Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic ICG-fluorescence lymphatic-sparing palomo varicocelectomy: a comparative retrospective study of techniques and outcomes.

Children ICG Laparoscopy Lymphatics Robotics Varicocele

Journal

World journal of urology
ISSN: 1433-8726
Titre abrégé: World J Urol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8307716

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 04 01 2024
accepted: 26 02 2024
medline: 6 4 2024
pubmed: 6 4 2024
entrez: 6 4 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This study aimed to compare techniques and outcomes of robotic-assisted varicocelectomy (RAV) and laparoscopic varicocelectomy (LV). The medical records of 40 patients, who received RAV and LV over a 2-year period, were retrospectively analyzed. Palomo lymphatic-sparing varicocelectomy using ICG fluorescence was adopted in all cases. Three 5-mm trocars were placed in LV, whereas four ports, three 8-mm and one 5-mm, were placed in RAV. The spermatic vessels were ligated using clips in LV and ligatures in RAV. The two groups were compared regarding patient baseline and operative outcomes. All patients, with median age of 14 years (range 11-17), had left grade 3 varicocele according to Dubin-Amelar. All were symptomatic and 33/40 (82.5%) presented left testicular hypotrophy. All procedures were completed without conversion. The average operative time was significantly shorter in LV [20 min (range 11-30)] than in RAV [34.5 min (range 30-46)] (p = 0.001). No significant differences regarding analgesic requirement and hospitalization were observed (p = 0.55). At long-term follow-up (30 months), no complications occurred in both groups. The cosmetic outcome was significantly better in LV than RAV at 6-month and 12-month evaluations (p = 0.001). The total cost was significantly lower in LV (1.587,07 €) compared to RAV (5.650,31 €) (p = 0.001). RAV can be safely and effectively performed in pediatric patients, with the same excellent outcomes as conventional laparoscopic procedure. Laparoscopy has the advantages of faster surgery, smaller instruments, better cosmesis and lower cost than robotics. To date, laparoscopy remains preferable to robotics to treat pediatric varicocele.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38581596
doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04909-2
pii: 10.1007/s00345-024-04909-2
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

