Efficacy of adjuvant capecitabine in residual triple negative breast cancer: a multicenter observational Turkish Oncology Group (TOG) study.

Capecitabine breast cancer residual tumor toxicity triple negative

Journal

Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy
ISSN: 1744-7666
Titre abrégé: Expert Opin Pharmacother
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100897346

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Apr 2024
Historique:
medline: 3 4 2024
pubmed: 3 4 2024
entrez: 3 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by high rates of recurrence, especially in patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Capecitabine is being used as standard adjuvant treatment in residual TNBC. We aimed to investigate the real-life data regarding the efficacy of capecitabine in residual TNBC. In this retrospective multicenter study, TNBC patients with residual disease were evaluated. Patients, who received standard anthracycline and taxane-based NAC and adjuvant capecitabine were eligible. Overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS) and toxicity were analyzed. 170 TNBC patients with residual disease were included. Of these, 62.9% were premenopausal. At the time of analysis, the recurrence rate was 30% and death rate was 18%. The 3-year DFS and OS were 66% and 74%, respectively. In patients treated with adjuvant capecitabine, residual node positive disease stood out as an independent predictor of DFS ( The efficacy of capecitabine was found lower compared to previous studies. Selected patients may have further benefit from addition of capecitabine. The toxicity associated with capecitabine was found lower than anticipated.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND UNASSIGNED
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by high rates of recurrence, especially in patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Capecitabine is being used as standard adjuvant treatment in residual TNBC. We aimed to investigate the real-life data regarding the efficacy of capecitabine in residual TNBC.
DESIGN AND METHODS UNASSIGNED
In this retrospective multicenter study, TNBC patients with residual disease were evaluated. Patients, who received standard anthracycline and taxane-based NAC and adjuvant capecitabine were eligible. Overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS) and toxicity were analyzed.
RESULTS UNASSIGNED
170 TNBC patients with residual disease were included. Of these, 62.9% were premenopausal. At the time of analysis, the recurrence rate was 30% and death rate was 18%. The 3-year DFS and OS were 66% and 74%, respectively. In patients treated with adjuvant capecitabine, residual node positive disease stood out as an independent predictor of DFS (
CONCLUSION UNASSIGNED
The efficacy of capecitabine was found lower compared to previous studies. Selected patients may have further benefit from addition of capecitabine. The toxicity associated with capecitabine was found lower than anticipated.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38568074
doi: 10.1080/14656566.2024.2337261
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-8

Auteurs

Elif Şenocak Taşçı (EŞ)

Department of Medical Oncology, Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Yasin Kutlu (Y)

Department of Medical Oncology, Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Ömer Fatih Ölmez (ÖF)

Department of Medical Oncology, Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Arda Ulaş Mutlu (AU)

Department of Medicine, Acıbadem MAA University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Yasemin Gündoğdu (Y)

Department of Internal Medicine, Acıbadem MAA University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Mustafa Seyyar (M)

Department of Medical Oncology, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey.

Elif Şahin (E)

Department of Medical Oncology, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey.

Devrim Çabuk (D)

Department of Medical Oncology, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey.

Nargiz Majidova (N)

Department of Medical Oncology, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

İrem Uğurlu (İ)

Department of Medical Oncology, Sakarya University Research and Education Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey.

Ayşe Demirci (A)

Department of Medical Oncology, Sakarya University Research and Education Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey.

Dinçer Aydın (D)

Department of Medical Oncology, Derince Education and Research Hospital, Kocaeli, Turkey.

Eyüp Çavdar (E)

Department of Medical Oncology, Namık Kemal University, Tekirdağ, Turkey.

Selami Bayram (S)

Department of Medical Oncology, Antalya Education and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.

Nilgün Yıldırım (N)

Department of Medical Oncology, Fırat University Faculty of Medicine, Elazığ, Turkey.

Fatih Karataş (F)

Department of Medical Oncology, Karabük University Faculty of Medicine, Karabük, Turkey.

Melek Karakurt Eryılmaz (MK)

Meram Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.

Dilek Çağlayan (D)

Meram Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.

Serkan Menekşe (S)

Department of Medical Oncology, Manisa City Hospital, Manisa, Turkey.

Engin Kut (E)

Department of Medical Oncology, Manisa City Hospital, Manisa, Turkey.

Hacı Arak (H)

Department of Medical Oncology, Gaziantep University Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep, Turkey.

Murat Keser (M)

Department of Medical Oncology, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Veli Sunar (V)

Department of Medical Oncology, Aydın Atatürk Public Hospital, Aydın, Turkey.

Perihan Perkin (P)

Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Teoman Şakalar (T)

Department of Medical Oncology, Necip Fazıl City Hospital, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey.

Başak Oyan (B)

Department of Medical Oncology, Acıbadem MAA University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Özlem Sönmez (Ö)

Department of Medical Oncology, Acıbadem MAA University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Leyla Özer (L)

Department of Medical Oncology, Acıbadem MAA University, Istanbul, Turkey.

İbrahim Yıldız (İ)

Department of Medical Oncology, Acıbadem MAA University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Classifications MeSH