Reliability of the carousel simulator for assessing labor cervical dilation in medical obstetrics education.
gynecology
labor
medical education
obstetrics
simulator
Journal
International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
ISSN: 1879-3479
Titre abrégé: Int J Gynaecol Obstet
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0210174
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Mar 2024
30 Mar 2024
Historique:
revised:
10
03
2024
received:
13
11
2023
accepted:
18
03
2024
medline:
30
3
2024
pubmed:
30
3
2024
entrez:
30
3
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
To determine the reliability of the Carousel simulator in medical education for obstetric examinations. Cervical dilation examination training in pregnant women exposes patients to additional uncomfortable and health-risk procedures, a gold standard, and does not objectively evaluate the medical student's competence. We studied the reliability of training internship medical students in obstetrics. Participating students were assigned to take the examination of digital assessment of the cervical dilation on the simulator. Classes performed 12 consecutive randomly blind predetermined cervical dilation examinations using the Carousel simulator. The exact answer and the answer with certainty within ±1 cm were registered and analyzed. Incorrect or outlier answers were considered with a cutoff of ≥2 cm from the dilation. A dispersion graph for each centimeter of dilation simulation was constructed. Sixty-six medical obstetricians took part, performing 396 examinations. Thus, we observed 49 outliers (12.37%) in simulated assessments. According to the analysis, we did not observe outliers from dilation 1 to 4 cm; dilation 7 to 9 cm had a higher index of outlier measurements. We did not consider any dilation simulation dispersion graphic as a null correlation. A strong correlation was seen in the dilation 1 to 6 cm and the dilation 10 cm. The dilations 7, 8, and 9 cm showed a weak correlation. The Carousel simulator model is a reliable method for student learning. The simulator is an essential study tool capable of reducing the embarrassment and possible harm caused by the excessive and repetitive number of in vivo digital vaginal examinations. Novel studies are proposed to improve the simulator device and method, mainly to estimate the adequate repetitions and training needed before in vivo practice.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Références
Sartorao Filho CI, Barbosa AMP, Rudge MV. The "Carousel": a new simulation model for assessing the female pelvic examination in medical education. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2021. doi:10.1002/ijgo.13953
Tuffnell DJ, Johnson N, Bryce F, Lilford RJ. Simulation of cervical changes in labour: reproducibility of expert assessment. Lancet. 1989;334(8671):1089‐1090.
Phelps JY, Higby K, Smyth MH, Ward JA, Arredondo F, Mayer AR. Accuracy and intraobserver variability of simulated cervical dilatation measurements. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173(3):942‐945.
Huhn KA, Brost BC. Accuracy of simulated cervical dilation and effacement measurements among practitioners. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(5):1797‐1799.
Buchmann EJ, Libhaber E. Accuracy of cervical assessment in the active phase of labor. BJOG. 2007;114(7):833‐837.
van Dessel T, Frijns JH, Kok FT, Wallenburg HC. Assessment of cervical dilatation during labor: a review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1991;41(3):165‐171. doi:10.1016/0028-2243(91)90019-H
Wiafe YA, Whitehead B, Venables H, Nakua EK. The effectiveness of intrapartum ultrasonography in assessing cervical dilatation, head station and position: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Ultrasound. 2016;24(4):222‐232. doi:10.1177/1742271X16673124