Validation of a Rule-Based ICD-10-CM Algorithm to Detect Fall Injuries in Medicare Data.

Claims data Medicare Advantage encounter data fee-for-service Medicare

Journal

The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences
ISSN: 1758-535X
Titre abrégé: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9502837

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 10 11 2023
medline: 3 4 2024
pubmed: 3 4 2024
entrez: 3 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Diagnosis-code-based algorithms to identify fall injuries in Medicare data are useful for ascertaining outcomes in interventional and observational studies. However, these algorithms have not been validated against a fully external reference standard, in ICD-10-CM, or in Medicare Advantage (MA) data. We linked self-reported fall injuries leading to medical attention (FIMA) from the Strategies to Reduce Injuries and Develop Confidence in Elders (STRIDE) trial (reference standard) to Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) and MA data from 2015-2019. We measured the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) based on sensitivity and specificity of a diagnosis-code-based algorithm against the reference standard for presence or absence of ≥1 FIMA within a specified window of dates, varying the window size to obtain points on the curve. We stratified results by source (FFS versus MA), trial arm (intervention versus control), and STRIDE's ten participating healthcare systems. Both reference standard data and Medicare data were available for 4941 (of 5451) participants. The reference standard and algorithm identified 2054 and 2067 FIMA, respectively. The algorithm had 45% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI], 43%-47%) and 99% specificity (95% CI, 99%-99%) to identify reference standard FIMA within the same calendar month. The AUC was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.78-0.81) and was similar by FFS or MA data source or trial arm, but showed variation among STRIDE healthcare systems (AUC range by healthcare system, 0.71 to 0.84). An ICD-10-CM algorithm to identify fall injuries demonstrated acceptable performance against an external reference standard, in both MA and FFS data.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Diagnosis-code-based algorithms to identify fall injuries in Medicare data are useful for ascertaining outcomes in interventional and observational studies. However, these algorithms have not been validated against a fully external reference standard, in ICD-10-CM, or in Medicare Advantage (MA) data.
METHODS METHODS
We linked self-reported fall injuries leading to medical attention (FIMA) from the Strategies to Reduce Injuries and Develop Confidence in Elders (STRIDE) trial (reference standard) to Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) and MA data from 2015-2019. We measured the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) based on sensitivity and specificity of a diagnosis-code-based algorithm against the reference standard for presence or absence of ≥1 FIMA within a specified window of dates, varying the window size to obtain points on the curve. We stratified results by source (FFS versus MA), trial arm (intervention versus control), and STRIDE's ten participating healthcare systems.
RESULTS RESULTS
Both reference standard data and Medicare data were available for 4941 (of 5451) participants. The reference standard and algorithm identified 2054 and 2067 FIMA, respectively. The algorithm had 45% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI], 43%-47%) and 99% specificity (95% CI, 99%-99%) to identify reference standard FIMA within the same calendar month. The AUC was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.78-0.81) and was similar by FFS or MA data source or trial arm, but showed variation among STRIDE healthcare systems (AUC range by healthcare system, 0.71 to 0.84).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
An ICD-10-CM algorithm to identify fall injuries demonstrated acceptable performance against an external reference standard, in both MA and FFS data.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38566617
pii: 7639451
doi: 10.1093/gerona/glae096
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America 2024. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.

Auteurs

David A Ganz (DA)

Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA; Los Angeles, CA.
Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center; Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System; Los Angeles, CA.

Denise Esserman (D)

Department of Biostatistics; Yale School of Public Health; New Haven, CT.

Nancy K Latham (NK)

Boston Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center; Research Program in Men's Health: Aging and Metabolism; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Boston, MA.

Michael Kane (M)

Department of Biostatistics; Yale School of Public Health; New Haven, CT.

Lillian C Min (LC)

Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan; Ann Arbor, MI and Ann Arbor VA Medical Center, Center for Clinical Management Research and Geriatric Research Education Clinical Center (GRECC); Ann Arbor, MI.

Thomas M Gill (TM)

Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine; New Haven, CT.

David B Reuben (DB)

Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA; Los Angeles, CA.

Peter Peduzzi (P)

Department of Biostatistics; Yale School of Public Health; New Haven, CT.

Erich J Greene (EJ)

Department of Biostatistics; Yale School of Public Health; New Haven, CT.

Classifications MeSH