Outcomes of minimal access cytoreductive surgery (M-CRS) and HIPEC/EPIC vs. open cytoreductive surgery (O-CRS) and HIPEC/EPIC in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies: a meta-analysis.

EPIC HIPEC cytoreductive surgery laparoscopic meta-analysis minimal access surgery

Journal

Pleura and peritoneum
ISSN: 2364-768X
Titre abrégé: Pleura Peritoneum
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101710063

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 08 06 2023
accepted: 15 01 2024
medline: 1 4 2024
pubmed: 1 4 2024
entrez: 1 4 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Minimal Access Surgery (MAS) has shown better peri-operative outcomes with equivalent oncological outcomes in gastrointestinal and thoracic oncology. Open CRS (O-CRS) procedure accompanies inevitable and significant surgical morbidity in patients. The aim of the review article is to compare outcomes of M-CRS and HIPEC/EPIC with open procedure in peritoneal surface malignancies. Comprehensive search of databases was done and total 2,807 articles were found (2793-PubMed and 14-Cochrane review). PRISMA flow chart was prepared and 14 articles were selected. Meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines using random-effects model (DerSimonian Laird) and fixed effect model. Publication bias was tested with Funnel plot and Egger's regression test. Quality of studies was assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Patients in both groups [total (732), M-CRS(319), O-CRS(413)] were similar in demographic characteristics. Peri-operative outcomes were significantly better in M-CRS group in terms of blood loss SMD=-2.379, p<0.001 (95 % CI -2.952 to -1.805), blood transfusion RR=0.598, p=0.011 (95 % CI 0.402 to 0.889), bowel recovery SMD=-0.843, p=0.01 (95 % CI -1.487 to -0.2), hospital stay SMD=-2.348, p<0.001 (95 % CI -3.178 to -1.519) and total morbidity RR=0.538, p<0.001 (95 % CI 0.395 to 0.731). Duration of surgery SMD=-0.0643 (95 % CI -0.993 to 0.865, p=0.892) and CC0 score RR=1.064 (95 % CI 0.992 to 1.140, p=0.083) had no significant difference. Limited studies which evaluated survival showed similar outcomes. This meta-analysis shows that M-CRS and HIPEC/EPIC is feasible and has better peri-operative outcomes compared to open procedure in patients with limited peritoneal carcinoma index (PCI) peritoneal surface malignancies. Survival outcomes were not calculated. Further studies are warranted in this regard.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38558870
doi: 10.1515/pp-2023-0017
pii: pp-2023-0017
pmc: PMC10980983
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

1-13

Informations de copyright

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interests.

Auteurs

Ajinkya Pawar (A)

Department of Surgical Oncology, GCRI, Ahmedabad, India.

Vikas Warikoo (V)

Department of Surgical Oncology, GCRI, Ahmedabad, India.

Abhijeet Salunke (A)

Department of Surgical Oncology, GCRI, Ahmedabad, India.

Mohit Sharma (M)

Department of Surgical Oncology, GCRI, Ahmedabad, India.

Shashank Pandya (S)

Department of Surgical Oncology, GCRI, Ahmedabad, India.

Amol Bhardwaj (A)

Department of Surgical Oncology, GCRI, Ahmedabad, India.

Sandeep Ks (S)

Department of Surgical Oncology, GCRI, Ahmedabad, India.

Jebin Aaron (J)

Department of Surgical Oncology, GCRI, Ahmedabad, India.

Classifications MeSH