The resilience of transplanted seagrass traits encourages detection of restoration success.
Effect size
Meadow decline
Plant recovery
Posidonia oceanica
Reference condition
Restoration effectiveness
Journal
Journal of environmental management
ISSN: 1095-8630
Titre abrégé: J Environ Manage
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0401664
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Mar 2024
28 Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
22
02
2024
revised:
19
03
2024
accepted:
19
03
2024
medline:
30
3
2024
pubmed:
30
3
2024
entrez:
29
3
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Restoration of coastal ecosystems, particularly those dominated by seagrasses, has become a priority to recover the important ecosystem services they provide. However, assessing restoration outcomes as a success or failure remains still difficult, probably due to the unique features of seagrass species and the wide portfolio of practices used on transplanting actions. Here, several traits (maximum leaf length, number of leaves, leaf growth rate per shoot, and leaf elemental carbon and nitrogen contents) of transplanted seagrass Posidonia oceanica were compared to reference meadows in five sites of Western Mediterranean Sea in which restoration were completed in different times. Results have evidenced the resilience of transplanted P. oceanica shoots within a few years since restoration, as traits between treatments changed depending on the elapsed time since settlement. The highlighted stability of the restoration time effect suggests that the recovery of the plants is expected in four years after transplanting.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38552518
pii: S0301-4797(24)00730-8
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120744
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
120744Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.