Comparison of the accuracy of different types of bite recordings - an in vitro study.
Bite
Bite recordings
Jaw position
Jaw relation
Wax recording
Journal
Clinical oral investigations
ISSN: 1436-3771
Titre abrégé: Clin Oral Investig
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9707115
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Apr 2024
01 Apr 2024
Historique:
received:
30
09
2023
accepted:
26
03
2024
medline:
1
4
2024
pubmed:
1
4
2024
entrez:
31
3
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Reconstruction of a three-dimensional jaw position determined by a bite recording is an important aspect of prosthetic therapy. Different materials are used for this purpose. In the dental technical workflow, recordings are used to mount a lower jaw cast in a patient-like spatial position relative to the upper jaw cast. We evaluated the accuracy of positioning under the influence of different jaw positions and materials. In an experimental setup, comprising an articulator, a pair of metal casts, and an optoelectronic measurement system, the spatial position of the incisal point and two condylar points were measured. To evaluate the accuracy of repeated repositioning of casts in the technical workflow, 324 measurements were taken from 108 recordings, consisting of silicone bite-stops made of addition curing silicone with 95 shore hardness, acrylic wafers, and wax recordings. The recordings were obtained in four jaw relations differing in vertical and protrusive components. Of the three materials/material combinations examined, silicone showed the most consistent results across all measurements, followed by the acrylic wafer system, and then wax recordings. Generally, recordings with smaller gaps between the jaws and no protrusive components showed greater deviations compared to jaw positions with greater protrusion and higher vertical dimensions. To achieve reliable model mounting with high accuracy, recordings should include the use of a frontal jig and four small recording platelets made of silicone, especially if only a slight elevation of the vertical dimension is needed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38556612
doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05637-y
pii: 10.1007/s00784-024-05637-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
233Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Türp JC, Schindler HJ, Rodiger O, Smeekens S, Marinello CP (2006) [Vertical and horizontal jaw relations in reconstructive dentistry. A critical review]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 116:403–417
pubmed: 16708525
Keshvad A, Winstanley RB (2001) An appraisal of the literature on centric relation. Part III. J Oral Rehabil 28:55–63
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00654.x
pubmed: 11298910
Weffort SY, de Fantini SM (2010) Condylar displacement between centric relation and maximum intercuspation in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. Angle Orthod 80:835–842
doi: 10.2319/090909-510.1
pubmed: 20578853
pmcid: 8939028
Böhm A, Rammelberg P, May H-C, Pho Duc J-M, Pospiech P, Gernet W (1995) Direkte dreidimensionale elektronische Kondylenpositionsanalyse zur Bestimmung von RKP-IKP-Diskrepanzen. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 50:35–39
Utz KH, Duvenbeck H, Oettershagen K (1990) Distanz zwischen terminaler Scharnierachsenposition und Interkuspidationsposition im Kiefergelenkbereich. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 100:42–4s9
pubmed: 2300795
Kantor ME, Silverman SI, Garfinkel L (1972) Centric-relation recording techniques–a comparative investigation. J Prosthet Dent 28:593–600
doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(72)90107-2
pubmed: 4508482
Lundeen HC (1974) Centric relation records: the effect of muscle action. J Prosthet Dent 31:244–253
doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(74)90191-7
pubmed: 4521343
Smith HF Jr. (1975) A comparison of empirical centric relation records with location of terminal hinge axis and apex of the gothic arch tracing. J Prosthet Dent 33:511–520
doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(75)80163-6
pubmed: 1055228
Simon RL, Nicholls JI (1980) Variability of passively recorded centric relation. J Prosthet Dent 44:21–26
doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(80)90040-2
pubmed: 6929920
Winstanley RB (1985) The hinge-axis: a review of the literature. J Oral Rehabil 12:135–159
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1985.tb00630.x
pubmed: 3886864
Sindledecker L (1981) Effect of different centric relation registrations on the pantographic representation of centric relation. J Prosthet Dent 46:271–279
doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(81)90212-2
pubmed: 6943337
Piehslinger E, Celar A, Celar R, Jager W, Slavicek R (1993) Reproducibility of the condylar reference position. J Orofac Pain 7:68–75
pubmed: 8467299
Utz KH, Muller F, Luckerath W, Fuss E, Koeck B (2002) Accuracy of check-bite registration and centric condylar position. J Oral Rehabil 29:458–466
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00864.x
pubmed: 12028494
Woda A, Pionchon P, Palla S (2001) Regulation of mandibular postures: mechanisms and clinical implications. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 12:166–178
doi: 10.1177/10454411010120020601
pubmed: 11345526
Hellmann D, Etz E, Giannakopoulos NN, Rammelsberg P, Schmitter M, Schindler HJ (2013) Accuracy of transfer of bite recording to simulated prosthetic reconstructions. Clin Oral Investig 17:259–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0682-8
doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0682-8
pubmed: 22302454
Hellmann D, Becker G, Fingerhut C, Schmitter M, Rammelsberg P, Schindler HJ (2014) Methods of determining centric relation: a comparative study. J Craniomandib Function 6:193–206
ISO 5725-1 2023. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results. Part 1: General principles and definitions
Hellmann D, Becker G, Giannakopoulos NN, Eberhard L, Fingerhut C, Rammelsberg P, Schindler HJ (2014) Precision of jaw-closing movements for different jaw gaps. Eur J Oral Sci 122:49–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12100
doi: 10.1111/eos.12100
pubmed: 24215119
Hellmann D, Türp JC (2022) Interocclusal Registration in Splint Therapie. In: Schindler HJ, Türp JC (eds) Book title. Quintessence Publishing, Berlin
Reusch D, Landeweer GG, Feyen J (2015) Das Zentrikregistrat. Quintessenz 66:1–10
Wieckiewicz M, Grychowska N, Zietek M, Wieckiewicz W (2016) Evaluation of the Elastic properties of Thirteen Silicone Interocclusal Recording materials. Biomed Res Int 2016:7456046. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7456046
doi: 10.1155/2016/7456046
pubmed: 27747239
pmcid: 5056310
Michalakis KX, Pissiotis A, Anastasiadou V, Kapari D (2004) An experimental study on particular physical properties of several interocclusal recording media. Part I: consistency prior to setting. J Prosthodont 13:42–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04005.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04005.x
pubmed: 15032895
Michalakis KX, Pissiotis A, Anastasiadou V, Kapari D (2004) An experimental study on particular physical properties of several interocclusal recording media. Part II: Linear dimensional change and accompanying weight change. J Prosthodont 13:150–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04024.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04024.x
pubmed: 15345014
Michalakis KX, Pissiotis A, Anastasiadou V, Kapari D (2004) An experimental study on particular physical properties of several interocclusal recording media. Part III: resistance to compression after setting. J Prosthodont 13:233–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04038.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04038.x
pubmed: 15610544
Nagrath R, Lahori M, Kumar V, Gupta V (2014) A comparative study to evaluate the Compression Resistance of different Interocclusal Recording materials: an in Vitro Study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 14:76–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-014-0369-8
doi: 10.1007/s13191-014-0369-8
pubmed: 26199495
pmcid: 4502032