Science-informed Policy Making for Protecting People and the Environment from Radiation.
Journal
Health physics
ISSN: 1538-5159
Titre abrégé: Health Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985093R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Apr 2024
03 Apr 2024
Historique:
medline:
3
4
2024
pubmed:
3
4
2024
entrez:
3
4
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The process to arrive at the radiation protection practices of today to protect workers, patients, and the public, including sensitive populations, has been a long and deliberative one. This paper presents an overview of the US Environmental Protection Agency's (US EPA) responsibility in protecting human health and the environment from unnecessary exposure to radiation. The origins of this responsibility can be traced back to early efforts, a century ago, to protect workers from x rays and radium. The system of radiation protection we employ today is robust and informed by the latest scientific consensus. It has helped reduce or eliminate unnecessary exposures to workers, patients, and the public while enabling the safe and beneficial uses of radiation and radioactive material in diverse areas such as energy, medicine, research, and space exploration. Periodic reviews and analyses of research on health effects of radiation by scientific bodies such as the National Academy of Sciences, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, and the International Commission on Radiological Protection continue to inform radiation protection practices while new scientific information is gathered. As a public health agency, US EPA is keenly interested in research findings that can better elucidate the effects of exposure to low doses and low dose rates of radiation as applicable to protection of diverse populations from various sources of exposure. Professional organizations such as the Health Physics Society can provide radiation protection practitioners with continuing education programs on the state of the science and describe the key underpinnings of the system of radiological protection. Such efforts will help equip and prepare radiation protection professionals to more effectively communicate radiation health information with their stakeholders.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38568162
doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000001831
pii: 00004032-990000000-00140
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Health Physics Society.
Références
Administrative Procedure Act of 1946. 5 USC §551 et seq. (11 June 1946).
Ansari A. The role of radiation protection professionals in the landscape of low dose radiation. J Radiol Protect 39:1117–1122; 2019.
Ansari A, Kleinhans K, Boice JD. Potential health effects of low dose radiation and what it means to the practice of radiation protection. J Radiol Protect 39:E9–E13; 2019.
Atomic Energy Act of 1946 (McMahon Act), Pub. L. No. 79-585, 60 Stat. 755 (1 August 1946).
Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (as amended). 42 USC 2011 et seq. (30 August 1954).
Balter S, Hopewell JW, Miller DL, Wagner LK, Zelefsky MJ. Fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: a review of radiation effects on patients’ skin and hair. Radiol 254:326–341; 2010.
Bavley H. Shoe-fitting with x-ray. National Safety News 62:33, 107–111; 1950.
Clean Air Act of 1970 (as amended). 42 USC 7401 et seq. (31 December 1970).
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980. 42 USC 9601 et seq. (11 December 1980).
Covello VT. Risk communication, radiation, and radiological emergencies: strategies, tools, and techniques. Health Phys 101:511–530; 2011.
Dauer LT, Thornton RH, Hay JL, Balter R, Williamson MJ, St. Germain J. Fears, feelings, and facts: interactively communicating benefits and risks of medical radiation with patients. Am J Roentgenol 196:756–761; 2011.
Frame PW; R.W. Thomas and the Revigator [online]. 2023. Available at https://www.orau.org/health-physics-museum/collection/radioactive-quack-cures/jars/revigator-thomas-cone.html. Accessed 2 November 2023.
Health Physics Society. The US Health Physics Society 2024 strategic plan [online]. 2023. Available at http://hps.org/. Accessed 28 October 2023.
Herzig R. In the name of science: suffering, sacrifice, and the formation of American Roentgenology. Am Q 53:563–589; 2001.
International Commission on Radiological Protection. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. New York: Pergamon Press; now known as ICRP Publication 1; 1959.
International Commission on Radiological Protection. Low-dose extrapolation of radiation-related cancer risk. Oxford: Pergamon Press; ICRP Publication 99, Ann ICRP 35(4); 2005.
