Evaluation of ELISA in raw milk for detection of antibodies to Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in dairy herd.


Journal

Veterinaria italiana
ISSN: 1828-1427
Titre abrégé: Vet Ital
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 0201543

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
31 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 02 08 2022
accepted: 27 10 2023
medline: 5 4 2024
pubmed: 5 4 2024
entrez: 5 4 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Paratuberculosis (PTBC) is a chronic intestinal disease of animals caused by Mycobacterium avium paratuberculosis (MAP). MAP infection is diagnosed through indirect tests based on the immune response. The aims of this study were to compare the performance of two milk ELISA for the diagnosis of PTBC and to assess the bulk tank milk (BTM) MAP exposure in dairy cattle in Argentina. A total of 357 fecal, serum, and milk samples were collected. The fecal samples were processed by culture for MAP isolation, while both, serum and milk samples were used for the detection of antibodies by two different ELISA tests, "in-house" and commercial kit. MAP was isolated in 3.9% of fecal samples. For milk ELISA, poor concordances were obtained. Optimized cut-off points were calculated. The highest sensitivity and specificity values (64% and 80% respectively) were obtained with the combination of MAP isolation and commercial milk ELISA. The results indicate that the combination of different techniques to identify of dairy cattle infected with MAP increases the efficiency of diagnosis. In addition, BTM  samples (n=98) were evaluated to determine herd status using the commercial kit during two seasons, identifying 33.3% of positive samples in autumn and 35.4% in spring.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38577845
doi: 10.12834/VetIt.2948.18971.1
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Silvina Tieri (S)

Laboratorio de Bacteriología, Departamento de Producción Animal, EEA INTA, Balcarce, Buenos Aires, Argentina; CONICET. Buenos Aires, Argentina; Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Balcarce, Buenos Aires, Argentina. silvinatieri@hotmail.com.

Karina Cirone (K)

Laboratorio de Bacteriología, Departamento de Producción Animal, EEA INTA, Balcarce, Buenos Aires, Argentina; CONICET. Buenos Aires, Argentina; Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Balcarce, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Claudia Morsella (C)

Laboratorio de Bacteriología, Departamento de Producción Animal, EEA INTA, Balcarce, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Laura Méndez (L)

Laboratorio de Bacteriología, Departamento de Producción Animal, EEA INTA, Balcarce, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Silvia Mundo (S)

CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones en Producción Animal (INPA). Av. Chorroarín 280, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, C1427CWO, Argentina; Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Cátedra de Inmunología, Chorroarín 280, C1427CWO, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Bárbara Fernández (B)

CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones en Producción Animal (INPA). Av. Chorroarín 280, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, C1427CWO, Argentina; Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Cátedra de Inmunología, Chorroarín 280, C1427CWO, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Fernando Paolicchi (F)

Laboratorio de Bacteriología, Departamento de Producción Animal, EEA INTA, Balcarce, Buenos Aires, Argentina; CONICET. Buenos Aires, Argentina; Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Balcarce, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Classifications MeSH