Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence for Detection of Scaphoid and Distal Radius Fractures: A Systematic Review.

Artificial intelligence deep learning distal radius fracture imaging scaphoid fracture

Journal

The Journal of hand surgery
ISSN: 1531-6564
Titre abrégé: J Hand Surg Am
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7609631

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 23 08 2023
revised: 19 01 2024
accepted: 31 01 2024
medline: 29 3 2024
pubmed: 29 3 2024
entrez: 29 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To review the existing literature to (1) determine the diagnostic efficacy of artificial intelligence (AI) models for detecting scaphoid and distal radius fractures and (2) compare the efficacy to human clinical experts. PubMed, OVID/Medline, and Cochrane libraries were queried for studies investigating the development, validation, and analysis of AI for the detection of scaphoid or distal radius fractures. Data regarding study design, AI model development and architecture, prediction accuracy/area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC), and imaging modalities were recorded. A total of 21 studies were identified, of which 12 (57.1%) used AI to detect fractures of the distal radius, and nine (42.9%) used AI to detect fractures of the scaphoid. AI models demonstrated good diagnostic performance on average, with AUROC values ranging from 0.77 to 0.96 for scaphoid fractures and from 0.90 to 0.99 for distal radius fractures. Accuracy of AI models ranged between 72.0% to 90.3% and 89.0% to 98.0% for scaphoid and distal radius fractures, respectively. When compared to clinical experts, 13 of 14 (92.9%) studies reported that AI models demonstrated comparable or better performance. The type of fracture influenced model performance, with worse overall performance on occult scaphoid fractures; however, models trained specifically on occult fractures demonstrated substantially improved performance when compared to humans. AI models demonstrated excellent performance for detecting scaphoid and distal radius fractures, with the majority demonstrating comparable or better performance compared with human experts. Worse performance was demonstrated on occult fractures. However, when trained specifically on difficult fracture patterns, AI models demonstrated improved performance. AI models can help detect commonly missed occult fractures while enhancing workflow efficiency for distal radius and scaphoid fracture diagnoses. As performance varies based on fracture type, future studies focused on wrist fracture detection should clearly define whether the goal is to (1) identify difficult-to-detect fractures or (2) improve workflow efficiency by assisting in routine tasks.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38551529
pii: S0363-5023(24)00054-6
doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.01.020
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest No benefits in any form have been received or will be received related directly to this article.

Auteurs

Jacob F Oeding (JF)

School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN; Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gotenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. Electronic address: jacoboeding@gmail.com.

Kyle N Kunze (KN)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.

Caden J Messer (CJ)

School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN.

Ayoosh Pareek (A)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.

Duretti T Fufa (DT)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.

Nicholas Pulos (N)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Peter C Rhee (PC)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Classifications MeSH