Preoperative Mobile Health Data Improve Predictions of Recovery From Lumbar Spine Surgery.
Journal
Neurosurgery
ISSN: 1524-4040
Titre abrégé: Neurosurgery
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7802914
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Mar 2024
29 Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
15
11
2023
accepted:
24
01
2024
medline:
29
3
2024
pubmed:
29
3
2024
entrez:
29
3
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Neurosurgeons and hospitals devote tremendous resources to improving recovery from lumbar spine surgery. Current efforts to predict surgical recovery rely on one-time patient report and health record information. However, longitudinal mobile health (mHealth) assessments integrating symptom dynamics from ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and wearable biometric data may capture important influences on recovery. Our objective was to evaluate whether a preoperative mHealth assessment integrating EMA with Fitbit monitoring improved predictions of spine surgery recovery. Patients age 21-85 years undergoing lumbar surgery for degenerative disease between 2021 and 2023 were recruited. For up to 3 weeks preoperatively, participants completed EMAs up to 5 times daily asking about momentary pain, disability, depression, and catastrophizing. At the same time, they were passively monitored using Fitbit trackers. Study outcomes were good/excellent recovery on the Quality of Recovery-15 (QOR-15) and a clinically important change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference 1 month postoperatively. After feature engineering, several machine learning prediction models were tested. Prediction performance was measured using the c-statistic. A total of 133 participants were included, with a median (IQR) age of 62 (53, 68) years, and 56% were female. The median (IQR) number of preoperative EMAs completed was 78 (61, 95), and the median (IQR) number of days with usable Fitbit data was 17 (12, 21). 63 patients (48%) achieved a clinically meaningful improvement in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference. Compared with traditional evaluations alone, mHealth evaluations led to a 34% improvement in predictions for pain interference (c = 0.82 vs c = 0.61). 49 patients (40%) had a good or excellent recovery based on the QOR-15. Including preoperative mHealth data led to a 30% improvement in predictions of QOR-15 (c = 0.70 vs c = 0.54). Multimodal mHealth evaluations improve predictions of lumbar surgery outcomes. These methods may be useful for informing patient selection and perioperative recovery strategies.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
Neurosurgeons and hospitals devote tremendous resources to improving recovery from lumbar spine surgery. Current efforts to predict surgical recovery rely on one-time patient report and health record information. However, longitudinal mobile health (mHealth) assessments integrating symptom dynamics from ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and wearable biometric data may capture important influences on recovery. Our objective was to evaluate whether a preoperative mHealth assessment integrating EMA with Fitbit monitoring improved predictions of spine surgery recovery.
METHODS
METHODS
Patients age 21-85 years undergoing lumbar surgery for degenerative disease between 2021 and 2023 were recruited. For up to 3 weeks preoperatively, participants completed EMAs up to 5 times daily asking about momentary pain, disability, depression, and catastrophizing. At the same time, they were passively monitored using Fitbit trackers. Study outcomes were good/excellent recovery on the Quality of Recovery-15 (QOR-15) and a clinically important change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference 1 month postoperatively. After feature engineering, several machine learning prediction models were tested. Prediction performance was measured using the c-statistic.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 133 participants were included, with a median (IQR) age of 62 (53, 68) years, and 56% were female. The median (IQR) number of preoperative EMAs completed was 78 (61, 95), and the median (IQR) number of days with usable Fitbit data was 17 (12, 21). 63 patients (48%) achieved a clinically meaningful improvement in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference. Compared with traditional evaluations alone, mHealth evaluations led to a 34% improvement in predictions for pain interference (c = 0.82 vs c = 0.61). 49 patients (40%) had a good or excellent recovery based on the QOR-15. Including preoperative mHealth data led to a 30% improvement in predictions of QOR-15 (c = 0.70 vs c = 0.54).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Multimodal mHealth evaluations improve predictions of lumbar surgery outcomes. These methods may be useful for informing patient selection and perioperative recovery strategies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38551340
doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002911
pii: 00006123-990000000-01106
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences
ID : 1F31MH124291-01A
Informations de copyright
Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2024. All rights reserved.
Références
Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. New Engl J Med. 2008;358(8):794-810.
Gerbershagen HJ, Aduckathil S, van Wijck AJM, Peelen LM, Kalkman CJ, Meissner W. Pain intensity on the first day after surgery: a prospective cohort study comparing 179 surgical procedures. Anesthesiology. 2013;118(4):934-944.
Davis RE, Vincent C, Henley A, McGregor A. Exploring the care experience of patients undergoing spinal surgery: a qualitative study. J Eval Clin Pract. 2013;19(1):132-138.
Greenberg JK, Kelly MP, Landman JM, et al. Individual differences in postoperative recovery trajectories for adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2022;37(3):429-438.
Accardi-Ravid M, Eaton L, Meins A, et al. A qualitative descriptive study of patient experiences of pain before and after spine surgery. Pain Med. 2020;21(3):604-612.
McNair AGK, MacKichan F, Donovan JL, et al. What surgeons tell patients and what patients want to know before major cancer surgery: a qualitative study. BMC Cancer. 2016;16(1):258.
