HemoCue Hb-801 Provides More Accurate Hemoglobin Assessment in Blood Donors Than OrSense NBM-200.

Anemia Blood donation Blood donors Hemoglobin

Journal

Transfusion medicine reviews
ISSN: 1532-9496
Titre abrégé: Transfus Med Rev
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8709027

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 24 01 2024
revised: 11 03 2024
accepted: 14 03 2024
medline: 7 4 2024
pubmed: 7 4 2024
entrez: 6 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Hemoglobin levels are commonly assessed to prevent causing or worsening of anemia in prospective blood donors. We compared head-to-head the accuracy of different technologies for measuring hemoglobin suitable for use in mobile donation units. We included 144 persons donating platelets at the Central Institute for Blood Transfusion and Immunology in Innsbruck, Austria. Hemoglobin levels were measured in venous blood using the portable hemoglobinometer HemoCue Hb-801 and noninvasively using OrSense NBM-200, and compared to values obtained with the Sysmex XN-430, an automated hematology analyzer employing the sodium lauryl sulphate method, which is broadly used as reference method in everyday clinical practice. Mean age of participants was 34.2 years (SD 13.0); 34.0% were female. Hemoglobin values measured with HemoCue were more strongly correlated with the Sysmex XN-430 (r = 0.90 [95% CI: 0.87-0.93]) than measured with OrSense (r = 0.49 [0.35-0.60]). On average, HemoCue overestimated hemoglobin by 0.40 g/dL (0.31-0.48) and OrSense by 0.75 g/dL (95% CI: 0.54-0.96). When using OrSense, we found evidence for higher overestimation at higher hemoglobin levels (proportional bias) specifically in females but not in males (P

Identifiants

pubmed: 38581862
pii: S0887-7963(24)00016-6
doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2024.150826
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

150826

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: P.W. reports consultancy fees from Novartis Pharmaceuticals unrelated to this manuscript. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

Auteurs

Lisa Seekircher (L)

Department of Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Health Economics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Anita Siller (A)

Central Institute for Blood Transfusion and Immunology, University Hospital of Innsbruck, Tirol Kliniken GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria.

Marco Amato (M)

Central Institute for Blood Transfusion and Immunology, University Hospital of Innsbruck, Tirol Kliniken GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria.

Lena Tschiderer (L)

Department of Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Health Economics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Agnes Balog (A)

Central Institute for Blood Transfusion and Immunology, University Hospital of Innsbruck, Tirol Kliniken GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria.

Manfred Astl (M)

Central Institute for Blood Transfusion and Immunology, University Hospital of Innsbruck, Tirol Kliniken GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria.

Harald Schennach (H)

Central Institute for Blood Transfusion and Immunology, University Hospital of Innsbruck, Tirol Kliniken GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria.

Peter Willeit (P)

Department of Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Health Economics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: peter.willeit@i-med.ac.at.

Classifications MeSH