Treatment response as surrogate to predict risk for disease progression in pediatric medulloblastoma with persistent MRI lesions after first-line treatment.

MRI children medulloblastoma persistent residual disease

Journal

Neuro-oncology
ISSN: 1523-5866
Titre abrégé: Neuro Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100887420

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 23 11 2023
medline: 5 4 2024
pubmed: 5 4 2024
entrez: 5 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

This study aims at clarifying the impact of persistent residual lesions following first-line treatment for pediatric medulloblastoma. Data on 84 pediatric patients with medulloblastoma and persistent residual lesions on centrally reviewed MRI at the end of first-line therapy were analyzed. Twenty patients (23.8%) had residual lesions in the tumor bed (R+/M0), 51 (60.7%) had distant lesions (R0/M+) and 13 (15.5%) had both (R+/M+). Overall response to first-line therapy was minor or partial (≥25% reduction, MR/PR) for 64 (76.2%) and stable disease (SD) for 20 patients (23.8%). Five-year post-primary-treatment progression-free (pptPFS) and overall survival (pptOS) were superior after MR/PR (pptPFS: 62.5±7.0%[MR/PR] vs. 35.9±12.8%[SD], p=0.03; pptOS: 79.7±5.9[MR/PR] vs. 55.5±13.9[SD], p=0.04). Further, R+/M+ was associated with a higher risk for progression (5-year pptPFS: 22.9±17.9%[R+,M+] vs. 72.4±12.0%[R+,M0]; p=0.03). Watch-and-wait was pursued in 58 patients, while n=26 received additional treatments (chemotherapy only, n=19; surgery only, n=2; combined, n=3; valproic acid, n=2), and their outcomes were not superior to watch-and-wait (5-year pptPFS: 58.5±7.7% vs. 51.6±10.7% p=0.71; 5-year pptOS: 76.3±6.9% vs. 69.8±9.7%, p=0.74). For the whole cohort, five-year pptPFS by molecular subgroup (58 cases) were WNT: 100%, SHH: 50.0±35.4%, Group-4, 52.5±10.5, Group-3 54.2±13.8%; (p=0.08). Overall response and extent of lesions can function as surrogate parameters to predict outcomes in pediatric MB patients with persistent lesions after first-line therapy. Especially in case of solitary persistent medulloblastoma MRI lesion, additional therapy was not beneficial. Therefore, treatment response, extent/kind of residual lesions and further diagnostic information needs consideration for indication of additional treatments for persisting lesions.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
This study aims at clarifying the impact of persistent residual lesions following first-line treatment for pediatric medulloblastoma.
METHODS METHODS
Data on 84 pediatric patients with medulloblastoma and persistent residual lesions on centrally reviewed MRI at the end of first-line therapy were analyzed.
RESULTS RESULTS
Twenty patients (23.8%) had residual lesions in the tumor bed (R+/M0), 51 (60.7%) had distant lesions (R0/M+) and 13 (15.5%) had both (R+/M+). Overall response to first-line therapy was minor or partial (≥25% reduction, MR/PR) for 64 (76.2%) and stable disease (SD) for 20 patients (23.8%). Five-year post-primary-treatment progression-free (pptPFS) and overall survival (pptOS) were superior after MR/PR (pptPFS: 62.5±7.0%[MR/PR] vs. 35.9±12.8%[SD], p=0.03; pptOS: 79.7±5.9[MR/PR] vs. 55.5±13.9[SD], p=0.04). Further, R+/M+ was associated with a higher risk for progression (5-year pptPFS: 22.9±17.9%[R+,M+] vs. 72.4±12.0%[R+,M0]; p=0.03). Watch-and-wait was pursued in 58 patients, while n=26 received additional treatments (chemotherapy only, n=19; surgery only, n=2; combined, n=3; valproic acid, n=2), and their outcomes were not superior to watch-and-wait (5-year pptPFS: 58.5±7.7% vs. 51.6±10.7% p=0.71; 5-year pptOS: 76.3±6.9% vs. 69.8±9.7%, p=0.74). For the whole cohort, five-year pptPFS by molecular subgroup (58 cases) were WNT: 100%, SHH: 50.0±35.4%, Group-4, 52.5±10.5, Group-3 54.2±13.8%; (p=0.08).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Overall response and extent of lesions can function as surrogate parameters to predict outcomes in pediatric MB patients with persistent lesions after first-line therapy. Especially in case of solitary persistent medulloblastoma MRI lesion, additional therapy was not beneficial. Therefore, treatment response, extent/kind of residual lesions and further diagnostic information needs consideration for indication of additional treatments for persisting lesions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38578306
pii: 7641402
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noae071
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Denise Obrecht-Sturm (D)

Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Lena Schömig (L)

Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Martin Mynarek (M)

Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Mildred Scheel Cancer Career Center HaTriCS4, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Brigitte Bison (B)

Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.

Rudolf Schwarz (R)

Department for Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Torsten Pietsch (T)

Institute of Neuropathology, Brain Tumor Reference Center of the German Society for Neuropathology and Neuroanatomy (DGNN), University of Bonn, DZNE German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Bonn, Germany.

Stefan M Pfister (SM)

Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Martin Sill (M)

Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Dominik Sturm (D)

Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Pediatric Glioma Research Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.

Felix Sahm (F)

Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of Neuropathology, University Heidelberg Heidelberg, Germany.
CCU Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Rolf-Dieter Kortmann (RD)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Nicolas U Gerber (NU)

Department of Pediatric Oncology, University Children's Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

André O von Bueren (AO)

Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Gudrun Fleischhack (G)

Pediatrics III, Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

Ulrich Schüller (U)

Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Neuropathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Research Institute Kinderkrebs-Zentrum Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Gunther Nussbaumer (G)

Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Martin Benesch (M)

Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Stefan Rutkowski (S)

Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Classifications MeSH