Pre- and post-implementation protocol for non-operative management of grade III-V splenic injuries: An observational study.

Blunt abdominal trauma Blunt splenic injury Non-operative management Splenic arterial embolization

Journal

Heliyon
ISSN: 2405-8440
Titre abrégé: Heliyon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672560

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 19 07 2023
revised: 15 03 2024
accepted: 19 03 2024
medline: 1 4 2024
pubmed: 1 4 2024
entrez: 1 4 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Grade (III-V) blunt splenic injuries (BSI) in hemodynamically stable patients represent clinical challenges for successful non-operative management (NOM). In 2014, Our institution proposed a treatment protocol requiring splenic angiography and embolization for stable, intermediate, and high-grade BSI. It also included a follow-up CT scan for grade III BSI. We sought to assess the success rate of NOM in treating intermediate and high-grade BSI, following a standardized treatment protocol at a level 1 trauma center. An observational retrospective study was conducted. Data of patients with BSI from June 2011 to September 2019 were reviewed using the Qatar National Trauma Registry. Patients' demographics, CT scan and angiographic findings, grade of splenic injuries, and outcomes were analyzed. The pre- and post-implementation of treatment protocol periods were compared. During the study period, a total of 552 hemodynamically stable patients with BSI were admitted, of which 240 had BSI with grade III to V. Eighty-one patients (33.8%) were admitted in the pre-protocol implementation period and 159 (66.2%) in the post-protocol implementation period. The NOM rate increased from 50.6% in the pre-protocol group to 65.6% in the post-protocol group (p = 0.02). In addition, failure of the conservative treatment did not significantly differ in the two periods, while the requirement for blood transfusion dropped from 64.2% to 45.9% (p = 0.007). The frequency of CT scan follow-up (55.3% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.001) and splenic arterial embolization (32.7% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.001) in NOM patients increased significantly in the post-protocol group compared to the pre-protocol group. Overall mortality was similar between the two periods. However, hospital and ICU length of stay and ventilatory days were higher in the post-protocol group. NOM is an effective and safe treatment option for grade III-V BSI patients. Using standardized treatment guidelines for intermediate-to high-grade splenic injuries could increase the success rate for NOM and limit unnecessary laparotomy. Moreover, angioembolization is a crucial adjunct to NOM that could improve the success rate.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Grade (III-V) blunt splenic injuries (BSI) in hemodynamically stable patients represent clinical challenges for successful non-operative management (NOM). In 2014, Our institution proposed a treatment protocol requiring splenic angiography and embolization for stable, intermediate, and high-grade BSI. It also included a follow-up CT scan for grade III BSI. We sought to assess the success rate of NOM in treating intermediate and high-grade BSI, following a standardized treatment protocol at a level 1 trauma center.
Methods UNASSIGNED
An observational retrospective study was conducted. Data of patients with BSI from June 2011 to September 2019 were reviewed using the Qatar National Trauma Registry. Patients' demographics, CT scan and angiographic findings, grade of splenic injuries, and outcomes were analyzed. The pre- and post-implementation of treatment protocol periods were compared.
Results UNASSIGNED
During the study period, a total of 552 hemodynamically stable patients with BSI were admitted, of which 240 had BSI with grade III to V. Eighty-one patients (33.8%) were admitted in the pre-protocol implementation period and 159 (66.2%) in the post-protocol implementation period. The NOM rate increased from 50.6% in the pre-protocol group to 65.6% in the post-protocol group (p = 0.02). In addition, failure of the conservative treatment did not significantly differ in the two periods, while the requirement for blood transfusion dropped from 64.2% to 45.9% (p = 0.007). The frequency of CT scan follow-up (55.3% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.001) and splenic arterial embolization (32.7% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.001) in NOM patients increased significantly in the post-protocol group compared to the pre-protocol group. Overall mortality was similar between the two periods. However, hospital and ICU length of stay and ventilatory days were higher in the post-protocol group.
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
NOM is an effective and safe treatment option for grade III-V BSI patients. Using standardized treatment guidelines for intermediate-to high-grade splenic injuries could increase the success rate for NOM and limit unnecessary laparotomy. Moreover, angioembolization is a crucial adjunct to NOM that could improve the success rate.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38560121
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28447
pii: S2405-8440(24)04478-5
pmc: PMC10979267
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e28447

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Ismail Mahmood (I)

Department of Surgery, Trauma Surgery Section, Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC), Doha, Qatar.

Basil Younis (B)

Department of Surgery, Trauma Surgery Section, Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC), Doha, Qatar.

Mohammad Alabdallat (M)

Department of Surgery, Trauma Surgery Section, Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC), Doha, Qatar.

Saji Mathradikkal (S)

Department of Surgery, Trauma Surgery Section, Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC), Doha, Qatar.

Husham Abdelrahman (H)

Department of Surgery, Trauma Surgery Section, Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC), Doha, Qatar.

Ayman El-Menyar (A)

Department of Surgery, Trauma and Vascular Surgery, Clinical Research, HMC, Doha, Qatar.
Clinical Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Doha, Qatar.

Mohammad Asim (M)

Department of Surgery, Trauma and Vascular Surgery, Clinical Research, HMC, Doha, Qatar.

Mohammad Kasim (M)

Department of Surgery, Trauma Surgery Section, Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC), Doha, Qatar.

Monira Mollazehi (M)

Department of Surgery, Trauma Surgery, National Trauma Registry, HMC, Doha, Qatar.

Ammar Al-Hassani (A)

Department of Surgery, Trauma Surgery Section, Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC), Doha, Qatar.

Ruben Peralta (R)

Department of Surgery, Trauma Surgery Section, Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC), Doha, Qatar.

Sandro Rizoli (S)

Department of Surgery, Trauma Surgery Section, Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC), Doha, Qatar.

Hassan Al-Thani (H)

Department of Surgery, Trauma and Vascular Surgery, HMC, Doha, Qatar.

Classifications MeSH