International Commission on Radiological Protection. Radiological protection of people and the environment in the event of a large nuclear accident. Oxford: Pergamon Press; ICRP Publication 146, Ann ICRP 49(4), 2020.
International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Volume 100 D: Radiation. Lyon, France: World Health Organization, IARC; 2012.
Jones CG. A review of the history of U.S. radiation protection regulations, recommendations, and standards. Health Phys 88:697–716; 2005.
Laurier D, Billarand Y, Klokov D, Leuraud K. The scientific basis for the use of the linear no-threshold (LNT) model at low doses and dose rates in radiological protection. J Radiol Protect 43:024003; 2023.
Mackenzie I. Breast cancer following multiple fluoroscopies. Br J Cancer 19:1–8; 1965.
Martinez NE, Jokisch DW, Dauer LT, Eckerman KF, Goans RE, Brockman JD, Tolmachev SY, Avtandilashvili M, Mumma MT, Boice JD, Leggett RW. Radium dial workers: back to the future. Int J Radiat Biol 98:750–768; 2022.
Martland HS, Conlon P, Kne JP. Some unrecognized dangers in the use and handling of radioactive substances: with especial reference to the storage of insoluble products of radium and mesothorium in the reticulo-enthothelial system. J Am Med Assoc 85:1769–1776; 1925.
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Approaches for integrating information from radiation biology and epidemiology to enhance low-dose health risk assessment. Bethesda, MD: NCRP; NCRP Report No. 186; 2020.
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Implications of recent epidemiologic studies for the linear-nonthreshold model and radiation protection. Bethesda, MD: NCRP; NCRP Commentary No. 27; 2018a.
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Management of exposure to ionizing radiation: radiation protection guidance for the United States. Bethesda, MD: NCRP; NCRP Report No. 180; 2018b.
National Research Council. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII—Phase 2. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006.
Pawel D, Boyd M. Studies of radiation health effects inform EPA actions. J Radiol Protect 39:S40–S56; 2019.
Rühm W, Cho K, Larsson C-M, Wojcik A, Clement C, Applegate K, Bochud F, Bouffler S, Cool D, Hirth G, Kai M, Laurier D, Liu S, Romanov S, Schneider T. Vancouver call for action to strengthen expertise in radiological protection worldwide. Radiat Environ Biophys 62:175–180; 2023.
Rühm W, Laurier D, Wakeford R. Cancer risk following low doses of ionising radiation—current epidemiological evidence and implications for radiological protection. Mutat Res Genetic Toxicol Environ Mutagen 873:503436; 2022.
Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974. 42 USC 300f et seq. (16 December 1974).
Sansare K, Khanna V, Karjodkar F. Early victims of x-rays: a tribute and current perception. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 40:123–125; 2011.
Simon SL, Kendall GM, Bouffler SD, Little MP. The evidence for excess risk of cancer and non-cancer disease at low doses and dose rates. Radiat Res 198:615–624; 2022.
Taylor LS. X-ray measurements and protection, 1913-1964. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; National Bureau of Standards Special Publication 625; 1981.
Taylor LS. Will radiation control be by reason or regulation? Health Phys 55:133–138; 1988.
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Annex C. Biological mechanisms relevant for the inference of cancer risks from low-dose and low-dose-rate radiation. Vienna: UNSCEAR; 2021.
US Environmental Protection Agency. Radiation protection at EPA: the first 30 years. Washington, DC: US EPA; No. EPA 402-B-00-001; 2000.
US Environmental Protection Agency. Guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment. Washington, DC: US EPA; No. EPA/630/P-03/001F; 2005.
US Environmental Protection Agency. PAG manual: protective action guides and planning guidance for radiological incidents. Washington, DC: US EPA; No. EPA-400/R-17/001; 2017.
Wakeford R, Balonov M Jr, JDB, Harrison JD, Niwa O, Preston RJ, Shore RE. The LNT risk model and radiological protection. J Radiol Protect 43:040201; 2023.
Walker JS. Permissible dose: a history of radiation protection in the twentieth century. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press; 2000.