Comparison of Time Taken in Conventional versus Active Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Conventional Learning curve Operative time Robotic assisted Total knee arthroplasty

Journal

Clinics in orthopedic surgery
ISSN: 2005-4408
Titre abrégé: Clin Orthop Surg
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101505087

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 05 03 2023
revised: 09 08 2023
accepted: 14 08 2023
medline: 2 4 2024
pubmed: 2 4 2024
entrez: 2 4 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Computer- and robotic-assisted total knee replacement procedures have been shown to improve the accuracy of the implant size. It also allows dynamic confirmation of the implant and limb alignment during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The major inhibition of the arthroplasty surgeon in adapting to the robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) is the extra time spent during the registration process and milling of the bone with the robot. The aim of the study was to ascertain the extra time spent during these 2 steps as compared to the conventional TKA (C-TKA). It is a prospective study involving 30 patients each in the conventional TKA and RA-TKA operated by the same surgical team. The patients were given a choice between the C-TKA and RA-TKA and consecutive 30 cases in each group were studied by an independent observer. In the C-TKA group, the time for the application of appropriate zigs and execution of the bone cuts and soft-tissue release was recorded whereas in the RA-TKA group, the time taken for fixation of the tibial and femoral arrays and bone registration and bone milling with robot and required soft-tissue release was measured. The preoperative patient characteristics were the same in both groups. The time taken in the C-TKA and RA-TKA groups was 24.77 ± 1.92 minutes and 25.03 ± 3.27 minutes, respectively, which is statistically insignificant ( The study findings show that RA-TKA does not take additional time than C-TKA.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Computer- and robotic-assisted total knee replacement procedures have been shown to improve the accuracy of the implant size. It also allows dynamic confirmation of the implant and limb alignment during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The major inhibition of the arthroplasty surgeon in adapting to the robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) is the extra time spent during the registration process and milling of the bone with the robot. The aim of the study was to ascertain the extra time spent during these 2 steps as compared to the conventional TKA (C-TKA).
Methods UNASSIGNED
It is a prospective study involving 30 patients each in the conventional TKA and RA-TKA operated by the same surgical team. The patients were given a choice between the C-TKA and RA-TKA and consecutive 30 cases in each group were studied by an independent observer. In the C-TKA group, the time for the application of appropriate zigs and execution of the bone cuts and soft-tissue release was recorded whereas in the RA-TKA group, the time taken for fixation of the tibial and femoral arrays and bone registration and bone milling with robot and required soft-tissue release was measured.
Results UNASSIGNED
The preoperative patient characteristics were the same in both groups. The time taken in the C-TKA and RA-TKA groups was 24.77 ± 1.92 minutes and 25.03 ± 3.27 minutes, respectively, which is statistically insignificant (
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
The study findings show that RA-TKA does not take additional time than C-TKA.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38562637
doi: 10.4055/cios23062
pmc: PMC10973624
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

259-264

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

CONFLICT OF INTEREST: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Auteurs

Sanjay Bhalchandra Londhe (SB)

Department of Orthopedics, CritiCare Asia Hospital, Mumbai, India.

Santosh Shetty (S)

Department of Orthopedics, CritiCare Asia Hospital, Mumbai, India.

Vijay Shetty (V)

Department of Orthopedics, CritiCare Asia Hospital, Mumbai, India.

Clevio Desouza (C)

Department of Orthopedics, CritiCare Asia Hospital, Mumbai, India.

Paras Banka (P)

Department of Orthopedics, Holy Spirit Hospital, Mumbai, India.

Nicholas Antao (N)

Department of Orthopedics, Holy Spirit Hospital, Mumbai, India.

Classifications MeSH