Time, age, gender and cultural measurement invariance of the CASP-12, a measure of psychological quality of life in adulthood.
Adulthood
Ageing
Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE)
CASP-12 scale
Measurement invariance
Quality of life
Survey of Health
Journal
Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation
ISSN: 1573-2649
Titre abrégé: Qual Life Res
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9210257
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Mar 2024
30 Mar 2024
Historique:
accepted:
24
02
2024
medline:
30
3
2024
pubmed:
30
3
2024
entrez:
30
3
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Whereas Quality of Life in older populations has long been conceptualized in regards to health or illness, the Control, Autonomy, Self-Realization and Pleasure scale (CASP-12) focuses on the positive facets of aging. Although the CASP is a widely used scale, its measurement invariance has seldom been examined. The present study aims to ascertain the measurement invariance of the CASP-12 over a period of 10 years and between age, culture and gender. Secondary data analyses were conducted on the longitudinal data collected in four waves between 2006 and 2016-2017 of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe study (SHARE). The factorial validity of the CASP-12 was examined and its measurement invariance was tested with a sample of 3684 men and 4955 women aged 30-99 years, coming from 10 different European countries. Results showed a strong theoretical and empirical dimensionality of the CASP-12, a well as invariance of time (10 years), age and culture. It was also found that the scale is gender invariant at the strict level. These results were replicated with two more waves of SHARE, measured six years apart. This study replicates the CASP-12 dimensional structure, factorial structure and factor loadings. The scale has demonstrated to be a reliable and valid measurement of the positive aspects of quality of life to be used across time, age, gender and culture. The Autonomy dimension of the scale warrants further investigation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38553648
doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03639-7
pii: 10.1007/s11136-024-03639-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Références
WHO. (2022). Mental health: strengthening our response. WHO. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-strengthening-our-response
Rojo-Pérez, F., & Fernández-Mayoralas, G. (2021). Handbook of active ageing and quality of life: From concepts to applications. Springer.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-58031-5
Ferreira, M. C. G., Tura, L. F. R., da Silva, R. C., de Ferreira, M., & A. (2017). Social representations of older adults regarding quality of life. Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 70(4), 806–813. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0097
doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0097
pubmed: 28793112
Van Malderen, L., De Vriendt, P., Mets, T., & Gorus, E. (2016). Active ageing within the nursing home: A study in Flanders. Belgium. European Journal of Ageing, 13(3), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-016-0374-3
doi: 10.1007/s10433-016-0374-3
pubmed: 27610053
Steptoe, A., Deaton, A., & Stone, A. A. (2015). Subjective wellbeing, health, and ageing. The Lancet, 385(9968), 640–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61489-0
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61489-0
Holzhausen, M., & Martus, P. (2013). Validation of a new patient-generated questionnaire for quality of life in an urban sample of elder residents. Quality of Life Research, 22(1), 131–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0115-9
doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0115-9
pubmed: 22331512
Pequeno, N. P. F., de Cabral, N. L., Marchioni, D. M., Lima, S. C. V. C., & de Lyra, C. (2020). Quality of life assessment instruments for adults: A systematic review of population-based studies. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18(1), 1–13.
doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01347-7
Pérez-Rojo, G., Martín, N., Noriega, C., & López, J. (2018). Psychometric properties of the CASP-12 in a Spanish older community dwelling sample. Aging & Mental Health, 22(5), 700–708. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2017.1292208
doi: 10.1080/13607863.2017.1292208
Sexton, E., King-Kallimanis, B. L., Conroy, R. M., & Hickey, A. (2013). Psychometric evaluation of the CASP-19 quality of life scale in an older Irish cohort. Quality of Life Research, 22(9), 2549–2559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0388-7
doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0388-7
pubmed: 23504522
Hyde, M., Wiggins, R. D., Higgs, P., & Blane, D. B. (2003). A measure of quality of life in early old age: The theory, development and properties of a needs satisfaction model (CASP-19). Aging & Mental Health, 7(3), 186–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360786031000101157
doi: 10.1080/1360786031000101157
Hyde, M., Higgs, P., Wiggins, R. D., & Blane, D. (2015). A decade of research using the CASP scale: Key findings and future directions. Aging & Mental Health, 19(7), 571–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2015.1018868
doi: 10.1080/13607863.2015.1018868
Maslow, A. (1968). Some educational implications of the humanistic psychologies. Harvard Educational Review, 38(4), 685–696.
doi: 10.17763/haer.38.4.j07288786v86w660
Wiggins, R. D., Netuveli, G., Hyde, M., Higgs, P., & Blane, D. (2008). The Evaluation of a self-enumerated scale of quality of life (CASP-19) in the context of research on ageing: A combination of exploratory and confirmatory approaches. Social Indicators Research, 89(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9220-5
doi: 10.1007/s11205-007-9220-5
Oliver, A., Sentandreu-Mañó, T., Tomás, J. M., Fernández, I., & Sancho, P. (2021). Quality of life in European older adults of SHARE Wave 7: Comparing the old and the oldest-old. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(13), 2850. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132850
doi: 10.3390/jcm10132850
pubmed: 34199127
pmcid: 8268858
Tan, L. T., Østbye, T., Visaria, A., & Malhotra, R. (2022). Derivation, and establishment of the validity and reliability, of the CASP-11-SG quality of life scale among community-dwelling older adults. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03238-4
doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03238-4
pubmed: 36484947
pmcid: 9356923
Borrat-Besson, C., Ryser, V.-A., & Gonçalves, J. (2015). An evaluation of the CASP-12 scale used in the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) to measure Quality of Life among people aged 50. Lausanne: FORS.