McGirt MJ, Parker SL, Chotai S, et al. Predictors of extended length of stay, discharge to inpatient rehab, and hospital readmission following elective lumbar spine surgery: introduction of the Carolina-Semmes Grading Scale. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;27(4):382-390.
Kanaan SF, Waitman LR, Yeh H-W, Arnold PM, Burton DC, Sharma NK. Structural equation model analysis of the length-of-hospital stay after lumbar spine surgery. Spine J official J North Am Spine Soc. 2015;15(4):612-621.
Siccoli A, de Wispelaere MP, Schröder ML, Staartjes VE. Machine learning-based preoperative predictive analytics for lumbar spinal stenosis. Neurosurg Focus. 2019;46(5):E5.
Mavros MN, Athanasiou S, Gkegkes ID, Polyzos KA, Peppas G, Falagas ME. Do psychological variables affect early surgical recovery? PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e20306.
Seebach CL, Kirkhart M, Lating JM, et al. Examining the role of positive and negative affect in recovery from spine surgery. Pain. 2012;153(3):518-525.
Archer KR, Wegener ST, Seebach C, et al. The effect of fear of movement beliefs on pain and disability after surgery for lumbar and cervical degenerative conditions. Spine. 2011;36(19):1554-1562.
Schneider S, Junghaenel DU, Broderick JE, Ono M, May M, Stone AA. II. Indices of pain intensity derived from ecological momentary assessments and their relationships with patient functioning: an individual patient data meta-analysis. J Pain. 2021;22(4):371-385.
Rost S, Van Ryckeghem DML, Koval P, Sütterlin S, Vögele C, Crombez G. Affective instability in patients with chronic pain: a diary approach. Pain. 2016;157(8):1783-1790.
Jacobson NC, Weingarden H, Wilhelm S. Digital biomarkers of mood disorders and symptom change. NPJ Digital Med. 2019;2(1):3.
Low CA, Li M, Vega J, et al. Digital biomarkers of symptom burden self-reported by perioperative patients undergoing pancreatic surgery: prospective longitudinal study. JMIR Cancer. 2021;7(2):e27975.
Xu Z, Zahradka N, Ip S, et al. Evaluation of physical health status beyond daily step count using a wearable activity sensor. NPJ Digital Med. 2022;5(1):164.
Wang SB, Coppersmith DDL, Kleiman EM, et al. A pilot study using frequent inpatient assessments of suicidal thinking to predict short-term postdischarge suicidal behavior. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(3):e210591.
Czyz EK, King CA, Al-Dajani N, Zimmermann L, Hong V, Nahum-Shani I. Ecological momentary assessments and passive sensing in the prediction of short-term suicidal ideation in young adults. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(8):e2328005.
Lei C, Qu D, Liu K, Chen R. Ecological momentary assessment and machine learning for predicting suicidal ideation among sexual and gender minority individuals. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(9):e2333164.
Greenberg JK, Frumkin MR, Javeed S, et al. Feasibility and acceptability of a preoperative multimodal mobile health assessment in spine surgery candidates. Neurosurgery. 2023;92(3):538-546.
Kleif J, Gögenur I. Severity classification of the quality of recovery-15 score—an observational study. J Surg Res. 2018;225:101-107.
Amtmann D, Kim J, Chung H, Askew RL, Park R, Cook KF. Minimally important differences for patient reported outcomes measurement information system pain interference for individuals with back pain. J Pain Res. 2016;9:251-255.
Hung M, Saltzman CL, Kendall R, et al. What Are the MCIDs for PROMIS, NDI, and ODI instruments among patients with spinal conditions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476(10):2027-2036.
Ibaseta A, Rahman R, Andrade NS, et al. Determining validity, discriminant ability, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important differences for PROMIS in adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine. 2021;34(5):725-733.
Mori M, Dhruva SS, Geirsson A, Krumholz HM. Characterization of multi-domain postoperative recovery trajectories after cardiac surgery using a digital platform. NPJ Digital Med. 2022;5(1):192.
Knight SR, Ng N, Tsanas A, McLean K, Pagliari C, Harrison EM. Mobile devices and wearable technology for measuring patient outcomes after surgery: a systematic review. NPJ Digital Med. 2021;4(1):157.
Van Walraven C, Austin PC, Jennings A, Quan H, Forster AJ. A modification of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures into a point system for hospital death using administrative data. Med Care. 2009;47(6):626-633.
Subramaniam S, Aalberg JJ, Soriano RP, Divino CM. New 5-factor modified frailty index using American College of Surgeons NSQIP data. J Am Coll Surgeons. 2018;226(2):173-181.e8.
Asparouhov T, Hamaker EL, Muthén B. Dynamic structural equation models. Struct Equation Model Multidisciplinary J. 2018;25(3):359-388.
Hamaker EL, Asparouhov T, Brose A, Schmiedek F, Muthén B. At the frontiers of modeling intensive longitudinal data: dynamic structural equation models for the affective measurements from the COGITO study. Multivariate Behav Res. 2018;53(6):820-841.
