Plain computed tomography for differentiating neoplastic and non-neoplastic pedunculated gallbladder polyps.

cholesterol polyp gallbladder carcinoma neoplastic polyp pedunculated gallbladder polyps plain computed tomography

Journal

Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)
ISSN: 1349-7235
Titre abrégé: Intern Med
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 9204241

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Apr 2024
Historique:
medline: 4 4 2024
pubmed: 4 4 2024
entrez: 3 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Surgery is recommended for large pedunculated gallbladder polyps (PGPs), which measure 10 mm or more in size, because they tend to be neoplastic polyps (NPs), such as adenomas and adenocarcinomas. However, after resection, they are often found to be non-neoplastic polyps (non-NPs). This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of plain CT in distinguishing NPs from non-NPs. Of the 80 patients who underwent cholecystectomy for PGPs ( 10 mm between January 2008 and February 2021, 46 who underwent plain and contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT) before resection were included in this study. We retrospectively assessed the polyp detection rate (PDR) using CT and calculated the difference in the CT values between PGPs and the surrounding bile. Twenty-one patients had NPs (12 adenomas, 5 carcinomas in adenoma, and 4 adenocarcinomas). The others were non-NPs (24 cholesterol polyps and one hyperplastic polyp). The PDR using plain CT was significantly higher in the NP group than in the non-NP group (38% (8/21) vs. 0% (0/25), p <0.01). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of NPs were 38%, 100%, 100%, 66%, and 72%, respectively. The difference in the CT values between PGPs and the surrounding bile was significantly larger in the NP group than in the non-NP group (14.12 ± 11.38 HU, 5.04 ± 6.15 HU, p <0.01). PGPs detected using plain CT had a high probability of being NPs. Plain CT is therefore considered to be useful for differentiating NPs from non-NPs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38569912
doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.2760-23
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Fumisato Kozakai (F)

Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Japan.

Takahisa Ogawa (T)

Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Japan.

Toshitaka Sakai (T)

Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Japan.

Shinsuke Koshita (S)

Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Japan.

Yoshihide Kanno (Y)

Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Japan.

Hiroaki Kusunose (H)

Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Japan.

Keisuke Yonamine (K)

Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Japan.

Kazuaki Miyamoto (K)

Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Japan.

Haruka Okano (H)

Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Japan.

Yuto Matsuoka (Y)

Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Japan.

Kento Hosokawa (K)

Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Japan.

Hidehito Sumiya (H)

Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Japan.

Reiji Sugita (R)

Department of Radiology, Sendai City Medical Center, Japan.

Kei Ito (K)

Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Japan.

Classifications MeSH