Safer and more efficient vital signs monitoring protocols to identify the deteriorating patients in the general hospital ward: an observational study.
EARLY WARNING SCORES
NATIONAL EARLY WARNING SCORE (NEWS)
NURSING WORKFORCE
OBSERVATION FREQUENCY
PATIENT DETERIORATION
PATIENT MONITORING
Journal
Health and social care delivery research
ISSN: 2755-0060
Titre abrégé: Health Soc Care Deliv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918470788706676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2024
Mar 2024
Historique:
medline:
29
3
2024
pubmed:
29
3
2024
entrez:
29
3
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The frequency at which patients should have their vital signs (e.g. blood pressure, pulse, oxygen saturation) measured on hospital wards is currently unknown. Current National Health Service monitoring protocols are based on expert opinion but supported by little empirical evidence. The challenge is finding the balance between insufficient monitoring (risking missing early signs of deterioration and delays in treatment) and over-observation of stable patients (wasting resources needed in other aspects of care). Provide an evidence-based approach to creating monitoring protocols based on a patient's risk of deterioration and link these to nursing workload and economic impact. Our study consisted of two parts: (1) an observational study of nursing staff to ascertain the time to perform vital sign observations; and (2) a retrospective study of historic data on patient admissions exploring the relationships between National Early Warning Score and risk of outcome over time. These were underpinned by opinions and experiences from stakeholders. Observational study: observed nursing staff on 16 randomly selected adult general wards at four acute National Health Service hospitals. Retrospective study: extracted, linked and analysed routinely collected data from two large National Health Service acute trusts; data from over 400,000 patient admissions and 9,000,000 vital sign observations. Observational study found a variety of practices, with two hospitals having registered nurses take the majority of vital sign observations and two favouring healthcare assistants or student nurses. However, whoever took the observations spent roughly the same length of time. The average was 5:01 minutes per observation over a 'round', including time to locate and prepare the equipment and travel to the patient area. Retrospective study created survival models predicting the risk of outcomes over time since the patient was last observed. For low-risk patients, there was little difference in risk between 4 hours and 24 hours post observation. We explored several different scenarios with our stakeholders (clinicians and patients), based on how 'risk' could be managed in different ways. Vital sign observations are often done more frequently than necessary from a bald assessment of the patient's risk, and we show that a maximum threshold of risk could theoretically be achieved with less resource. Existing resources could therefore be redeployed within a changed protocol to achieve better outcomes for some patients without compromising the safety of the rest. Our work supports the approach of the current monitoring protocol, whereby patients' National Early Warning Score 2 guides observation frequency. Existing practice is to observe higher-risk patients more frequently and our findings have shown that this is objectively justified. It is worth noting that important nurse-patient interactions take place during vital sign monitoring and should not be eliminated under new monitoring processes. Our study contributes to the existing evidence on how vital sign observations should be scheduled. However, ultimately, it is for the relevant professionals to decide how our work should be used. This study is registered as ISRCTN10863045. This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: 17/05/03) and is published in full in Patient recovery in hospital is tracked by measuring heart rate, blood pressure and other ‘vital signs’ and converting them into a score. These are ‘observed’ regularly by nursing staff so that deterioration can be spotted early. However, taking observations can disturb patients, and taking them too often causes extra work for staff. More frequent monitoring is recommended for higher scores, but evidence is lacking. To work out how often patients should be monitored, we needed to know how likely it is for patients to become more unwell between observations. We analysed over 400,000 patient records from two hospitals to understand how scores change with time. We looked at three of the most serious risks for patients in hospital. These risks are dying, needing intensive care or having a cardiac arrest. We also looked at the risk that a patient’s condition would deteriorate significantly before their measurements were taken again. We identified early signs of deterioration and how changes in vital signs affected the risk of a patient’s condition becoming worse. From this we calculated a maximum risk of deterioration. We then calculated different monitoring schedules that keep individual patients below this risk level. Some of those would consume less staff time than current National Health Service guidelines suggest. We also watched staff record patients’ vital signs. We learnt it takes about 5 minutes to take these measurements from each patient. This information helped us calculate how costs would change if patients’ vital signs were taken more or less often. We found that patients with a low overall score could have their vital signs monitored less often without being in danger of serious harm. This frees up nursing time so that patients with a higher score can be monitored more often. Importantly, this can be achieved without employing more staff.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
The frequency at which patients should have their vital signs (e.g. blood pressure, pulse, oxygen saturation) measured on hospital wards is currently unknown. Current National Health Service monitoring protocols are based on expert opinion but supported by little empirical evidence. The challenge is finding the balance between insufficient monitoring (risking missing early signs of deterioration and delays in treatment) and over-observation of stable patients (wasting resources needed in other aspects of care).
Objective
UNASSIGNED
Provide an evidence-based approach to creating monitoring protocols based on a patient's risk of deterioration and link these to nursing workload and economic impact.
Design
UNASSIGNED
Our study consisted of two parts: (1) an observational study of nursing staff to ascertain the time to perform vital sign observations; and (2) a retrospective study of historic data on patient admissions exploring the relationships between National Early Warning Score and risk of outcome over time. These were underpinned by opinions and experiences from stakeholders.
