Intraoperative assessment of cochlear nerve functionality in various vestibular schwannoma scenarios: Lessons learned.
Auditory nerve test system (ANTS)
Cochlear implantation
Electric auditory brainstem response (EABR)
Neurofibromatosis type 2
Promontory Stimulation (PromStim)
Vestibular schwannoma
Journal
Hearing research
ISSN: 1878-5891
Titre abrégé: Hear Res
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7900445
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Mar 2024
23 Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
07
02
2024
revised:
21
03
2024
accepted:
22
03
2024
medline:
3
4
2024
pubmed:
3
4
2024
entrez:
2
4
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The use of cochlear implants (CIs) is on the rise for patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS). Besides CI following tumor resection, new scenarios such as implantation in observed and/or irradiated tumors are becoming increasingly common. A significant emerging trend is the need of intraoperative evaluation of the functionality of the cochlear nerve in order to decide if a CI would be placed. The purpose of this paper is to explore the experience of a tertiary center with the application of the Auditory Nerve Test System (ANTS) in various scenarios regarding VS patients. The results are compared to that of the studies that have previously used the ANTS in this condition. Patients with unilateral or bilateral VS (NF2) who were evaluated with the ANTS prior to considering CI in a tertiary center between 2021 and 2023 were analyzed. The presence of a robust wave V was chosen to define a positive electrical auditory brainstem response (EABR). Two patients underwent promontory stimulation (PromStim) EABR previous to ANTS evaluation. Seven patients, 2 NF-2 and 5 with sporadic VS were included. The initial scenario was simultaneous translabyrinthine (TL) tumor resection and CI in 3 cases while a CI placement without tumor resection was planned in 4 cases. The ANTS was positive in 4 cases, negative in 2 cases, and uncertain in one case. Two patients underwent simultaneous TL and CI, 1 patient simultaneous TL and auditory brainstem implant, 3 patients posterior tympanotomy with CI, and 1 patient had no implant placement. In the 5 patients undergoing CI, sound detection was present. There was a good correlation between the PromStim and ANTS EABR. The literature research yielded 35 patients with complete information about EABR response. There was one false negative and one false positive case; that is, the 28 implanted cases with a present wave V following tumor resection had some degree of auditory perception in all but one case. The ANTS is a useful intraoperative tool to asses CI candidacy in VS patients undergoing observation, irradiation or surgery. A positive strongly predicts at least sound detection with the CI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38564963
pii: S0378-5955(24)00050-9
doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.108997
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
108997Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest Miguel Díaz is employed at MED-EL as a clinical engineer; this function entails support during surgery. MED-EL was not involved in the study design, collection and analysis of data or the decision to submit it for publication.