Cos H, Li D, Williams G, et al. Predicting outcomes in patients undergoing pancreatectomy using wearable technology and machine learning: prospective cohort study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(3):e23595.
Zhang J, Li D, Dai R, et al. Predicting post-operative complications with wearables: a case study with patients undergoing pancreatic surgery. Proc ACM Interactive Mobile Wearable Ubiquitous Tech. 2022;6(2):1-27.
Jadhav A, Pramod D, Ramanathan K. Comparison of performance of data imputation methods for numeric dataset. Appl Artif Intell. 2019;33(10):913-933.
Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J Mach Learn Res. 2011;12:2825-2830.
Efron B, Tibshirani R. Improvements on cross-validation: the .632+ bootstrap method. J Am Stat Assoc. 1997;92(438):548-560.
Zhang JK, Greenberg JK, Javeed S, et al. Association between neighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage and patient-reported outcomes in lumbar spine surgery. Neurosurgery. 2023;92(1):92-101.
Dai R, Kannampallil T, Zhang J, Lv N, Ma J, Lu C. Multi-task learning for randomized controlled trials: a case study on predicting depression with wearable data. Proc ACM Interactive Mobile Wearable Ubiquitous Tech. 2022;6(2):1-23.
Low CA, Danko M, Durica KC, et al. A real-time mobile intervention to reduce sedentary behavior before and after cancer surgery: pilot randomized controlled trial. JMIR Perioper Med. 2023;6:e41425.
Basil GW, Sprau AC, Eliahu K, Borowsky PA, Wang MY, Yoon JW. Using smartphone-based accelerometer data to objectively assess outcomes in spine surgery. Neurosurgery. 2021;88(4):763-772.
Ahmad HS, Singh S, Jiao K, et al. Data-driven phenotyping of preoperative functional decline patterns in patients undergoing lumbar decompression and lumbar fusion using smartphone accelerometry. Neurosurg Focus. 2022;52(4):e4.
Stienen MN, Rezaii PG, Ho AL, et al. Objective activity tracking in spine surgery: a prospective feasibility study with a low-cost consumer grade wearable accelerometer. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):4939.
Boaro A, Leung J, Reeder HT, et al. Smartphone GPS signatures of patients undergoing spine surgery correlate with mobility and current gold standard outcome measures. J Neurosurg Spine. 2021;35(6):796-806.
Chauhan D, Ahmad HS, Hamade A, et al. Determining differences in perioperative functional mobility patterns in lumbar decompression versus fusion patients using smartphone activity data. Neurosurgery. Published online January 3, 2024. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002808.
doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002808
Prince SA, Adamo KB, Hamel ME, Hardt J, Connor Gorber S, Tremblay M. A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. The Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activity. 2008;5(1):56.
Voglis S, Ziga M, Zeitlberger AM, et al. Smartphone-based real-life activity data for physical performance outcome in comparison to conventional subjective and objective outcome measures after degenerative lumbar spine surgery. Brain Spine. 2022;2:100881.
Smuck M, Muaremi A, Zheng P, et al. Objective measurement of function following lumbar spinal stenosis decompression reveals improved functional capacity with stagnant real-life physical activity. Spine J. 2018;18(1):15-21.
Frimpong E, van der Jagt DR, Mokete L, et al. Improvements in objectively measured activity behaviors do not correlate with improvements in patient-reported outcome measures following total knee arthroplasty. The J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(3):712-719.e4.
Urbanek JK, Roth DL, Karas M, et al. Free-living gait cadence measured by wearable accelerometer: a promising alternative to traditional measures of mobility for assessing fall risk. Journals Gerontology Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2023;78(5):802-810.
Garduno AC, LaCroix AZ, LaMonte MJ, et al. Associations of daily steps and step intensity with incident diabetes in a prospective cohort study of older women: the OPACH study. Diabetes Care. 2022;45(2):339-347.
Frumkin MR, Greenberg JK, Boyd P, et al. Establishing the reliability, validity, and prognostic utility of the momentary pain catastrophizing scale for use in ecological momentary assessment research. J Pain. 2023;24(8):1423-1433.
Marrache M, Harris AB, Puvanesarajah V, et al. Persistent sleep disturbance after spine surgery is associated with failure to achieve meaningful improvements in pain and health-related quality of life. Spine J. 2021;21(8):1325-1331.
Carnevali L, Thayer JF, Brosschot JF, Ottaviani C. Heart rate variability mediates the link between rumination and depressive symptoms: a longitudinal study. Int J Psychophysiol. 2018;131:131-138.
Pizzoli SFM, Marzorati C, Gatti D, Monzani D, Mazzocco K, Pravettoni G. A meta-analysis on heart rate variability biofeedback and depressive symptoms. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):6650.
Forte G, Troisi G, Pazzaglia M, Pascalis VD, Casagrande M. Heart rate variability and pain: a systematic review. Brain Sci. 2022;12(2):153.
Ali FZ, Parsey RV, Lin S, Schwartz J, DeLorenzo C. Circadian rhythm biomarker from wearable device data is related to concurrent antidepressant treatment response. NPJ Digital Med. 2023;6(1):81.