Lima, F. M., Hyde, M., Chungkham, H. S., Correia, C., Siqueira Campos, A., Campos, M., & Petribu, K. (2014). Quality of life amongst older Brazilians: A cross-cultural validation of the CASP-19 into Brazilian-Portuguese. PLoS ONE, 9(4), e94289. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094289
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094289
pubmed: 24740240
pmcid: 3989195
Hamren, K., Chungkham, H. S., & Hyde, M. (2015). Religion, spirituality, social support and quality of life: Measurement and predictors CASP-12(v2) amongst older Ethiopians living in Addis Ababa. Aging & Mental Health, 19(7), 610–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2014.952709
doi: 10.1080/13607863.2014.952709
Wu, T.-Y., Chie, W.-C., Kuo, K.-L., Wong, W.-K., Liu, J.-P., Chiu, S.-T., & Blane, D. (2013). Quality of life (QOL) among community dwelling older people in Taiwan measured by the CASP-19, an index to capture QOL in old age. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 57(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2013.03.010
doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2013.03.010
pubmed: 23623028
Rodríguez-Blázquez, C., Ribeiro, O., Ayala, A., Teixeira, L., Araújo, L., & Forjaz, M. J. (2020). Psychometric properties of the CASP-12 scale in Portugal: An analysis using SHARE data. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186610
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186610
Bowling, A., & Stenner, P. (2011). Which measure of quality of life performs best in older age? A comparison of the OPQOL, CASP-19 and WHOQOL-OLD. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 65(3), 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2009.087668
doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.087668
Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294825
doi: 10.1007/BF02294825
von Faber, M., van der Bootsma Wiel, A., van Exel, E., Gussekloo, J., Lagaay, A. M., van Dongen, E., & Westendorp, R. G. J. (2001). Successful aging in the oldest old. Archives of Internal Medicine, 161(22), 2694. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.161.22.2694
doi: 10.1001/archinte.161.22.2694
Liu, Y., Millsap, R. E., West, S. G., Tein, J. Y., Tanaka, R., & Grimm, K. J. (2017). Testing measurement invariance in longitudinal data with ordered-categorical measures. Psychological Methods, 22(3), 486–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000075
doi: 10.1037/met0000075
pubmed: 27213981
Wu, H., & Estabrook, R. (2016). Identification of confirmatory factor analysis models of different levels of invariance for ordered categorical outcomes. Psychometrika, 81(4), 1014–1045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-016-9506-0
doi: 10.1007/s11336-016-9506-0
pubmed: 27402166
pmcid: 5458787
van de Schoot, R., Lugtig, P., & Hox, J. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(4), 486–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.686740
doi: 10.1080/17405629.2012.686740
Lee, S., Liu, M., & Hu, M. (2017). Relationship between future time orientation and item nonresponse on subjective probability questions: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(5), 698–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022117698572
doi: 10.1177/0022022117698572
pubmed: 28781381
pmcid: 5542685
Muthen, B., & Muthén, L. K. (2023). Mplus Language Addendum 8.9. Los Angeles.
Bowen, N. K., & Masa, R. D. (2015). Conducting measurement invariance tests with ordinal data: A guide for social work researchers. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 6(2), 229–249. https://doi.org/10.1086/681607
doi: 10.1086/681607
Pokropek, A., Davidov, E., & Schmidt, P. (2019). A monte carlo simulation study to assess the appropriateness of traditional and newer approaches to test for measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 26(5), 724–744. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1561293
doi: 10.1080/10705511.2018.1561293
Berg, A. I., Hoffman, L., Hassing, L. B., McClearn, G. E., & Johansson, B. (2009). What matters, and what matters most, for change in life satisfaction in the oldest-old? A study over 6 years among individuals 80+. Aging & Mental Health, 13(2), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860802342227
doi: 10.1080/13607860802342227
Smith, J., Borchelt, M., Maier, H., & Jopp, D. (2002). Health and well-being in the young old and oldest old. Journal of Social Issues, 58(4), 715–732. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00286
doi: 10.1111/1540-4560.00286
Ayala, A., Rodríguez-Blázquez, C., Calderón-Larrañaga, A., Beridze, G., Teixeira, L., Araújo, L., & Forjaz, M. J. (2021). Influence of active and healthy ageing on quality of life changes: Insights from the comparison of three european countries. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084152
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084152
pubmed: 34770082
pmcid: 8583112
Börsch-Supan, A., Brandt, M., Hunkler, C., Kneip, T., Korbmacher, J., Malter, F., Schaan, B., Stuck, S., & Zuber, S. (2013). Data resource profile: The survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe (SHARE). International Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyt088
doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt088
pubmed: 23778574
pmcid: 3780997
Börsch-Supan, A. (2022). Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) Wave 2. Release version: 8.0.0. SHARE-ERIC. Data set. https://doi.org/10.6103/SHARE.w2.800
doi: 10.6103/SHARE.w2.800
Bergmann, M., Kneip, T., De Luca, G., & Scherpenzeel A. (2019). Survey participation in the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), Wave 1-7. Based on Release 7.0.0. SHARE Working Paper Series 41-2019. Munich: MEA, Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy.
Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle: Selected papers. Psychological Issues, 1, 1–171.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across cultures. Sage.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture and Organizations Author ( s ): Geert Hofstede Source : International Studies of Management & Organization, Winter, 1980 / 1981. International Studies of Management & Organization, 10(4), 15–41.
doi: 10.1080/00208825.1980.11656300
Ronen, S., & Shenkar, O. (1985). Clustering countries on attitudinal dimensions: A review and synthesis. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 435–454. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1985.4278955
doi: 10.5465/amr.1985.4278955
Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2019). Structural equation modeling. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119422730
doi: 10.1002/9781119422730
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11(3), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
doi: 10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
Millsap, R. E., & Yun-Tein, J. (2004). Assessing factorial invariance in ordered-categorical measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(3), 479–515. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3903_4
doi: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3903_4
Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (2013). Mplus Language Addendum 7.1. Los Angeles.
Chen, F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504.
doi: 10.1080/10705510701301834
Sass, D. A., Schmitt, T. A., & Marsh, H. W. (2014). Evaluating Model Fit With Ordered Categorical Data Within a Measurement Invariance Framework: A Comparison of Estimators. Structural Equation Modeling, 21(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.882658
doi: 10.1080/10705511.2014.882658
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus Version 8.0. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
Chen, P.-Y., Wu, W., Garnier-Villarreal, M., Kite, B. A., & Jia, F. (2020). Testing Measurement Invariance with Ordinal Missing Data: A Comparison of Estimators and Missing Data Techniques. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 55(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2019.1608799
doi: 10.1080/00273171.2019.1608799
pubmed: 31099262
Graham, J. W. (2012). Missing data: Analysis and design. Springer Science & Business Media.
Kunzmann, U., Little, T. D., & Smith, J. (2000). Is age-related stability of subjective well-being a paradox? Cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence from the Berlin aging study. Psychology and Aging, 15(3), 511–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.15.3.511
doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.15.3.511
pubmed: 11014714
Kokko, K., Korkalainen, A., Lyyra, A.-L., & Feldt, T. (2013). Structure and continuity of well-being in mid-adulthood: A longitudinal study. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(1), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9318-y
doi: 10.1007/s10902-011-9318-y
Huang, X., Zhang, M., Fang, J., Zeng, Q., Wang, J., & Li, J. (2022). Classifying and characterizing the development of self-reported overall quality of life among the Chinese elderly: A twelve-year longitudinal study. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13314-6
doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13314-6
Lee, K. H., Xu, H., & Wu, B. (2020). Gender differences in quality of life among community-dwelling older adults in low- A nd middle-income countries: Results from the Study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE). BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8212-0
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8212-0
Alonso, J., Ferrer, M., Gandek, B., Ware, J. E., Jr., Aaronson, N. K., Mosconi, P., & Leplège, A. (2004). Health-related quality of life associated with chronic conditions in eight countries: Results from the international quality of life assessment (IQOLA) project. Quality of Life Research, 13(2), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QURE.0000018472.46236.05
doi: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000018472.46236.05
pubmed: 15085901
Kang, Y., McNeish, D. M., & Hancock, G. R. (2016). The role of measurement quality on practical guidelines for assessing measurement and structural invariance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(4), 533–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164415603764
doi: 10.1177/0013164415603764
pubmed: 29795877
Luong, R., & Flake, J. K. (2023). Measurement invariance testing using confirmatory factor analysis and alignment optimization: A tutorial for transparent analysis planning and reporting. Psychological Methods, 28(4), 905–924. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000441
doi: 10.1037/met0000441
pubmed: 35588078
McWilliam, C. L., Brown, J. B., Carmichael, J. L., & Lehman, J. M. (1994). A new perspective on threatened autonomy in elderly persons: The disempowering process. Social Science & Medicine, 38(2), 327–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(94)90402-2
doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90402-2
Tang, M., Wang, D., & Guerrien, A. (2021). The contribution of basic psychological need satisfaction to psychological well-being via autonomous motivation among older adults: A cross-cultural study in China and France. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(November), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.734461
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.734461
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-Determination Theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
doi: 10.1521/978.14625/28806
Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
pubmed: 7473027