An "On Demand" canakinumab regimen for treating children with Colchicine-Resistant familial Mediterranean fever - A multicentre study.
Canakinumab
Colchicine resistance
anti-IL-1
familial Mediterranean fever
Journal
International immunopharmacology
ISSN: 1878-1705
Titre abrégé: Int Immunopharmacol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 100965259
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Apr 2024
02 Apr 2024
Historique:
received:
07
10
2023
revised:
08
03
2024
accepted:
27
03
2024
medline:
4
4
2024
pubmed:
4
4
2024
entrez:
3
4
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Canakinumab, a human monoclonal antibody targeted at interleukin-1 beta, has demonstrated safety and efficacy in preventing familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) attacks among individuals with colchicine-resistant (crFMF). The manufacturer orders prescribe monthly subcutaneous injections. However, a subset of our patients is treated with an "canakinumab on demand " (COD) strategy, with wider intervals between drug administrations. Therefore, we aimed to compare disease activity and drug safety between COD and "canakinumab fixed frequency" (CFF) policies. This retrospective study collected data from three Israeli paediatric rheumatology centres, of children with crFMF who were treated with canakinumab. Epidemiological and clinical parameters, cumulative drug dosages, and adverse events were compared between children treated by both policies. Twenty-five (49 %) children were treated according to COD policy and 26 according to CFF policy. Demographic parameters and most of the disease features did not differ significantly between the groups. Both groups showed significant reduction in attacks after canakinumab introduction. The median number (interquartile range) of attacks per month did not differ significantly between the COD and CFF groups (0.33 (0.08, 0.58) and 0.13 (0, 0.5), respectively, p = 0.485 (even though, per definition, COD patients presumably had an attack before receiving the second canakinumab dose). The mean monthly dose was lower for the COD than the CFF group (1.13 ± 1.13 vs. 3.16 ± 1.46 mg/kg, p < 0.001). Adverse events were similar between the groups. For individuals with crFMF, COD compared to CFF policy can achieve similar efficacy and safety, with a lower accumulated canakinumab dose, rendering it less immunosuppressive and less expensive.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38569431
pii: S1567-5769(24)00485-5
doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2024.111967
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
111967Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.