Comparison of revision rates and epidemiological data of a single total knee arthroplasty system of different designs (cruciate retaining, posterior stabilized, mobile bearing, and fixed bearing): a meta-analysis and systematic review of clinical trials and national arthroplasty registries.
Attune knee system
Cruciate retaining
Fixed bearing
Mobile bearing
Posterior stabilized
Total knee arthroplasty
Journal
Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
ISSN: 1434-3916
Titre abrégé: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9011043
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Apr 2024
03 Apr 2024
Historique:
received:
29
11
2023
accepted:
10
03
2024
medline:
4
4
2024
pubmed:
4
4
2024
entrez:
3
4
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
This study aimed to meta-analyze epidemiological data, revision rates, and incidences of different designs of a single Total Knee Arthroplasty System and compare these factors across different countries. A systematic review was conducted on clinical studies and arthroplasty registries of ATTUNE TKA from 1999 to 2020. The main endpoints analyzed were revision rates and epidemiological data. The average age of patients was 67.8 years, with a gender distribution of 60% female and 40% male. The pooled average BMI was 29.4 kg/m In conclusion, pooled data from 41,200 cases of TKA with a single Total Knee Arthroplasty System in two arthroplasty registries revealed that there was no significant difference in revision rates between the mobile bearing and fixed bearing design within the first 5 years after implantation. In addition, a comparison of the revision rates in n = 123,361 cases showed no significant advantage for cruciate retaining or posterior stabilized in the first 5 years after implantation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to meta-analyze epidemiological data, revision rates, and incidences of different designs of a single Total Knee Arthroplasty System and compare these factors across different countries.
METHODS
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted on clinical studies and arthroplasty registries of ATTUNE TKA from 1999 to 2020. The main endpoints analyzed were revision rates and epidemiological data.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The average age of patients was 67.8 years, with a gender distribution of 60% female and 40% male. The pooled average BMI was 29.4 kg/m
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, pooled data from 41,200 cases of TKA with a single Total Knee Arthroplasty System in two arthroplasty registries revealed that there was no significant difference in revision rates between the mobile bearing and fixed bearing design within the first 5 years after implantation. In addition, a comparison of the revision rates in n = 123,361 cases showed no significant advantage for cruciate retaining or posterior stabilized in the first 5 years after implantation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38570357
doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05286-6
pii: 10.1007/s00402-024-05286-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Niethard FU, Biberthaler P, Pfeil J (2017) Duale Reihe-Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie. 9. Auflage. Niethard F, Pfeil J, Biberthaler P, editors. Vol. 670. Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Hitzl W, Heisinger S, Hobusch GM, Frank K, Cotofana S (2019) Projected numbers of primary total knee replacement in Austria from 2015–2075. Orthopade 48(2):144–149
doi: 10.1007/s00132-018-3605-9
pubmed: 30051278
Hantouly AT, Ahmed AF, Alzobi O, Toubasi A, Salameh M, Elmhiregh A et al (2022) Mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 32(3):481
doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-02999-x
pubmed: 34021791
Hao D, Wang J (2021) Fixed-bearing vs mobile-bearing prostheses for total knee arthroplasty after approximately 10 years of follow-up: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 16(1):437
doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02560-w
pubmed: 34229702
pmcid: 8259014
Migliorini F, Maffulli N, Cuozzo F, Pilone M, Elsner K, Eschweiler J (2022) No difference between mobile and fixed bearing in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30(9):3138
doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07065-5
pubmed: 35861866
pmcid: 9418337
Ruckenstuhl P, Revelant F, Hauer G, Bernhardt GA, Leitner L, Gruber G et al (2022) No difference in clinical outcome, pain, and range of motion between fixed and mobile bearing Attune total knee arthroplasty: a prospective single-center trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 23(1):413
doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05382-x
pubmed: 35501786
pmcid: 9063062
Capella M, Dolfin M, Saccia F (2016) Mobile bearing and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty. Ann Transl Med 4(7):127
doi: 10.21037/atm.2015.12.64
pubmed: 27162777
pmcid: 4842394
Zhang W, Wang J, Li H, Wang W, George DM, Huang T (2020) Fixed- versus mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep 10(1):19075
