Clinical Outcomes of Renal Transplant Recipients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Chronic kidney disease Dialysis Outcomes Percutaneous coronary intervention Renal transplant

Journal

Heart, lung & circulation
ISSN: 1444-2892
Titre abrégé: Heart Lung Circ
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 100963739

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 28 11 2023
revised: 17 01 2024
accepted: 18 01 2024
medline: 3 4 2024
pubmed: 3 4 2024
entrez: 2 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Clinical outcomes of patients with renal transplant (RT) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain poorly elucidated. Between 2014 and 2021, data were analysed for the following three groups of patients undergoing PCI enrolled in a multicentre Australian registry: (1) RT recipients (n=226), (2) patients on dialysis (n=992), and (3) chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], 30‒60 mL/min per 1.73 m RT recipients were younger than dialysis and patients with CKD (61±10 vs 68±12 vs 78±8.2 years, p<0.001). Patients with RT less frequently had severe left ventricular dysfunction compared with dialysis and CKD groups (6.7% vs 14% and 8.5%); however more, often presented with acute coronary syndrome (58% vs 52% and 48%), especially STEMI (all p<0.001). Patients with RT and CKD had lower rates of 30-day MACCE (4.4% and 6.8% vs 11.6%, p<0.001) than the dialysis group. Three-year survival was similar between RT and CKD groups, however was lower in the dialysis group (80% and 83% vs 60%, p<0.001). After adjustment, dialysis was an independent predictor of 30-day MACCE (odds ratio [OR] 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.44‒2.50, p<0.001), however RT was not (OR 0.91, CI 0.42‒1.96, p=0.802). Both RT (hazard ratio [HR] 2.07, CI 1.46‒2.95, p<0.001) and dialysis (HR 1.35, CI 1.02‒1.80, p=0.036) heightened the hazard of long-term mortality. RT recipients have more favourable clinical outcomes following PCI compared with patients on dialysis. However, despite having similar short-term outcomes to patients with CKD, the hazard of long-term mortality is significantly greater for RT recipients.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Clinical outcomes of patients with renal transplant (RT) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain poorly elucidated.
METHOD METHODS
Between 2014 and 2021, data were analysed for the following three groups of patients undergoing PCI enrolled in a multicentre Australian registry: (1) RT recipients (n=226), (2) patients on dialysis (n=992), and (3) chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], 30‒60 mL/min per 1.73 m
RESULTS RESULTS
RT recipients were younger than dialysis and patients with CKD (61±10 vs 68±12 vs 78±8.2 years, p<0.001). Patients with RT less frequently had severe left ventricular dysfunction compared with dialysis and CKD groups (6.7% vs 14% and 8.5%); however more, often presented with acute coronary syndrome (58% vs 52% and 48%), especially STEMI (all p<0.001). Patients with RT and CKD had lower rates of 30-day MACCE (4.4% and 6.8% vs 11.6%, p<0.001) than the dialysis group. Three-year survival was similar between RT and CKD groups, however was lower in the dialysis group (80% and 83% vs 60%, p<0.001). After adjustment, dialysis was an independent predictor of 30-day MACCE (odds ratio [OR] 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.44‒2.50, p<0.001), however RT was not (OR 0.91, CI 0.42‒1.96, p=0.802). Both RT (hazard ratio [HR] 2.07, CI 1.46‒2.95, p<0.001) and dialysis (HR 1.35, CI 1.02‒1.80, p=0.036) heightened the hazard of long-term mortality.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
RT recipients have more favourable clinical outcomes following PCI compared with patients on dialysis. However, despite having similar short-term outcomes to patients with CKD, the hazard of long-term mortality is significantly greater for RT recipients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38565437
pii: S1443-9506(24)00073-8
doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2024.01.033
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest There are no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Auteurs

Wayne C Zheng (WC)

Department of Cardiology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.

Nicole Evans (N)

Department of Cardiology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.

Diem Dinh (D)

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.

Jason E Bloom (JE)

Department of Cardiology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; Clinical Research Domain, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.

Angela L Brennan (AL)

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.

Jocasta Ball (J)

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; Clinical Research Domain, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.

Jeffrey Lefkovits (J)

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; Department of Cardiology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.

James A Shaw (JA)

Department of Cardiology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.

Christopher M Reid (CM)

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.

William Chan (W)

Department of Cardiology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; Clinical Research Domain, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.

Dion Stub (D)

Department of Cardiology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia. Electronic address: dion.stub@monash.edu.

Classifications MeSH