Characterizing personal recovery in severe mental illness: French psychometric validation of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR-Fr).


Journal

Psychiatric rehabilitation journal
ISSN: 1559-3126
Titre abrégé: Psychiatr Rehabil J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9601800

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Apr 2024
Historique:
medline: 4 4 2024
pubmed: 4 4 2024
entrez: 4 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The support of the personal recovery of people with lived experience of mental illness is a major issue in clinical practice. Thus, a valid instrument to assess personal recovery is needed. The present study aimed to validate the French translation of the 22-item Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR-Fr). A convenience sample of 222 participants reporting a severe mental illness diagnosis was recruited online. Psychometric properties of the QPR-Fr were evaluated. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted for structural validity. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed. To test for convergent validity, we conducted multiple linear regression analysis to explore the QPR-Fr associations with psychological distress and the CHIME framework (with Connectedness, Hope and optimism about the future, Identity, Meaning in life, and Empowerment) proxy measures (perceived social support, hope, self-esteem, quality of life, and empowerment). An adequate fit was found for a 19-item unidimensional factor structure. Internal consistency was excellent. Test reliability was good. The QPR-Fr total score was significantly positively associated with quality of life, hope, self-esteem, and social support satisfaction and negatively associated with psychological distress. No significant association was found with social support availability nor with empowerment. This study provides additional data to support the cross-cultural validity of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery. The QPR-Fr is a valid and reliable tool to assess personal recovery. Practitioners could use the QPR-Fr to assess personal recovery in collaboration with people with lived experience. Convergent validity with CHIME proxy measures supports the validity of the CHIME framework in a French cultural context. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Identifiants

pubmed: 38573671
pii: 2024-70722-001
doi: 10.1037/prj0000601
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Caroline Munuera (C)

Laboratoire de Psychologie, Universite de Bordeaux, UR4139 (Unite de Recherche).

Simon Felix (S)

Laboratoire de Psychologie, Universite de Bordeaux, UR4139 (Unite de Recherche).

Antoinette Prouteau (A)

Laboratoire de Psychologie, Universite de Bordeaux, UR4139 (Unite de Recherche).

Meryl Caiada (M)

Laboratoire de Psychologie, Universite de Bordeaux, UR4139 (Unite de Recherche).

Sarah Guionnet (S)

Laboratoire de Psychologie, Universite de Bordeaux, UR4139 (Unite de Recherche).

Kévin-Marc Valéry (KM)

Laboratoire de Psychologie, Universite de Bordeaux, UR4139 (Unite de Recherche).

Yoann Fombouchet (Y)

Laboratoire de Psychologie, Universite de Bordeaux, UR4139 (Unite de Recherche).

Sébastien Gard (S)

Reseau des Centres Expert des Troubles Bipolaires, Fondation FondaMental.

François Chevrier (F)

Centre Ressource Bipolaire Sud Aquitain, Clinique Chateau Caradoc.

Isabelle Minois (I)

Reseau des Centres Expert des Troubles Bipolaires, Fondation FondaMental.

Katia M'bailara (K)

Laboratoire de Psychologie, Universite de Bordeaux, UR4139 (Unite de Recherche).

Classifications MeSH