Outcome of right ventricular microaxial pump support in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 12 06 2023
accepted: 01 04 2024
medline: 6 4 2024
pubmed: 6 4 2024
entrez: 5 4 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Right ventricular failure (RVF) after cardiac surgery is associated with an in-hospital mortality rate of up to 75%. Microaxial flow pumps are one of the mechanical circulatory supports (MCS) options available for the treatment of RVF, however the specifics of timing and indication for MCS, as well as predictors for survival, remain unclear due to a dearth of published data. We evaluated the clinical outcome of patients treated with Impella-RP for predictors of mortality and the hemodynamic effects of the pump. This is a single-center retrospective observational study involving adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass between January 2019 and December 2020 in cardiac surgery and required therapeutic management of RVF with an Impella-RP. Overall, 18 patients were included and analyzed for factors that could be associated with mortality, or that could be predictors of patient outcomes for this population. Treatment of RVF with Impella-RP improved the patient hemodynamics significantly and had a survival rate of 61% within 30 days. Patients with isolated CABG or better liver function before implantation had a better survival rate, which may indicate that underlying disease and timing of implantation are significant for successful treatment of RVF.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38580761
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58602-w
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-58602-w
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

8078

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Anderson, M. et al. Outcomes of patients with right ventricular failure requiring short-term hemodynamic support with the Impella RP device. J. Heart Lung Transplant Off. Publ. Int. Soc. Heart Transpl. 37, 1448–1458 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2018.08.001
Shekiladze, N. et al. A single healthcare experience with Impella RP. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 97, E161–E167 (2021).
doi: 10.1002/ccd.28986 pubmed: 32569445
Arrigo, M. et al. Right ventricular failure: Pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. Card. Fail. Rev. 5, 140–146 (2019).
doi: 10.15420/cfr.2019.15.2 pubmed: 31768270 pmcid: 6848943
Kormos, R. L. et al. Right ventricular failure in patients with the HeartMate II continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: Incidence, risk factors, and effect on outcomes. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 139, 1316–1324 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.11.020 pubmed: 20132950
Anderson, M. B. et al. Benefits of a novel percutaneous ventricular assist device for right heart failure: The prospective RECOVER RIGHT study of the Impella RP device. J. Heart Lung Transpl. Off. Publ. Int. Soc. Heart Transpl. 34, 1549–1560 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2015.08.018
Anderson, M. et al. Impella rp post approval study: First multi-center, prospective post market approval results for the Impella RP in patients with right ventricular failure. J. Heart Lung Transpl. 36, S64 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2017.01.158
Botti, G. et al. Impella RP for patients with acute right ventricular failure and cardiogenic shock: A subanalysis from the IMP-IT registry. J. Pers. Med. 12, 1481 (2022).
doi: 10.3390/jpm12091481 pubmed: 36143266 pmcid: 9506315
Qureshi, A. M. et al. Percutaneous Impella RP use for refractory right heart failure in adolescents and young adults-A multicenter U.S. experience. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. Off. J. Soc. Card. Angiogr. Interv. 96, 376–381 (2020).
doi: 10.1002/ccd.28830
Haddad, F., Couture, P., Tousignant, C. & Denault, A. Y. The right ventricle in cardiac surgery, a perioperative perspective: II. Pathophysiology, clinical importance, and management. Anesth. Analg. 108, 422–433 (2009).
doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818d8b92 pubmed: 19151265
Rahi, W. et al. Noninvasive prediction of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure in patients with normal LV EF: Comparison of CMR with comprehensive echocardiography. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. Off. Publ. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. S0894–7317(24), 00058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2024.02.001 (2024).
doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2024.02.001
Kawasaki, M. Noninvasive measurement of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure by speckle tracking echocardiography. In Echocardiography in Heart Failure and Cardiac Electrophysiology (ed. De, T.) (IntechOpen Publishing, UK, 2016).
Apostolakis, S. & Konstantinides, S. The right ventricle in health and disease: insights into physiology, pathophysiology and diagnostic management. Cardiology 121, 263–273 (2012).
doi: 10.1159/000338705 pubmed: 22626882
Mehta, S. R. et al. Impact of right ventricular involvement on mortality and morbidity in patients with inferior myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 37, 37–43 (2001).
doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)01089-5 pubmed: 11153770
Basir, M. B. et al. Effect of early initiation of mechanical circulatory support on survival in cardiogenic shock. Am. J. Cardiol. 119, 845–851 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.11.037 pubmed: 28040188
Helgestad, O. K. L. et al. Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock. Open Heart 7, e001214 (2020).
doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001214 pubmed: 32201591 pmcid: 7059524
Bhama, J. K. et al. Clinical experience with temporary right ventricular mechanical circulatory support. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 156, 1885–1891 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.04.094 pubmed: 29861112
Kapur, N. K. et al. Effects of a percutaneous mechanical circulatory support device for medically refractory right ventricular failure. J. Heart Lung Transplant Off. Publ. Int. Soc. Heart Transpl. 30, 1360–1367 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2011.07.005
Gramegna, M. et al. Impella RP support in refractory right ventricular failure complicating acute myocardial infarction with unsuccessful right coronary artery revascularization. Int. J. Cardiol. 302, 135–137 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.12.024 pubmed: 31866154
European Parliament. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). EUR-Lex Access to European Union Law (2016).

Auteurs

Medina Marta (M)

Department of Cardiovasular Surgery, University Hospital of Mainz, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.

Mahmoud Zada (M)

Department of Cardiology and Rhythmology, Hospital Mechernich, Mechernich, Germany.

Nils Theuerkauf (N)

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Georg Daniel Duerr (GD)

Department of Cardiovasular Surgery, University Hospital of Mainz, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.

Sebastian Zimmer (S)

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Hendrik Treede (H)

Department of Cardiovasular Surgery, University Hospital of Mainz, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.

Mehmet Oezkur (M)

Department of Cardiovasular Surgery, University Hospital of Mainz, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. m.oezkur@gmail.com.

Classifications MeSH