Setting and participants
UNASSIGNED
Observational study: observed nursing staff on 16 randomly selected adult general wards at four acute National Health Service hospitals. Retrospective study: extracted, linked and analysed routinely collected data from two large National Health Service acute trusts; data from over 400,000 patient admissions and 9,000,000 vital sign observations.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Observational study found a variety of practices, with two hospitals having registered nurses take the majority of vital sign observations and two favouring healthcare assistants or student nurses. However, whoever took the observations spent roughly the same length of time. The average was 5:01 minutes per observation over a 'round', including time to locate and prepare the equipment and travel to the patient area. Retrospective study created survival models predicting the risk of outcomes over time since the patient was last observed. For low-risk patients, there was little difference in risk between 4 hours and 24 hours post observation.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
We explored several different scenarios with our stakeholders (clinicians and patients), based on how 'risk' could be managed in different ways. Vital sign observations are often done more frequently than necessary from a bald assessment of the patient's risk, and we show that a maximum threshold of risk could theoretically be achieved with less resource. Existing resources could therefore be redeployed within a changed protocol to achieve better outcomes for some patients without compromising the safety of the rest. Our work supports the approach of the current monitoring protocol, whereby patients' National Early Warning Score 2 guides observation frequency. Existing practice is to observe higher-risk patients more frequently and our findings have shown that this is objectively justified. It is worth noting that important nurse-patient interactions take place during vital sign monitoring and should not be eliminated under new monitoring processes. Our study contributes to the existing evidence on how vital sign observations should be scheduled. However, ultimately, it is for the relevant professionals to decide how our work should be used.
Study registration
UNASSIGNED
This study is registered as ISRCTN10863045.
Funding
UNASSIGNED
This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: 17/05/03) and is published in full in
Patient recovery in hospital is tracked by measuring heart rate, blood pressure and other ‘vital signs’ and converting them into a score. These are ‘observed’ regularly by nursing staff so that deterioration can be spotted early. However, taking observations can disturb patients, and taking them too often causes extra work for staff. More frequent monitoring is recommended for higher scores, but evidence is lacking. To work out how often patients should be monitored, we needed to know how likely it is for patients to become more unwell between observations. We analysed over 400,000 patient records from two hospitals to understand how scores change with time. We looked at three of the most serious risks for patients in hospital. These risks are dying, needing intensive care or having a cardiac arrest. We also looked at the risk that a patient’s condition would deteriorate significantly before their measurements were taken again. We identified early signs of deterioration and how changes in vital signs affected the risk of a patient’s condition becoming worse. From this we calculated a maximum risk of deterioration. We then calculated different monitoring schedules that keep individual patients below this risk level. Some of those would consume less staff time than current National Health Service guidelines suggest. We also watched staff record patients’ vital signs. We learnt it takes about 5 minutes to take these measurements from each patient. This information helped us calculate how costs would change if patients’ vital signs were taken more or less often. We found that patients with a low overall score could have their vital signs monitored less often without being in danger of serious harm. This frees up nursing time so that patients with a higher score can be monitored more often. Importantly, this can be achieved without employing more staff.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
Patient recovery in hospital is tracked by measuring heart rate, blood pressure and other ‘vital signs’ and converting them into a score. These are ‘observed’ regularly by nursing staff so that deterioration can be spotted early. However, taking observations can disturb patients, and taking them too often causes extra work for staff. More frequent monitoring is recommended for higher scores, but evidence is lacking. To work out how often patients should be monitored, we needed to know how likely it is for patients to become more unwell between observations. We analysed over 400,000 patient records from two hospitals to understand how scores change with time. We looked at three of the most serious risks for patients in hospital. These risks are dying, needing intensive care or having a cardiac arrest. We also looked at the risk that a patient’s condition would deteriorate significantly before their measurements were taken again. We identified early signs of deterioration and how changes in vital signs affected the risk of a patient’s condition becoming worse. From this we calculated a maximum risk of deterioration. We then calculated different monitoring schedules that keep individual patients below this risk level. Some of those would consume less staff time than current National Health Service guidelines suggest. We also watched staff record patients’ vital signs. We learnt it takes about 5 minutes to take these measurements from each patient. This information helped us calculate how costs would change if patients’ vital signs were taken more or less often. We found that patients with a low overall score could have their vital signs monitored less often without being in danger of serious harm. This frees up nursing time so that patients with a higher score can be monitored more often. Importantly, this can be achieved without employing more staff.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1-143Références
Royal College of Physicians. National Early Warning Score (NEWS): Standardising the Assessment of Acute Illness Severity in the NHS. Report of a Working Party. London: RCP. 2012.
National Institute for Health Care Excellence. Acutely Ill Patients in Hospital: Recognition of and Response to Acute Illness in Adults in Hospital. NICE Guideline. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2007.
DeVita MA, Smith GB, Adam SK, Adams-Pizarro I, Buist M, Bellomo R, et al. ‘Identifying the hospitalised patient in crisis’: a consensus conference on the afferent limb of rapid response systems. Resuscitation 2010;81:375–82.
Smith GB, Recio-Saucedo A, Griffiths P. The measurement frequency and completeness of vital signs in general hospital wards: an evidence free zone? Int J Nurs Stud 2017;74:A1–4.
Smith GB, Prytherch DR, Meredith P, Schmidt PE, Featherstone PI. The ability of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) to discriminate patients at risk of early cardiac arrest, unanticipated intensive care unit admission, and death. Resuscitation 2013;84:465–70.
Abbott TEF, Torrance HDT, Cron N, Vaid N, Emmanuel J. A single-centre cohort study of National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and near patient testing in acute medical admissions. Eur J Intern Med 2016;35:78–82.
Kovacs C, Jarvis SW, Prytherch DR, Meredith P, Schmidt PE, Briggs JS, Smith GB. Comparison of the National Early Warning Score in non-elective medical and surgical patients. Br J Surg 2016;103:1385–93.
National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcomes and Death. Time to Intervene? A Review of Patients Who Underwent Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation as a Result of an In-Hospital Cardiorespiratory Arrest. London: National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcomes and Death; 2012.
Keogh B. Review into the Quality of Care and Treatment Provided by 14 Hospital Trusts in England: Overview Report. London: NHS. 2013.
National Patient Safety Agency. Safer Care for the Acutely Ill Patient: Learning from Serious Incidents. The Fifth Report from the Patient Safety Observatory. National Patient Safety Agency; 2007.
Cardona-Morrell M, Prgomet M, Lake R, Nicholson M, Harrison R, Long J, et al. Vital signs monitoring and nurse–patient interaction: a qualitative observational study of hospital practice. Int J Nurs Stud 2015;56:9–16.
