Neural response during prefrontal theta burst stimulation: interleaved TMS-fMRI of full iTBS protocols.

concurrent TMS-fMRI functional MRI (fMRI) interleaved iTBS-fMRI neuromodulation non-invasive brain stimulation transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

Journal

NeuroImage
ISSN: 1095-9572
Titre abrégé: Neuroimage
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9215515

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 13 11 2023
revised: 25 03 2024
accepted: 28 03 2024
medline: 31 3 2024
pubmed: 31 3 2024
entrez: 30 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Left prefrontal intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) has emerged as a safe and effective transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) treatment protocol in depression. Though network effects after iTBS have been widely studied, the deeper mechanistic understanding of target engagement is still at its beginning. Here, we investigate the feasibility of a novel integrated TMS-fMRI setup and accelerated echo planar imaging protocol to directly observe the immediate effects of full iTBS treatment sessions. In our effort to explore interleaved iTBS-fMRI feasibility, we hypothesize that TMS will induce acute BOLD signal changes in both the stimulated area and interconnected neural regions. Concurrent TMS-fMRI with full sessions of neuronavigated iTBS (i.e. 600 pulses) of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) was investigated in 18 healthy participants. In addition, we conducted four TMS-fMRI sessions in a single patient on long-term maintenance iTBS for bipolar depression to test the transfer to clinical cases. Concurrent TMS-fMRI was feasible for iTBS sequences with 600 pulses. During interleaved iTBS-fMRI, an increase of the BOLD signal was observed in a network including bilateral DLPFC regions. In the clinical case, a reduced BOLD response was found in the left DLPFC and the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, with high variability across individual sessions. Full iTBS sessions as applied for the treatment of depressive disorders can be established in the interleaved iTBS-fMRI paradigm. In the future, this experimental approach could be valuable in clinical samples, for demonstrating target engagement by iTBS protocols and investigating their mechanisms of therapeutic action.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Left prefrontal intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) has emerged as a safe and effective transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) treatment protocol in depression. Though network effects after iTBS have been widely studied, the deeper mechanistic understanding of target engagement is still at its beginning. Here, we investigate the feasibility of a novel integrated TMS-fMRI setup and accelerated echo planar imaging protocol to directly observe the immediate effects of full iTBS treatment sessions.
OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS OBJECTIVE
In our effort to explore interleaved iTBS-fMRI feasibility, we hypothesize that TMS will induce acute BOLD signal changes in both the stimulated area and interconnected neural regions.
METHODS METHODS
Concurrent TMS-fMRI with full sessions of neuronavigated iTBS (i.e. 600 pulses) of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) was investigated in 18 healthy participants. In addition, we conducted four TMS-fMRI sessions in a single patient on long-term maintenance iTBS for bipolar depression to test the transfer to clinical cases.
RESULTS RESULTS
Concurrent TMS-fMRI was feasible for iTBS sequences with 600 pulses. During interleaved iTBS-fMRI, an increase of the BOLD signal was observed in a network including bilateral DLPFC regions. In the clinical case, a reduced BOLD response was found in the left DLPFC and the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, with high variability across individual sessions.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Full iTBS sessions as applied for the treatment of depressive disorders can be established in the interleaved iTBS-fMRI paradigm. In the future, this experimental approach could be valuable in clinical samples, for demonstrating target engagement by iTBS protocols and investigating their mechanisms of therapeutic action.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38554783
pii: S1053-8119(24)00091-0
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120596
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

120596

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest This work is a part of K-YC's Ph.D. program at Munich Medical Research School. YM-T received remuneration from neuroCare Group AG as a part-time office worker. FP is a member of the European Scientific Advisory Board of Brainsway Inc., Jerusalem, Israel, and the International Scientific Advisory Board of Sooma, Helsinki, Finland. He has received speaker's honoraria from Mag&More GmbH, the neuroCare Group, Munich, Germany, and Brainsway Inc. His lab has received support with equipment from neuroConn GmbH, Ilmenau, Germany, Mag&More GmbH and Brainsway Inc. MT, A-LS, PT, MC, UV, BH, ED, AT, LB, & DK reported no potential conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Kai-Yen Chang (KY)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging Core Unit Munich - NICUM, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany.

Martin Tik (M)

High Field MR Center, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Brain Stimulation Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, USA. Electronic address: mtik@stanford.edu.

Yuki Mizutani-Tiebel (Y)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging Core Unit Munich - NICUM, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany.

Anna-Lisa Schuler (AL)

Lise Meitner Research Group Cognition and Plasticity, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.

Paul Taylor (P)

Department of Psychology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Mattia Campana (M)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging Core Unit Munich - NICUM, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany.

Ulrike Vogelmann (U)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany.

Barbara Huber (B)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany.

Esther Dechantsreiter (E)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany.

Axel Thielscher (A)

Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark; Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Denmark.

Lucia Bulubas (L)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging Core Unit Munich - NICUM, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany.

Frank Padberg (F)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging Core Unit Munich - NICUM, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany.

Daniel Keeser (D)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging Core Unit Munich - NICUM, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: daniel.keeser@med.uni-muenchen.de.

Classifications MeSH