Qualitative study of perceptions of factors contributing to success or failure among participants in a US weight loss trial of financial incentives and environmental change strategies.

NUTRITION & DIETETICS PUBLIC HEALTH QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 Mar 2024
Historique:
medline: 30 3 2024
pubmed: 30 3 2024
entrez: 29 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The use of financial incentives and environmental change strategies to encourage health behaviour change is increasingly prevalent. However, the experiences of participants in incentive interventions are not well characterised. Examination of participant perceptions of financial incentives and environmental strategies can offer insights about how these interventions are facilitating or failing to encourage behaviour change. This study aimed to learn how participants in a randomised trial that tested financial incentives and environmental interventions to support weight loss perceived factors contributing to their success or failure in the trial. Qualitative study with one-time interviews of trial participants with high and low success in losing weight, supplemented by study records of incentive payments and weight loss. 24 trial participants (12 with substantial weight loss and 12 with no weight loss) stratified equally across the 4 trial arms (incentives, environmental strategies, combined and usual care) were interviewed. Transcribed interviews were coded and interpreted using an iterative process. Explanation development was completed using an abductive approach. Responses of trial participants who were very successful in losing weight differed in several ways from those who were not. Successful participants described more robust prior attempts at dietary and exercise modification, more active engagement with self-limitations, more substantial social support and a greater ability to routinise dietary and exercise changes than did participants who did not lose weight. Successful participants often stated that weight loss was its own reward, even without receiving incentives. Neither group could articulate the details of the incentive intervention or consistently differentiate incentives from study payments. A number of factors distinguished successful from unsuccessful participants in this intervention. Participants who were successful tended to attribute their success to intrinsic motivation and prior experience. Making incentives more salient may make them more effective for participants with greater extrinsic motivation. NCT02878343.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The use of financial incentives and environmental change strategies to encourage health behaviour change is increasingly prevalent. However, the experiences of participants in incentive interventions are not well characterised. Examination of participant perceptions of financial incentives and environmental strategies can offer insights about how these interventions are facilitating or failing to encourage behaviour change.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to learn how participants in a randomised trial that tested financial incentives and environmental interventions to support weight loss perceived factors contributing to their success or failure in the trial.
DESIGN METHODS
Qualitative study with one-time interviews of trial participants with high and low success in losing weight, supplemented by study records of incentive payments and weight loss.
PARTICIPANTS METHODS
24 trial participants (12 with substantial weight loss and 12 with no weight loss) stratified equally across the 4 trial arms (incentives, environmental strategies, combined and usual care) were interviewed.
ANALYTICAL APPROACH METHODS
Transcribed interviews were coded and interpreted using an iterative process. Explanation development was completed using an abductive approach.
RESULTS RESULTS
Responses of trial participants who were very successful in losing weight differed in several ways from those who were not. Successful participants described more robust prior attempts at dietary and exercise modification, more active engagement with self-limitations, more substantial social support and a greater ability to routinise dietary and exercise changes than did participants who did not lose weight. Successful participants often stated that weight loss was its own reward, even without receiving incentives. Neither group could articulate the details of the incentive intervention or consistently differentiate incentives from study payments.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
A number of factors distinguished successful from unsuccessful participants in this intervention. Participants who were successful tended to attribute their success to intrinsic motivation and prior experience. Making incentives more salient may make them more effective for participants with greater extrinsic motivation.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER BACKGROUND
NCT02878343.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38553057
pii: bmjopen-2023-078111
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078111
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02878343']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e078111

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: KGV is a part-owner of the consulting firm, VALHealth. He has received research funding from Hawaii Medical Services Association, not related to the current research.

Auteurs

Karen Glanz (K)

Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA kglanz@upenn.edu.

Collin Kather (C)

Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Annie Chung (A)

The Children's Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Ji Rebekah Choi (JR)

Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Kevin G Volpp (KG)

Medical Ethics and Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Justin Clapp (J)

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Classifications MeSH