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76124-z
pubmed: 33154502
pmcid: 7645610
Watanabe T, Tomita T, Fujii M, Hashimoto J, Sugamoto K, Yoshikawa H (2005) Comparison between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing knees in bilateral total knee replacements. Int Orthop Internet. 29(3):179–181
doi: 10.1007/s00264-005-0646-6
Cheng M, Chen D, Guo Y, Zhu C, Zhang X (2013) Comparison of fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty with a mean five-year follow-up: a meta-analysis. Exp Ther Med 6(1):45
doi: 10.3892/etm.2013.1122
pubmed: 23935716
pmcid: 3735548
[OCEBM levels of evidence system]-PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24564030/ . Accessed 15 Apr 2023
NORE Network of Orthopaedic Registries of Europe. https://www.efort.org/about-us/nore/ . Accessed 28 May 2023
Wittig U, Moshammer M, Vielgut I, Hauer G, Reinbacher P, Leithner A et al (2022) Higher use of fixed-bearing over mobile-bearing and posterior-stabilized over medial pivot designs in total knee arthroplasty (TKA): a systematic comparative analysis using worldwide arthroplasty registers from England and Wales, Australia, Norway, New Zealand, Germany and Switzerland. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143(2):1021–1029
doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04410-8
pubmed: 35303145
pmcid: 9925559
Sadoghi P, Schröder C, Fottner A, Steinbrück A, Betz O, Müller PE et al (2012) Application and survival curve of total hip arthroplasties: a systematic comparative analysis using worldwide hip arthroplasty registers. Int Orthop 36(11):2197–2203
doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1614-6
pubmed: 22911152
pmcid: 3479284
Sadoghi P, Janda W, Agreiter M, Rauf R, Leithner A, Labek G (2013) Pooled outcome of total hip arthroplasty with the CementLess Spotorno (CLS) system: a comparative analysis of clinical studies and worldwide arthroplasty register data. Int Orthop 37(6):995
doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1867-8
pubmed: 23525550
pmcid: 3664163
Pabinger C, Bridgens A, Berghold A, Wurzer P, Boehler N, Labek G (2015) Quality of outcome data in total hip arthroplasty: comparison of registry data and worldwide non-registry studies from 5 decades. Hip Int 25(5):394–401
doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000239
pubmed: 25837781
Hauer G, Vielgut I, Amerstorfer F, Maurer-Ertl W, Leithner A, Sadoghi P (2018) Survival rate of short-stem hip prostheses: a comparative analysis of clinical studies and national arthroplasty registers. J Arthroplasty 33(6):1800–1805
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.01.017
pubmed: 29428465
Kaptein BL, den Hollander P, Thomassen B, Fiocco M, Nelissen RGHH (2020) A randomized controlled trial comparing tibial migration of the ATTUNE cemented cruciate-retaining knee prosthesis with the PFC-sigma design. Bone Jt J 102-B(9):1158–1166
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B9.BJJ-2020-0096.R1
Moorthy V, Lai MC, Liow MHL, Chen JY, Pang HN, Chia SL et al (2021) Similar postoperative outcomes after total knee arthroplasty with measured resection and gap balancing techniques using a contemporary knee system: a randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29(10):3178–3185
doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06103-4
pubmed: 32556437
Ruckenstuhl P, Revelant F, Hauer G, Bernhardt GA, Leitner L, Gruber G et al (2022) No difference in clinical outcome, pain, and range of motion between fixed and mobile bearing Attune total knee arthroplasty: a prospective single-center trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 23(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05382-x
doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05382-x
Torino D, Damsgaard C, Kolessar DJ, Hayes DS, Foster B, Constantino J et al (2022) Tibial baseplate-cement interface debonding in the ATTUNE total knee arthroplasty system. Arthroplast Today 17:165–171
doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.06.012
pubmed: 36164312
pmcid: 9508148
Maniar RN, Bhatnagar N, Bidwai R, Dhiman A, Chanda D, Sanghavi N (2022) Comparison of patellofemoral outcomes between attune and PFC sigma designs: a prospective matched-pair analysis. Clin Orthop Surg 14(1):96–104
doi: 10.4055/cios20130
pubmed: 35251546
Vanitcharoenkul E, Unnanuntana A (2021) Midterm functional recovery of Total knee arthroplasty patients compared between the ATTUNE knee system and the press fit condylar (PFC) SIGMA knee system. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22(1):620
doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04464-6
pubmed: 34256770
pmcid: 8278715
Giaretta S, Berti M, Micheloni GM, Ceccato A, Marangoni F, Momoli A (2019) Early experience with the ATTUNE total knee replacement system. Acta Biomed 4(90):98–103
Ashraf Y, Iqbal HJ, Senevirathana S, Ashraf T (2020) Has the modern design of Attune total knee replacement improved outcome in patients with isolated patellofemoral arthritis? J Orthop Surg 28(3):230949902097555
doi: 10.1177/2309499020975553
