Fluoroscopy-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound neurotomy of the lumbar zygapophyseal joints: a prospective, open-label study.

Back Pain Pain Management Pain Measurement TECHNOLOGY Treatment Outcome

Journal

Regional anesthesia and pain medicine
ISSN: 1532-8651
Titre abrégé: Reg Anesth Pain Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9804508

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 26 01 2024
accepted: 22 03 2024
medline: 6 4 2024
pubmed: 6 4 2024
entrez: 5 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The objective of this study is to investigate safety and effectiveness of a fluoroscopy-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) system for thermal ablation of the lumbar medial branch nerves. This dual center prospective cohort study enrolled 30 participants with lumbar zygapophyseal joint syndrome. Each participant previously had a positive response to either a single diagnostic analgesic block or radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The primary effectiveness outcome was individual responder rate, defined as a reduction of two points or more on the pain intensity numerical rating scale without an increase in opioid intake, or a reduction in opioid intake without an increase in pain at 6 months after the intervention. The primary safety outcome was procedure-related or device-related adverse events (AEs). Secondary outcome variables included MRI evidence of tissue ablation, Oswestry Disability Index, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey, Brief Pain Inventory, and Patient Global Impression of Change. The individual responder rate was 89.7% at 2 days, 89.7% at 7 days, 72.4% at 14 days, 82.1% at 30 days, 59.3% at 90 days and 82.6% at 180 days. The average Numeric Rating Scale for pain severity decreased from 7.1 at baseline to 3.0 (N=29) after 2 days, 3.0 (N=29) after 7 days, 3.1 (N=29) after 14 days, 3.2 (N=28) after 30 days, 4.3 (N=27) after 90 days, and 3.3 (N=23) after 180 days. All participants tolerated the procedure well with no significant side effects or complications. Fluoroscopy-guided HIFU neurotomy achieved clinical responses comparable with RFA, and there were no significant device-related or procedure-related AEs. NCT04129034.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38580339
pii: rapm-2024-105345
doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105345
pii:
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04129034']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© American Society of Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: AH and RA are the founders of FUSMobile. MG is the chief medical officer of FUSMobile and holds an option to buy ordinary shares. EM and BS are employees of FUSMobile and hold an option to buy ordinary shares. EM and SL hold shares and ordinary options in FUSMobile.

Auteurs

Michael Gofeld (M)

Unika Medical Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada mikegofeld@gmail.com.

Kevin J Smith (KJ)

Unika Medical Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Anuj Bhatia (A)

Anesthesia and Pain Management, University of Toronto and University Health Network - Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Vladimir Djuric (V)

McMaster University Medical Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Suzanne Leblang (S)

Focused Ultrasound Foundation, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.

Niv Rebhun (N)

FUSMobile, Alpharetta, Georgia, USA.

Ron Aginsky (R)

FUSMobile LTD, Haifa, Israel.

Eric Miller (E)

FUSMobile, Alpharetta, Georgia, USA.

Brian Skoglind (B)

FUSMobile, Alpharetta, Georgia, USA.

Arik Hananel (A)

FUSMobile, Alpharetta, Georgia, USA.

Classifications MeSH