Hands C, Reid E, Meredith P, Smith GB, Prytherch DR, Schmidt PE, Featherstone PI. Patterns in the recording of vital signs and early warning scores: compliance with a clinical escalation protocol. BMJ Qual Saf 2013;22:719–26.
National Patient Safety Agency. Recognising and Responding Appropriately to Early Signs of Deterioration in Hospitalised Patients. London: NPSA; 2007. URL: www.patientsafetyoxford.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/NPSA-DeteriorPatients.pdf (accessed 15 October 2021).
National Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Deaths. The NCEPOD Classification of Intervention. London: NCEPOD; 2004.
Ball JE, Murrells T, Rafferty AM, Morrow E, Griffiths P. ‘Care left undone’ during nursing shifts: associations with workload and perceived quality of care. BMJ Qual Saf 2014;23:116–25.
Silber JH, Williams SV, Krakauer H, Schwartz JS. Hospital and patient characteristics associated with death after surgery. A study of adverse occurrence and failure to rescue. Med Care 1992;30:615–29.
Aiken LH, Sloane DM, Bruyneel L, Van den Heede K, Griffiths P, Busse R, et al. Nurse staffing and education and hospital mortality in nine European countries: a retrospective observational study. Lancet 2014;383:1824–30.
Cardona-Morrell M, Prgomet M, Turner RM, Nicholson M, Hillman K. Effectiveness of continuous or intermittent vital signs monitoring in preventing adverse events on general wards: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Clin Pract 2016;70:806–24.
Hodgson LE, Dimitrov BD, Congleton J, Venn R, Forni LG, Roderick PJ. A validation of the National Early Warning Score to predict outcome in patients with COPD exacerbation. Thorax 2016;72:23–30.
Royal College of Physicians, National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2: Standardising the Assessment of Acute-Illness Severity in the NHS. Vol. 17, Updated report of a working party. London: RCP; 2017.
Francis R. Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry: Executive Summary. Vol. 3. London: The Stationery Office; 2013. URL: www.gov.uk/government/publications/report-of-the-mid-staffordshire-nhs-foundation-trust-public-inquiry (accessed 15 October 2021).
Silber JH, Romano PS, Rosen AK, Wang Y, Even-Shoshan O, Volpp KG. Failure-to-rescue: comparing definitions to measure quality of care. Med Care 2007;45:918–25. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17890988/ (accessed 15 October 2021).
Griffiths P, Jones S, Bottle A. Is ‘failure to rescue’ derived from administrative data in England a nurse sensitive patient safety indicator for surgical care? Observational study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50:292–300. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23195407/ (accessed 15 October 2021).
Herasevich V, Pieper MS, Pulido J, Gajic O. Enrollment into a time sensitive clinical study in the critical care setting: results from computerized septic shock sniffer implementation. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:639–44.
Henry KE, Hager DN, Pronovost PJ, Saria S. A targeted real-time early warning score (TREWScore) for septic shock. Sci Transl Med 2015;7:299ra122.
Churpek MM, Yuen TC, Winslow C, Robicsek AA, Meltzer DO, Gibbons RD, Edelson DP. Multicenter development and validation of a risk stratification tool for ward patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190:649–55.
Yoder JC, Yuen TC, Churpek MM, Arora VM, Edelson DP. A prospective study of nighttime vital sign monitoring frequency and risk of clinical deterioration. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173:1554.
Griffiths P, Recio-Saucedo A, Schmidt P, Smith G. Vital signs monitoring in hospitals at night. Nurs Times 2015;111:16–7.
Griffiths P, Recio-Saucedo A, Dall’ora C, Briggs J, Maruotti A, Meredith P, et al.; Missed Care Study Group. The association between nurse staffing and omissions in nursing care: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2018;74:1474–87. URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29517813 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Recio-Saucedo A, Dall’ora C, Maruotti A, Ball J, Briggs J, Meredith P, et al. What impact does nursing care left undone have on patient outcomes? Review of the literature. J Clin Nurs 2018;27:2248–59.
Barker HR, Griffiths P, Mesa-Eguiagaray I, Pickering R, Gould L, Bridges J. Quantity and quality of interaction between staff and older patients in UK hospital wards: a descriptive study. Int J Nurs Stud 2016;62:100–7.
Wong D, Bonnici T, Knight J, Gerry S, Turton J, Watkinson P. A ward-based time study of paper and electronic documentation for recording vital sign observations. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017;24:717–21.
The Royal College of Surgeons of England, Department of Health. The Higher Risk General Surgical Patient: Towards Improved Care for a Forgotten Group. London: Royal College of Surgeons of England; 2011. URL: www.rcseng.ac.uk/library-and-publications/rcs-publications/docs/the-higher-risk-general-surgical-patient/ (accessed 15 October 2021).
McGaughey J, Blackwood B, O’Halloran P, Trinder TJ, Porter S. Realistic Evaluation of Early Warning Systems and the Acute Life-threatening Events – Recognition and Treatment Training course for early recognition and management of deteriorating ward-based patients: research protocol. J Adv Nurs 2010;66:923–32.
Alam N, Vegting IL, Houben E, van Berkel B, Vaughan L, Kramer MHH, Nanayakkara PWB. Exploring the performance of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) in a European emergency department. Resuscitation 2015;90:111–5.
Sbiti-Rohr D, Kutz A, Christ-Crain M, Thomann R, Zimmerli W, Hoess C, et al.; ProHOSP Study Group. The National Early Warning Score (NEWS) for outcome prediction in emergency department patients with community-acquired pneumonia: results from a 6-year prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2016;6:e011021.
Abbott TEF, Vaid N, Ip D, Cron N, Wells M, Torrance HDT, Emmanuel J. A single-centre observational cohort study of admission National Early Warning Score (NEWS). Resuscitation 2015;92:89–93.
