Alternative community-led intervention to improve uptake of cataract surgery services in rural Tanzania-The Dodoma Community Cataract Acceptance Trial (DoCCAT): a protocol for intervention co-designing and implementation in a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Community-led Intervention Rural Tanzania Uptake Cataract services cRCT cataract surgery

Journal

Biology methods & protocols
ISSN: 2396-8923
Titre abrégé: Biol Methods Protoc
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101693064

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 13 12 2023
revised: 26 02 2024
accepted: 06 03 2024
medline: 3 4 2024
pubmed: 3 4 2024
entrez: 3 4 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Age-related lens opacification (cataract) remains the leading cause of visual impairment and blindness worldwide. In low- and middle-income countries, utilization of cataract surgical services is often limited despite community-based outreach programmes. Community-led research, whereby researchers and community members collaboratively co-design intervention is an approach that ensures the interventions are locally relevant and that their implementation is feasible and socially accepted in the targeted contexts. Community-led interventions have the potential to increase cataract surgery uptake if done appropriately. In this study, once the intervention is co-designed it will be implemented through a cluster-randomized controlled trial (cRCT) with ward as a unit of randomization. This study will utilise both the qualitative methods for co-designing the intervention and the quantitative methods for effective assessment of the developed community-led intervention through a cRCT in 80 rural wards of Dodoma region, Tanzania (40 Intervention). The 'intervention package' will be developed through participatory community meetings and ongoing evaluation and modification of the intervention based on its impact on service utilization. Leask's four stages of intervention co-creation will guide the development within Rifkin's CHOICE framework. The primary outcomes are two: the number of patients attending eye disease screening camps, and the number of patients accepting cataract surgery. NVivo version 12 will be used for qualitative data analysis and Stata version 12 for quantitative data. Independent and paired t-tests will be performed to make comparisons between and within groups. P-values less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38566775
doi: 10.1093/biomethods/bpae016
pii: bpae016
pmc: PMC10987207
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

bpae016

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Auteurs

Frank Sandi (F)

Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Dodoma Medical School, Dodoma, Tanzania.

Gareth Mercer (G)

Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Robert Geneau (R)

Division of Ophthalmology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Kenneth Bassett (K)

Department of Ophthalmology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Deogratius Bintabara (D)

Department of Community Medicine, The University of Dodoma Medical School, Dodoma, Tanzania.

Albino Kalolo (A)

Department of Public Health, St Francis University College of Health and Allied Sciences, Morogoro, Tanzania.

Classifications MeSH