Comparative Analysis of Various Materials Used for Mastoid Cavity Obliteration in Canal Wall Down Mastoid Surgery.

Bone dust Hydroxyapatite Mastoid obliteration Muscle flap

Journal

Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India
ISSN: 2231-3796
Titre abrégé: Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
Pays: India
ID NLM: 9422551

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 25 06 2023
accepted: 14 11 2023
pmc-release: 01 04 2025
medline: 3 4 2024
pubmed: 3 4 2024
entrez: 3 4 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To study the surgical result and efficacy of different methods of mastoid obliteration with cavity care. This prospective study included 60 patients who had cholesteatoma, conducted in the Department of Ear Nose and Throat (ENT), Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi from July 2015 to July 2017. The mastoid cavity was obliterated with either muscle flap/bone dust/hydroxyapatite. detailed history otoscopic examination was done pre-operatively and follow up were recorded at 1 month and 3 months in postoperative period. 60 patients were included, who underwent canal wall down mastoid surgery. each group muscle flap (group 1), bone dust (group 2) and hydroxyapatite (group 3) included 20 patients, age group 31-40 year with its maximum incidence of 43.3%, Preop PTA value were almost equal in all group but on comparison at 1 month in postoperative period significant improvement was present in group 1 versus 2(0.021) and group 2 versus 3(0.003) but not in group 1 versus 3. Although at 3 month there were significant improvement was present in all groups. The incidence of pain, discharge, giddiness and wax formation were markedly reduced and healing of cavities was early and better in obliterated cavities done by muscle flap and bone dust material as compared to hydroxyapatite cavities, at the end of 3 months. outcome and quality of life was better and almost equal in muscle flap and bone dust material group as compared to hydroxyapatite group.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38566632
doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-04364-2
pii: 4364
pmc: PMC10982262
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1586-1594

Informations de copyright

© Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interestNone, declared.

Auteurs

Sunita Meena (S)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Pacific Institute of Medical Sciences, Udaipur, Rajasthan 313015 India.

Rajesh Kumar (R)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh 221005 India.

Rakesh Kumar Meena (RK)

Department of Neurosurgery, Pacific Institute of Medical Sciences, Udaipur, Rajasthan 313015 India.

Classifications MeSH