryman LE, Hines SA, Baszler TV, Katz JB, Hennager SG, et al. Detection of equine antibodies to Babesia caballi by recombinant B. caballi rhoptry-associated protein 1 in a competitive-inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:2285–90.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.7.2285-2290.1999
pubmed: 10364599
pmcid: 85139
Yang G, Zhou B, Chen K, Hu Z, Guo W, Wang X, et al. Diagnostic performance of competitive ELISA and western blot methods for the detection of antibodies against Theileria equi and Babesia caballi. Microorganisms. 2022;11:21.
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11010021
pubmed: 36677312
pmcid: 9862631
Nadal C, Marsot M, Le Metayer G, Boireau P, Guillot J, Bonnet SI. Spatial and temporal circulation of Babesia caballi and Theileria equi in france based on seven years of serological data. Pathog Basel Switz. 2022;11:227.
doi: 10.3390/pathogens11020227
Nadal C, Bonnet SI, Marsot M. Eco-epidemiology of equine piroplasmosis and its associated tick vectors in Europe: a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis of prevalence. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022;69:2474–98.
doi: 10.1111/tbed.14261
pubmed: 34333863
Jongejan F, Ringenier M, Putting M, Berger L, Burgers S, Kortekaas R, et al. Novel foci of Dermacentor reticulatus ticks infected with Babesia canis and Babesia caballi in the Netherlands and in Belgium. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:1.
doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-0841-2
Kouam MK, Masuoka PM, Kantzoura V, Theodoropoulos G. Geographic distribution modeling and spatial cluster analysis for equine piroplasms in Greece. Infect Genet Evol J Mol Epidemiol Evol Genet Infect Dis. 2010;10:1013–8.
Kouam MK, Kantzoura V, Gajadhar AA, Theis JH, Papadopoulos E, Theodoropoulos GG. Seroprevalence of equine piroplasms and host-related factors associated with infection in Greece. Vet Parasitol. 2010;169:273–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.01.011
pubmed: 20138434
Kouam MK, Kantzoura V, Masuoka PM, Gajadhar AA, Theodoropoulos G. Genetic diversity of equine piroplasms in Greece with a note on speciation within Theileria genotypes (T. equi and T. equi-like). Infect Genet Evol J Mol Epidemiol Evol Genet Infect Dis. 2010;10:963–8.
Tirosh-Levy S, Steinman A, Levy H, Katz Y, Shtilman M, Gottlieb Y. Parasite load and genotype are associated with clinical outcome of piroplasm-infected equines in Israel. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13:267.
doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04133-y
pubmed: 32434550
pmcid: 7240905
Steinman A, Zimmerman T, Klement E, Lensky IM, Berlin D, Gottlieb Y, et al. Demographic and environmental risk factors for infection by Theileria equi in 590 horses in Israel. Vet Parasitol. 2012;187:558–62.
doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.01.018
pubmed: 22293151
Veronesi F, Morganti G, Ravagnan S, Laus F, Spaterna A, Diaferia M, et al. Molecular and serological detection of tick-borne pathogens in donkeys (Equus asinus) in Italy. Vet Microbiol. 2014;173:348–54.
doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.08.017
pubmed: 25213231
Laus F, Spaterna A, Faillace V, Veronesi F, Ravagnan S, Beribé F, et al. Clinical investigation on Theileria equi and Babesia caballi infections in Italian donkeys. BMC Vet Res. 2015;11:1–7.
doi: 10.1186/s12917-015-0411-z
Rapoport A, Aharonson-Raz K, Berlin D, Tal S, Gottlieb Y, Klement E, et al. Molecular characterization of the Babesia caballi rap-1 gene and epidemiological survey in horses in Israel. Infect Genet Evol. 2014;23:115–20.
doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2014.01.033
pubmed: 24524984
Tirosh-Levy S, Mazuz ML, Savitsky I, Pinkas D, Gottlieb Y, Steinman A. Serological and molecular prevalence of Babesia caballi in apparently healthy horses in Israel. Pathogens. 2021;10:445.
doi: 10.3390/pathogens10040445
pubmed: 33917822
pmcid: 8068206
Bastos RG, Sears KP, Dinkel KD, Kappmeyer L, Ueti MW, Knowles DP, et al. Development of an indirect elisa to detect equine antibodies to Theileria haneyi. Pathogens. 2021;10:1–11.
doi: 10.3390/pathogens10030270