Smith GB. In-hospital cardiac arrest: is it time for an in-hospital ‘chain of prevention’? Resuscitation 2010;81:1209–11.
Freedman NS, Kotzer N, Schwab RJ. Patient perception of sleep quality and etiology of sleep disruption in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;159:1155–62.
Figueroa-Ramos MI, Arroyo-Novoa CM, Lee KA, Padilla G, Puntillo KA. Sleep and delirium in ICU patients: a review of mechanisms and manifestations. Intensive Care Med 2009;35:781–95.
Watkinson PJ, Barber VS, Price JD, Hann A, Tarassenko L, Young JD. A randomised controlled trial of the effect of continuous electronic physiological monitoring on the adverse event rate in high risk medical and surgical patients. Anaesthesia 2006;61:1031–9.
van Loon K, van Zaane B, Bosch EJ, Kalkman CJ, Peelen LM. Non-invasive continuous respiratory monitoring on general hospital wards: a systematic review. PLOS ONE 2015;10:e0144626.
Kroll RR, Boyd JG, Maslove DM. Accuracy of a wrist-worn wearable device for monitoring heart rates in hospital inpatients: a prospective observational study. J Med Internet Res 2016;18:e253.
Jeffs E, Vollam S, Young JD, Horsington L, Lynch B, Watkinson PJ. Wearable monitors for patients following discharge from an intensive care unit: practical lessons learnt from an observational study. J Adv Nurs 2016;72:1851–62.
Downey C, Randell R, Brown J, Jayne DG. Continuous versus intermittent vital signs monitoring using a wearable, wireless patch in patients admitted to surgical wards: pilot cluster randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2018;20:e10802. URL: www.jmir.org/2018/12/e10802 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Reed MJ, McGrath M, Black PL, Lewis S, McCann C, Whiting S, et al. Detection of physiological deterioration by the SNAP40 wearable device compared to standard monitoring devices in the emergency department: the SNAP40-ED study. Diagn Progn Res 2018;2:18. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31093566/ (accessed 12 October 2021).
Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J 2009;26:91–108.
Peters M, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Soares C, Khalil H, Parker D. The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual 2015: Methodology for JBI Scoping Reviews. Adelaide, South Australia: The Joanna Briggs Institute; 2015.
Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci 2010;5:1–9.
Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018;18:1–7.
Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2005;8:19–32.
Petersen JA. Early warning score challenges and opportunities in the care of deteriorating patients. Dan Med J 2018;65:B5439
Petersen JA, Antonsen K, Rasmussen LS. Frequency of early warning score assessment and clinical deterioration in hospitalized patients: a randomized trial. Resuscitation 2016;101:91–6.
Zografakis-Sfakianakis M, De Bree E, Linardakis M, Messaritaki A, Askitopoulou H, Papaioannou A, Aggouridakis P. The value of the modified early warning score for unplanned intensive care unit admissions of patients treated in hospital general wards. Int J Nurs Pract 2018;24:e12632–8.
Freathy S, Smith GB, Schoonhoven L, Westwood G. The response to patient deterioration in the UK National Health Service – a survey of acute hospital policies. Resuscitation 2019;139:152–8.
Zeitz K, McCutcheon H. Observations and vital signs: ritual or vital for the monitoring of postoperative patients? Appl Nurs Res 2006;19:204–11. URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17098158 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Elvekjaer M, Aasvang EK, Olsen RM, Sørensen HBD, Porsbjerg CM, Jensen JU, et al.; WARD-Project Group. Physiological abnormalities in patients admitted with acute exacerbation of COPD: an observational study with continuous monitoring. J Clin Monit Comput 2019;34:1051–60.
Chen L, Olufunmilayo O, Clermont G, Hravnak M, Pinsky MR, Dubrawski AW. Dynamic and personalized risk forecast in step-down units: implications for monitoring paradigms. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2017;14:384–91.
Weller RS, Foard KL, Harwood TN. Evaluation of a wireless, portable, wearable multi-parameter vital signs monitor in hospitalized neurological and neurosurgical patients. J Clin Monit Comput 2018;32:945–51.
Duus CL, Aasvang EK, Olsen RM, Sørensen HBD, Jørgensen LN, Achiam MP, Meyhoff CS. Continuous vital sign monitoring after major abdominal surgery-quantification of micro events. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2018;62:1200–8.
Brown H, Terrence J, Vasquez P, Bates DW, Zimlichman E. Continuous monitoring in an inpatient medical-surgical unit: a controlled clinical trial. Am J Med 2014;127:226–32.
Ludikhuize J, Borgert M, Binnekade J, Subbe C, Dongelmans D, Goossens A. Standardized measurement of the Modified Early Warning Score results in enhanced implementation of a Rapid Response System: a quasi-experimental study. Resuscitation 2014;85:676–82.
Credland N, Dyson J, Johnson MJ. What are the patterns of compliance with Early Warning Track and Trigger Tools: a narrative review. Appl Nurs Res 2018;44:39–47.
Kellett J, Sebat F. Make vital signs great again – a call for action. Eur J Intern Med 2017;45:13–19.
Storm-Versloot MN, Verweij L, Lucas C, Ludikhuize J, Goslings JC, Legemate DA, Vermeulen H. Clinical relevance of routinely measured vital signs in hospitalized patients: a systematic review. J Nurs Scholarsh 2014;46:39–49.
Sun L, Joshi M, Khan SN, Ashrafian H, Darzi A. Clinical impact of multi-parameter continuous non-invasive monitoring in hospital wards: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J R Soc Med 2020;113:217–24.
Redfern OC, Pimentel MAF, Prytherch D, Meredith P, Clifton DA, Tarassenko L, et al. Predicting in-hospital mortality and unanticipated admissions to the intensive care unit using routinely collected blood tests and vital signs: development and validation of a multivariable model. Resuscitation 2018;133:75–81.