215

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Clarke BG (1966) Incidence of varicocele in normal men and among men of different ages. JAMA 198(10):1121–1122
doi: 10.1001/jama.1966.03110230137039 pubmed: 5953394
Kupis Ł, Dobroński PA, Radziszewski P (2015) Varicocele as a source of male infertility-current treatment techniques. Cent European J Urol 68:365–370. https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2015.642
doi: 10.5173/ceju.2015.642 pubmed: 26568883 pmcid: 4643713
Elahi M, Hojati V, Hashemitabar M, Afrough M, Kargar HM, Dastoorpoor M (2023) Negative effect of varicocele on sperm mitochondrial dysfunction: A cross-sectional study. Int J Reprod Biomed 21(4):323–332. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v21i4.13271
doi: 10.18502/ijrm.v21i4.13271 pubmed: 37260549 pmcid: 10227351
Kang C, Punjani N, Lee RK, Li PS, Goldstein M (2022) Effect of varicoceles on spermatogenesis. Semin Cell Dev Biol 121:114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2021.04.005
doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2021.04.005 pubmed: 33965333
Nakonechnyi Y, Nakonechnyi A, Fraczek M, Havrylyuk A, Kamieniczna M, Chopyak V, Kurpisz M (2022) Varicocelectomy improves sperm parameters, sperm DNA integrity as well as the other critical semen features. J Physiol Pharmacol 73(6). https://doi.org/10.26402/jpp.2022.6.09
Lay R, Logvinenko T, Kurtz MP, Masoom S, Venna A, Diamond DA (2023) Successful adolescent varicocelectomy improves total motile sperm count. J Pediatr Surg 58(12):2449–2452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.08.007
doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.08.007 pubmed: 37716841
Parrilli A, Roberti A, Escolino M, Esposito C (2016) Surgical approaches for varicocele in pediatric patient. Transl Pediatr 5(4):227–232. https://doi.org/10.21037/tp.2016.09.11
doi: 10.21037/tp.2016.09.11 pubmed: 27867844 pmcid: 5107384
Akkoç A, Aydın C, Topaktaş R, Altın S, Uçar M, Topçuoğlu M, Buğra Şentürk A (2019) Retroperitoneal high ligation versus subinguinal varicocelectomy: Effectiveness of two different varicocelectomy techniques on the treatment of painful varicocele. Andrologia 51(7):e13293. https://doi.org/10.1111/and.13293
doi: 10.1111/and.13293 pubmed: 30995701
Ding H, Tian J, Du W, Zhang L, Wang H, Wang Z (2012) Open non-microsurgical, laparoscopic or open microsurgical varicocelectomy for male infertility: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BJU Int 110(10):1536–1542. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2012.11093.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2012.11093.x pubmed: 22642226
Silveri M, Bassani F, Adorisio O (2015) Changing concepts in microsurgical pediatric varicocelectomy: is retroperitoneal approach better than subinguinal one? Urol J 12(1):2032–2035
pubmed: 25703914
Barroso U Jr, Andrade DM, Novaes H, Netto JM, Andrade J (2009) Surgical treatment of varicocele in children with open and laparoscopic Palomo technique: a systematic review of the literature. J Urol 181(6):2724–2728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.041
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.041 pubmed: 19375741
Nees SN, Glassberg KI (2011) Observations on hydroceles following adolescent varicocelectomy. J Urol 186(6):2402–2407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.116
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.116 pubmed: 22019156
Hassan JM, Adams MC, Pope JC 4th, Demarco RT, Brock JW 3rd (2006) Hydrocele formation following laparoscopic varicocelectomy. J Urol 175(3 Pt 1):1076–1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)00402-7
doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)00402-7 pubmed: 16469622
Esposito C, Turrà F, Del Conte F, Izzo S, Gargiulo F, Farina A, Severino G, Cerulo M, Escolino M (2019) Indocyanine green fluorescence lymphography: a new technique to perform lymphatic sparing laparoscopic palomo varicocelectomy in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 29(4):564–567. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2018.0624
doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0624 pubmed: 30676243
Rizkala E, Fishman A, Gitlin J, Zelkovic P, Franco I (2013) Long term outcomes of lymphatic sparing laparoscopic varicocelectomy. J Pediatr Urol 9(4):458–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2012.12.009
doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2012.12.009 pubmed: 23498876
Esposito C, Iaquinto M, Escolino M, Cortese G, De Pascale T, Chiarenza F, Cerulo M, Settimi A (2014) Technical standardization of laparoscopic lymphatic sparing varicocelectomy in children using isosulfan blue. J Pediatr Surg 49(4):660–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.12.022
doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.12.022 pubmed: 24726132
Capolicchio JP, El-Sherbiny M, Brzezinski A, Eassa W, Jednak R (2013) Dye-assisted lymphatic-sparing laparoscopic varicocelectomy in children. J Pediatr Urol 9(1):33–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.11.004
doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.11.004 pubmed: 22136973
Zundel S, Szavay P, Stanasel I (2021) Management of adolescent varicocele. Semin Pediatr Surg 30(4):151084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sempedsurg.2021.151084