Pabinger C, Berghold A, Boehler N, Labek G (2013) Revision rates after knee replacement. Cumulative results from worldwide clinical studies versus joint registers. Osteoarthr Cartil 21(2):263–268
doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.11.014
Ranstam J, Kärrholm J, Pulkkinen P, Mäkelä K, Espehaug B, Pedersen AB et al (2011) Statistical analysis of arthroplasty data: II. Guidelines. Acta Orthop. 82(3):258
doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.588863
pubmed: 21619500
pmcid: 3235302
Hauer G, Bernhardt GA, Hohenberger G, Leitner L, Ruckenstuhl P, Leithner A et al (2020) Similar revision rates in clinical studies and arthroplasty registers and no bias for developer publications in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 140(4):537–544
doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03336-3
pubmed: 32036418
pmcid: 7109167
Labek G, Thaler M, Janda W, Agreiter M, Stöckl B (2011) Revision rates after total joint replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Br Vol 93 B(3):293–297. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.93B3.25467
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B3.25467
Mehta SP, Perruccio AV, Palaganas M, Davis AM (2015) Do women have poorer outcomes following total knee replacement? Osteoarthr Cartil 23(9):1476–1482
doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.05.007
Jorn LP, Johnsson R, Toksvig-Larsen S (1999) Patient satisfaction, function and return to work after knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 70(4):343–347
doi: 10.3109/17453679908997822
pubmed: 10569263
Wittig U, Moshammer M, Vielgut I, Hauer G, Reinbacher P, Leithner A, et al (2022) Higher use of fixed-bearing over mobile-bearing and posterior-stabilized over medial pivot designs in total knee arthroplasty (TKA): a systematic comparative analysis using worldwide arthroplasty registers from England and Wales, Australia, Norway, New Zealand, Germany and Switzerland. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
Ming HZ, Lin OG, Bo XL (2011) Rotating-platform knee arthroplasty: a review and update. Orthop Surg 3(4):224
doi: 10.1111/j.1757-7861.2011.00156.x
Wasielewski RC, Komistek RD, Zingde SM, Sheridan KC, Mahfouz MR (2008) Lack of axial rotation in mobile-bearing knee designs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(11):2662
doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0354-9
pubmed: 18581194
pmcid: 2565026
Woolson ST, Northrop GD (2004) Mobile- vs. fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a clinical and radiologic study. J Arthroplasty 19(2):135–140
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2003.10.004
pubmed: 14973854
Baktir A, Karaaslan F, Yurdakul E, Karaoglu S (2016) Mobile-versus fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial featuring 6–10-year follow-up. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 50(1):1–9
pubmed: 26854042
Lädermann A, Lübbeke A, Stern R, Riand N, Fritschy D (2008) Fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised, clinical and radiological study with mid-term results at 7 years. Knee 15(3):206–210
doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2008.01.010
pubmed: 18329883
Migliorini F, Eschweiler J, Tingart M, Rath B (2019) Posterior-stabilized versus cruciate-retained implants for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 29(4):937–946
doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02370-1
pubmed: 30649620
Huang CH, Liau JJ, Cheng CK (2007) Fixed or mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res 2(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-2-1
doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-2-1
pubmed: 17204165
pmcid: 1784078
Migliorini F, Eschweiler J, Tingart M, Rath B (2019) Posterior-stabilized versus cruciate-retained implants for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 29(4):937–946
doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02370-1
pubmed: 30649620
Song SJ, Park CH, Bae DK (2019) What to know for selecting cruciate-retaining or posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg 11(2):142–150
doi: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.2.142
pubmed: 31156764
pmcid: 6526126
Li N, Tan Y, Deng Y, Chen L (2014) Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(3):556–564
doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2275-0
pubmed: 23117166
Song SJ, Park CH, Bae DK (2019) What to know for selecting cruciate-retaining or posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg. 11(2):142–150
doi: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.2.142
pubmed: 31156764
pmcid: 6526126
Li N, Tan Y, Deng Y, Chen L (2014) Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 22(3):556–564
doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2275-0
pubmed: 23117166
Kanna R, Murali SM, Ramanathan AT, Pereira L, Yadav CS, Anand S (2023) Cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty has a better 10 year survival than posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Exp Orthop 10(1):19
doi: 10.1186/s40634-023-00583-2
pubmed: 36800047
pmcid: 9938095