Goldhill DR, McNarry AF, Mandersloot G, McGinley A. A physiologically-based early warning score for ward patients: the association between score and outcome. Anaesthesia 2005;60:547–53.
Tarassenko L, Clifton DA, Pinsky MR, Hravnak MT, Woods JR, Watkinson PJ. Centile-based early warning scores derived from statistical distributions of vital signs. Resuscitation 2011;82:1013–18.
Subbe CP, Slater A, Menon D, Gemmell L. Validation of physiological scoring systems in the accident and emergency department. Emerg Med J 2006;23:841–5.
Prytherch DR, Smith GB, Schmidt PE, Featherstone PI. ViEWS – towards a national early warning score for detecting adult inpatient deterioration. Resuscitation 2010;81:932–7.
van Galen LS, Dijkstra CC, Ludikhuize J, Kramer MHH, Nanayakkara PWB. A protocolised once a day Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) measurement is an appropriate screening tool for major adverse events in a general hospital population. PLOS ONE 2016;11:e0160811.
Ede J, Jeffs E, Vollam S, Watkinson P. A qualitative exploration of escalation of care in the acute ward setting. Nurs Crit Care 2019;25:171–8.
Mok W, Wang W, Cooper S, Ang ENK, Liaw SY. Attitudes towards vital signs monitoring in the detection of clinical deterioration: scale development and survey of ward nurses. Int J Qual Health Care 2015;27:207–13. URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25888564 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Petersen JA, Mackel R, Antonsen K, Rasmussen LS. Serious adverse events in a hospital using early warning score – what went wrong? Resuscitation 2014;85:1699–703.
Ludikhuize J, Smorenburg SM, de Rooij SE, de Jonge E. Identification of deteriorating patients on general wards; measurement of vital parameters and potential effectiveness of the Modified Early Warning Score. J Crit Care 2012;27:424.e7–13.
McGregor C, Chohan S, O’Reilly J. Collaborative approach to reducing cardiac arrests in an acute medical unit. BMJ Open Qual 2017;6:e000026.
Taenzer AH, Pyke J, Herrick MD, Dodds TM, McGrath SP. A comparison of oxygen saturation data in inpatients with low oxygen saturation using automated continuous monitoring and intermittent manual data charting. Anesth Analg 2014;118:326–31.
Areia C, King E, Ede J, Young L, Tarassenko L, Watkinson P, Vollam S. Experiences of current vital signs monitoring practices and views of wearable monitoring: a qualitative study in patients and nurses. J Adv Nurs 2021;78:810–22.
Elvekjaer M, Carlsson CJ, Rasmussen SM, Porsbjerg CM, Gronbæk KK, Haahr-Raunkjær C, et al. Agreement between wireless and standard measurements of vital signs in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a clinical validation study. Physiol Meas 2021;42.
Järvelä K, Takala P, Michard F, Vikatmaa L. Clinical evaluation of a wearable sensor for mobile monitoring of respiratory rate on hospital wards. J Clin Monit Comput 2021;36:81–6.
Mestrom E, De Bie A, van de Steeg M, Driessen M, Atallah L, Bezemer R, et al. Implementation of an automated early warning scoring system in a surgical ward: practical use and effects on patient outcomes. PLOS ONE 2019;14:e0213402.
Tirkkonen J, Ylä-Mattila J, Olkkola KT, Huhtala H, Tenhunen J, Hoppu S. Factors associated with delayed activation of medical emergency team and excess mortality: an Utstein-style analysis. Resuscitation 2013;84:173–8.
Khanna AK, Ahuja S, Weller R, Harwood TN. Post-Operative Ward Monitoring – Why; What Now? Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2019.
Blankush JM, Freeman R, McIlvaine J, Tran T, Nassani S, Leitman IM. Implementation of a novel postoperative monitoring system using automated Modified Early Warning Scores (MEWS) incorporating end-tidal capnography. J Clin Monit Comput 2017;31:1081–92.
Pimentel MAF, Redfern OC, Hatch R, Young JD, Tarassenko L, Watkinson PJ. Trajectories of vital signs in patients with COVID-19. Resuscitation 2020;156:99–106.
Tóth V, Meytlis M, Barnaby DP, Bock KR, Oppenheim MI, Al-Abed Y, et al. Let Sleeping Patients Lie, avoiding unnecessary overnight vitals monitoring using a clinically based deep-learning model. NPJ Digit Med 2020;3(1):149.
Dall’ora C, Griffiths P, Hope J, Barker H, Smith GB. What is the nursing time and workload involved in taking and recording patients’ vital signs? A systematic review. J Clin Nurs 2020;29:2053–68. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jocn.15202 (accessed 12 November 2021).
Brekke IJ, Puntervoll LH, Pedersen PB, Kellett J, Brabrand M. The value of vital sign trends in predicting and monitoring clinical deterioration: a systematic review. PLOS ONE 2019;14:e0210875. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210875
Churpek MM, Adhikari R, Edelson DP. The value of vital sign trends for detecting clinical deterioration on the wards. Resuscitation 2016;102:1–5. URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26898412 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Kause J, Smith G, Prytherch D, Parr M, Flabouris A, Hillman K; Intensive Care Society (UK). A comparison of antecedents to cardiac arrests, deaths and emergency intensive care admissions in Australia and New Zealand, and the United Kingdom – the ACADEMIA study. Resuscitation 2004;62:275–82. URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15325446 (accessed 27 February 2020).
Hogan H, Healey F, Neale G, Thomson R, Vincent C, Black N. Preventable deaths due to problems in care in English acute hospitals: a retrospective case record review study. BMJ Qual Saf 2012;21:737–45.
Odell M, Victor C, Oliver D. Nurses’ role in detecting deterioration in ward patients: systematic literature review. J Adv Nurs 2009;65:1992–2006. URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20568317 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Rose L, Clarke SP. Vital signs. Am J Nurs 2010;110:11. URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20520095 (accessed 12 November 2021).
