Enhancing inferences and conclusions in body image focused non-experimental research via a causal modelling approach: A tutorial.

Causal diagram Causal inference Non-experimental data Target trial

Journal

Body image
ISSN: 1873-6807
Titre abrégé: Body Image
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101222431

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 20 09 2023
revised: 29 02 2024
accepted: 06 03 2024
medline: 6 4 2024
pubmed: 6 4 2024
entrez: 5 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Causal inference is often the goal of psychological research. However, most researchers refrain from drawing causal conclusions based on non-experimental evidence. Despite the challenges associated with producing causal evidence from non-experimental data, it is crucial to address causal questions directly rather than avoiding them. Here we provide a clear, non-technical overview of the fundamental concepts (including the counterfactual framework and related assumptions) and tools that permit causal inference in non-experimental data, intended as a starting point for readers unfamiliar with the literature. Certain tools, such as the target trial framework and causal diagrams, have been developed to assist with the identification and reduction of potential biases in study design and analysis and the interpretation of findings. We apply these concepts and tools to a motivating example from the body image field. We assert that more precise and detailed elucidation of the barriers to causal inference within one's study is arguably a key first step in the enhancement of non-experimental research and future intervention development and evaluation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38579514
pii: S1740-1445(24)00026-3
doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2024.101704
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101704

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest None.

Auteurs

Stephanie R Aarsman (SR)

Deakin University, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, SEED Lifespan Strategic Research Centre for the Developmental Origins of Health and Wellbeing, Geelong, Australia; Centre for Adolescent Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. Electronic address: stephanie.aarsman@deakin.edu.au.

Christopher J Greenwood (CJ)

Deakin University, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, SEED Lifespan Strategic Research Centre for the Developmental Origins of Health and Wellbeing, Geelong, Australia; Centre for Adolescent Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; University of Melbourne, Department of Paediatrics, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

Jake Linardon (J)

Deakin University, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, SEED Lifespan Strategic Research Centre for the Developmental Origins of Health and Wellbeing, Geelong, Australia.

Rachel F Rodgers (RF)

APPEAR, Department of Applied Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, USA; Department of Psychiatric Emergency & Acute Care, Lapeyronie Hospital, CHRU Montpellier, France.

Mariel Messer (M)

Deakin University, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, SEED Lifespan Strategic Research Centre for the Developmental Origins of Health and Wellbeing, Geelong, Australia.

Hannah K Jarman (HK)

Deakin University, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, SEED Lifespan Strategic Research Centre for the Developmental Origins of Health and Wellbeing, Geelong, Australia.

Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz (M)

Deakin University, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, SEED Lifespan Strategic Research Centre for the Developmental Origins of Health and Wellbeing, Geelong, Australia.

Classifications MeSH