doi: 10.1016/j.sempedsurg.2021.151084 pubmed: 34412881
Tandon S, Bennett D, Mark Nataraja R, Pacilli M (2023) Outcome following the surgical management of varicocele in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ther Adv Urol 15:17562872231206240. https://doi.org/10.1177/17562872231206239
doi: 10.1177/17562872231206239 pubmed: 37868369 pmcid: 10590051
Esposito C, Autorino G, Castagnetti M, Cerulo M, Coppola V, Cardone R, Esposito G, Borgogni R, Escolino M (2021) Robotics and future technical developments in pediatric urology. Semin Pediatr Surg 30(4):151082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sempedsurg.2021.151082
doi: 10.1016/j.sempedsurg.2021.151082 pubmed: 34412879
Reinhardt S, Thorup J, Joergensen PH, Fode M (2023) Robot-assisted laparoscopic varicocelectomy in a pediatric population. Pediatr Surg Int 39(1):202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-023-05488-w
doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05488-w pubmed: 37209246 pmcid: 10199840
Esposito C, Coppola V, Del Conte F, Cerulo M, Esposito G, Farina A, Crocetto F, Castagnetti M, Settimi A, Escolino M (2020) Near-Infrared fluorescence imaging using indocyanine green (ICG): emerging applications in pediatric urology. J Pediatr Urol 16(5):700–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.07.008
doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.07.008 pubmed: 32747308
Hidalgo-Tamola J, Sorensen MD, Bice JB, Lendvay TS (2009) Pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic varicocelectomy. J Endourol 23(8):1297–1300. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2008.0523
doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0523 pubmed: 19653871
Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b13ca2
doi: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b13ca2 pubmed: 19638912
Kass E, Marcol B (1992) Results of varicocele surgery in adolescents: a comparison of techniques. J Urol 148:694–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36696-x
doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36696-x pubmed: 1640548
Fast AM, Deibert CM, Van Batavia JP, Nees SN, Glassberg KI (2014) Adolescent varicocelectomy: does artery sparing influence recurrence rate and/or catch-up growth? Andrology 2(2):159–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2047-2927.2013.00142.x
doi: 10.1111/j.2047-2927.2013.00142.x pubmed: 24339439
Grober ED, Obrien J, Jarvi KA, Zini A (2004) Preservation of testicular arteries during subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy: clinical considerations. J Androl 25(5):740–743. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.2004.tb02849.x
doi: 10.1002/j.1939-4640.2004.tb02849.x pubmed: 15292104
Kim KS, Lee C, Song SH, Cho SJ, Park S, Moon KH, Ryu DS, Park S (2014) Impact of internal spermatic artery preservation during laparoscopic varicocelectomy on recurrence and the catch-up growth rate in adolescents. J Pediatr Urol 10(3):435–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.11.003
doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.11.003 pubmed: 24314819
Al-Kandari AM, Khudair A, Arafa A, Zanaty F, Ezz A, El-Shazly M (2018) Microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy in 100 consecutive cases: Spermatic cord vascular anatomy, recurrence and hydrocele outcome analysis. Arab J Urol 16(1):181–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2017.12.002
doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2017.12.002 pubmed: 29713549 pmcid: 5922226
Chiarenza SF, D’Agostino S, Scarpa MG, Fabbro M, Costa L, Musi L (2006) Lymphography prior to laparoscopic Palomo varicocelectomy to prevent postoperative hydrocele. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16(4):394–396. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2006.16.394
doi: 10.1089/lap.2006.16.394 pubmed: 16968191

Auteurs

Ciro Esposito (C)

Pediatric Surgery Unit, Federico II University Hospital, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.

Ernesto Leva (E)

Pediatric Surgery Unit, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

Marco Castagnetti (M)

Pediatric Urology Unit, Bambin Gesù Children Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Mariapina Cerulo (M)

Pediatric Surgery Unit, Federico II University Hospital, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.

Mery Cardarelli (M)

Pediatric Surgery Unit, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

Fulvia Del Conte (F)

Pediatric Surgery Unit, Federico II University Hospital, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.

Giovanni Esposito (G)

Advanced Biotechnology Center CEINGE, Naples, Italy.

Annalisa Chiodi (A)

Pediatric Surgery Unit, Federico II University Hospital, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.

Marco Chiarenza (M)

Urology Unit, Medical University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Claudia Di Mento (C)

Pediatric Surgery Unit, Federico II University Hospital, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.

Maria Escolino (M)

Pediatric Surgery Unit, Federico II University Hospital, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy. x.escolino@libero.it.

Classifications MeSH