Odell M. Detection and management of the deteriorating ward patient: an evaluation of nursing practice. J Clin Nurs 2015;24:173–82. URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25039312 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Palese A, Ambrosi E, Prosperi L, Guarnier A, Barelli P, Zambiasi P, et al. Missed nursing care and predicting factors in the Italian medical care setting. Intern Emerg Med 2015;10:693–702. URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25840678 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Schubert M, Ausserhofer D, Desmedt M, Schwendimann R, Lesaffre E, Li B, De Geest S. Levels and correlates of implicit rationing of nursing care in Swiss acute care hospitals – a cross sectional study. Int J Nurs Stud 2013;50:230–9. URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23084600 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Wood C, Chaboyer W, Carr P. How do nurses use early warning scoring systems to detect and act on patient deterioration to ensure patient safety? A scoping review. Int J Nurs Stud 2019;94:166–78. URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31002971 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Zander B, Dobler L, Baumler M, Busse R. [Nursing tasks left undone in German acute care hospitals: results from the international study RN4Cast]. Gesundheitswesen 2014;76:727–34. URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24771101 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Griffiths P, Ball J, Bloor K, Böhning D, Briggs J, Dall’ora C, et al. Nurse staffing levels, missed vital signs and mortality in hospitals: retrospective longitudinal observational study. Health Serv Deliv Res 2018;6:38. https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr06380
Dall’ora C, Griffiths P, Redfern O, Recio-Saucedo A, Meredith P, Ball J; Missed Care Study Group. Nurses’ 12-hour shifts and missed or delayed vital signs observations on hospital wards: retrospective observational study. BMJ Open 2019;9:e024778. URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30782743 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Downey CL, Chapman S, Randell R, Brown JM, Jayne DG. The impact of continuous versus intermittent vital signs monitoring in hospitals: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Int J Nurs Stud 2018;84:19–27. URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29729558 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Miltner RS, Johnson KD, Deierhoi R. Exploring the frequency of blood pressure documentation in emergency departments. J Nurs Scholarsh 2014;46:98–105. URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24355058 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Munn Z, Moola S, Riitano D, Lisy K. The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence. Int J Health Policy Manag 2014;3:123–8. URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25197676 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Bellomo R, Ackerman M, Bailey M, Beale R, Clancy G, Danesh V, et al.; Vital Signs to Identify, Target, and Assess Level of Care Study (VITAL Care Study) Investigators. A controlled trial of electronic automated advisory vital signs monitoring in general hospital wards. Crit Care Med 2012;40:2349–61. URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22809908 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Fuller T, Fox B, Lake D, Crawford K. Improving real-time vital signs documentation. Nurs Manage 2018;49:28–33. URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29287047 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Ito C, Satoh I, Michiya H, Kitayama Y, Miyazaki K, Ota S, et al. Reducing nurses’. Workload using a computerized nursing support system linked to the hospital information system. Stud Health Technol Inform 1997;46:527–32.
McGrath SP, Perreard IM, Garland MD, Converse KA, Mackenzie TA. Improving patient safety and clinician workflow in the general care setting with enhanced surveillance monitoring. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2019;23:857–66. URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29993903 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Adomat R, Hicks C. Measuring nursing workload in intensive care: an observational study using closed circuit video cameras. J Adv Nurs 2003;42:402–12.
Clarke MF. Exploration of Nursing Intensity in a Sample of Acute Care Cardiovascular Patients Using the Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC). Iowa: University of Iowa; 2006.
Hendrich A, Chow MP, Skierczynski BA, Lu Z. A 36-hospital time and motion study: how do medical-surgical nurses spend their time? Perm J 2008;12:25–34. URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3037121/pdf/i1552-5775-12-3-25.pdf (accessed 15 October 2021).
Hoi SY, Ismail N, Ong LC, Kang J. Determining nurse staffing needs: the workload intensity measurement system. J Nurs Manag 2010;18:44–53. URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20465728 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Kimura E, Nakai M, Ishihara K. Evaluation of efficiency improvement in vital documentation using RFID devices. Stud Health Technol Inform 2016;225:1042.
Wager KA, Schaffner MJ, Foulois B, Kazley AS, Parker C, Walo H. Comparison of the quality and timeliness of vital signs data using three different data-entry devices. Comput Inform Nurs 2010;28:205–12. URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20571371 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Yeung MS, Lapinsky SE, Granton JT, Doran DM, Cafazzo JA. Examining nursing vital signs documentation workflow: barriers and opportunities in general internal medicine units. J Clin Nurs 2012;21:975–82. URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22243491 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Zeitz K. Nursing observations during the first 24 hours after a surgical procedure: what do we do? J Clin Nurs 2005;14:334–43. URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15707444 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Erb PS, Coble D. Vital signs measured with nursing system. Comput Healthc 1989;10:32–4. URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10292004 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Travers D. Triage: how long does it take? How long should it take? J Emerg Nurs 1999;25:238–40. URL: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=107198396&site=ehost-live (accessed 15 October 2021).
Mohammed M, Hayton R, Clements G, Smith G, Prytherch D. Improving accuracy and efficiency of early warning scores in acute care. Br J Nurs 2009;18:18–24. URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19127227 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Prytherch DR, Smith GB, Schmidt P, Featherstone PI, Stewart K, Knight D, Higgins B. Calculating early warning scores – a classroom comparison of pen and paper and hand-held computer methods. Resuscitation 2006;70:173–8.
Devita MA, Bellomo R, Hillman K, Kellum J, Rotondi A, Teres D, et al. Findings of the first consensus conference on medical emergency teams. Crit Care Med 2006;34:2463–78. URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16878033 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Osborne S, Douglas C, Reid C, Jones L, Gardner G; RBWH Patient Assessment Research Council. The primacy of vital signs – acute care nurses’ and midwives’ use of physical assessment skills: a cross sectional study. Int J Nurs Stud 2015;52:951–62. URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25704371 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Smith DJ, Aitken LM. Use of a single parameter track and trigger chart and the perceived barriers and facilitators to escalation of a deteriorating ward patient: a mixed methods study. J Clin Nurs 2016;25:175–85. URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26769205 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Hope J, Recio-Saucedo A, Fogg C, Griffiths P, Smith GB, Westwood G, Schmidt PE. A fundamental conflict of care: nurses’ accounts of balancing patients’ sleep with taking vital sign observations at night. J Clin Nurs [Internet] 2018;27:1860–71. URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29266489 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Dall’ora C, Griffiths P, Hope J, Briggs J, Jeremy J, Gerry S, Redfern OC. How long do nursing staff take to measure and record patients’ vital signs observations in hospital? A time-and-motion study. Int J Nurs Stud 2021;118:103921.
Intensive Care Society. Levels of Adult Critical Care: Consensus Statement. 2021. URL: www.ics.ac.uk/Society/Patients_and_Relatives/Levels_of_Care (accessed 15 October 2021).
Bridges J, Pickering RM, Barker H, Chable R, Fuller A, Gould L, et al. Implementing the Creating Learning Environments for Compassionate Care (CLECC) programme in acute hospital settings: a pilot RCT and feasibility study. Health Serv Deliv Res 2018. URL: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/416200/ (accessed 15 October 2021).
Dall’ora C, Hope J, Bridges J, Griffiths P. Development and validation of a methodology to measure the time taken by hospital nurses to make vital signs observations. Nurse Res 2020;28:52–8. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2020.e1716
R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, version 3.6.3. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020. URL: www.r-project.org/ (accessed 15 October 2021).
Lofland J, Snow D, Anderson L, Lofland LH. Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. 4th edn. London: Wadsworth; 2006.
Allen D. Making visible the unseen elements of nursing. Nurs Times 2015;111:17–20. URL: https://europepmc.org/article/med/26689055 (accessed 2 November 2021).
Wong D, Bonnici T, Knight J, Morgan L, Coombes P, Watkinson P. SEND: a system for electronic notification and documentation of vital sign observations. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2015;15:68.
System C. System C: e-Observations URL: www.systemc.com/solutions/epr/e-observations/ (accessed 23 July 2021).
Oceano. Patient Administration System (PAS). NHS Patient Management Portal. www.servelec.co.uk/product-range/oceano/ (accessed 23 July 2021).
Watkinson PJ, Pimentel MAF, Clifton DA, Tarassenko L. Manual centile-based early warning scores derived from statistical distributions of observational vital-sign data. Resuscitation 2018;129:55–60.
NHS Data Model and Dictionary. OPCS Classification of Interventions and Procedures. 2021. URL: https://datadictionary.nhs.uk/supporting_information/opcs_classification_of_interventions_and_procedures.html (accessed 23 July 2021).
Pimentel MA, Redfern OC, Malycha J, Meredith P, Prytherch D, Briggs J, et al. Detecting deteriorating patients in the hospital: development and validation of a novel scoring system. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2021;204:44–52. URL: www.atsjournals.org (accessed 23 July 2021).
Austin PC, Harrell FE, van Klaveren D. Graphical calibration curves and the integrated calibration index (ICI) for survival models. Stat Med 2020;39:2714–42.
Van Calster B, McLernon DJ, van Smeden M, Wynants L, Steyerberg EW, Bossuyt P; Topic Group ‘Evaluating diagnostic tests and prediction models’ of the STRATOS initiative. Calibration: the Achilles heel of predictive analytics. BMC Med 2019;17:1–7.
RStudio. Shiny. URL: https://shiny.rstudio.com/ (accessed 1 September 2021).
Jones S, Mullally M, Ingleby S, Buist M, Bailey M, Eddleston JM. Bedside electronic capture of clinical observations and automated clinical alerts to improve compliance with an early warning score protocol. Crit Care Resusc 2011;13:83–8.
Curtis L, Burns A. Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2019. Kent: Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury; 2019.
Marseille E, Larson B, Kazi DS, Kahn JG, Rosen S. Thresholds for the cost-effectiveness of interventions: alternative approaches. Bull World Health Organ 2015;93:118–24.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Changes to NICE Drug Appraisals: What You Need to Know. London: NICE; 2017.
Meacock R, Kristensen SR, Sutton M. The cost-effectiveness of using financial incentives to improve provider quality: a framework and application. Health Econ 2014;23:1–13.
Claxton K, Martin S, Soares M, Rice N, Spackman E, Hinde S, et al. Methods for the estimation of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence cost-effectiveness threshold. Health Technol Assess 2015;19:1–503, v, v–vi.
Manaseki-Holland S, Lilford RJ, Te AP, Chen Y-F, Gupta KK, Chilton PJ, Hofer TP. Ranking hospitals based on preventable hospital death rates: a systematic review with implications for both direct measurement and indirect measurement through standardized mortality rates. Milbank Q 2019;97:228–84.
Smith GB, Redfern OC, Pimentel MA, Gerry S, Collins GS, Malycha J, et al. The National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2). Clin Med (Lond) 2019;19:260. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31092526/ (accessed 12 November 2021).
Downey CL, Croft J, Buckley H, Randell R, Brown JM, Jayne DG. Trial of Remote Continuous versus Intermittent NEWS monitoring after major surgery (TRaCINg): protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2018;4:112.
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). Involve Patients. URL: www.nihr.ac.uk/health-and-care-professionals/engagement-and-participation-in-research/involve-patients.htm (accessed 27 October 2021).
Locock L, Boaz A. Drawing straight lines along blurred boundaries: qualitative research, patient and public involvement in medical research, co-production and co-design. Evid Policy 2019;15:409–21.
UK Public Involvement Standards Development Partnership. UK Standards for Public Involvement. 2019. URL: www.invo.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/UK-standards-for-public-involvement-v6.pdf (accessed 15 October 2021).
Liew MS, Zhang J, See J, Ong YL. Usability challenges for health and wellness mobile apps: mixed-methods study among mhealth experts and consumers. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019;7:e12160. URL: https://mhealth.jmir.org/2019/1/e12160/ (accessed 2 August 2021).
Hirschtritt ME, Hirschtritt DB. Improving usability of health information technology. JAMA 2019;322:364–5. URL: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2738538 (accessed 2 August 2021).
Crocker JC, Boylan AM, Bostock J, Locock L. Is it worth it? Patient and public views on the impact of their involvement in health research and its assessment: a UK-based qualitative interview study. Health Expect 2017;20:519–28.
Staniszewska S, Adebajo A, Barber R, Beresford P, Brady LM, Brett J, et al. Developing the evidence base of patient and public involvement in health and social care research: the case for measuring impact. Int J Consum Stud 2011;35:628–32. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01020.x (accessed 3 August 2021).
Boaz A, Biri D, McKevitt C. Rethinking the relationship between science and society: has there been a shift in attitudes to patient and public involvement and public engagement in science in the United Kingdom? Health Expect 2016;19:592–601. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/hex.12295 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Boylan AM, Locock L, Thomson R, Staniszewska S. ‘About sixty per cent I want to do it’: health researchers’ attitudes to, and experiences of, patient and public involvement (PPI) – a qualitative interview study. Health Expect 2019;22:721–30. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/hex.12883 (accessed 3 August 2021).
Holmes L, Cresswell K, Williams S, Parsons S, Keane A, Wilson C, et al. Innovating public engagement and patient involvement through strategic collaboration and practice. Res Involv Engagem 2019;5:1–12. URL: https://researchinvolvement.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40900-019-0160-4 (accessed 27 October 2021).
McCarron TL, Clement F, Rasiah J, Moran C, Moffat K, Gonzalez A, et al. Patients as partners in health research: a scoping review. Health Expect 2021;24:1378–90. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/hex.13272 (accessed 27 October 2021).
Bate P, Robert G. Experience-based design: from redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient. Qual Saf Health Care 2006;15:307–10. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17074863/ (accessed 3 August 2021).
MacDonald C. Understanding participatory action research: a qualitative research methodology option. Can J Action Res 2012;13:34–50. URL: https://journals.nipissingu.ca/index.php/cjar/article/view/37 (accessed 3 August 2021).
Baum F, MacDougall C, Smith D. Participatory action research. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006;60:854–7. URL: https://jech.bmj.com/content/60/10/854 (accessed 3 August 2021).
Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative Methods for Health Research. 2018. URL: https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/qualitative-methods-for-health-research/book254905 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Locock L, Kirkpatrick S, Brading L, Sturmey G, Cornwell J, Churchill N, Robert G. Involving service users in the qualitative analysis of patient narratives to support healthcare quality improvement. Res Involv Engagem 2019;5:1–11. URL: https://researchinvolvement.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40900-018-0133-z (accessed 15 October 2021).
Creswell J. A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2014.
Fitbit Official Site for Activity Trackers and More. URL: www.fitbit.com/ (accessed 2 August 2021).
Redfern OC, Griffiths P, Maruotti A, Saucedo AR, Smith GB; Missed Care Study Group. The association between nurse staffing levels and the timeliness of vital signs monitoring: a retrospective observational study in the UK. BMJ Open 2019;9:e032157. URL: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/9/e032157 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Jones NA, Ross H, Lynam T, Perez P, Leitch A. Mental models: an interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecol Soc 2011;16:46.
Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Papoutsi C, Lynch J, Hughes G, A’Court C, et al. Beyond adoption: a new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. J Med Internet Res 2017;19:e367. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29092808/ (accessed 15 October 2021).
Rogers, EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th edn. New York, NY: Free Press, 2003. ISBN: 9780743222099.
Spångfors M, Molt M, Samuelson K. National Early Warning Score: a survey of registered nurses’ perceptions, experiences and barriers. J Clin Nurs 2020;29:1187–94. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jocn.15167 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Petersen JA, Rasmussen LS, Rydahl-Hansen S. Barriers and facilitating factors related to use of early warning score among acute care nurses: a qualitative study. BMC Emerg Med 2017;17:1–9. URL: https://bmcemergmed.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12873-017-0147-0 (accessed 15 October 2021).
Fox A, Elliott N. Early warning scores: a sign of deterioration in patients and systems. Nurs Manag (Harrow) 2015;22:26–31. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25806463/ (accessed 15 October 2021).
Dwamena F, Holmes‐Rovner M, Gaulden CM, Jorgenson S, Sadigh G, Sikorskii A, et al. Interventions for providers to promote a patient‐centred approach in clinical consultations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;12:CD003267. URL: www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD003267.pub2/full (accessed 15 October 2021).
ChoosingWisely UK. 2017. URL: www.choosingwisely.co.uk/ (accessed 3 August 2021).
General Medical Council. Decision Making and Consent: Guidance on Professional Standards and Ethics for Doctors. 2020. URL: www.gmc-uk.org/guidance (accessed 3 August 2021).
Kostakis I, Smith GB, Prytherch D, Meredith P, Price C, Chauhan A; Portsmouth Academic ConsortIum For Investigating COVID-19 (PACIFIC-19). Impact of the coronavirus pandemic on the patterns of vital signs recording and staff compliance with expected monitoring schedules on general wards. Resuscitation 2021;158:30–8.
Klepstad PK, Nordseth T, Sikora N, Klepstad P. Use of National Early Warning Score for observation for increased risk for clinical deterioration during post-ICU care at a surgical ward. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2019;15:315–22. URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S192630