Oncoplastic reconstruction with breast-conserving treatment versus breast-conserving treatment alone in the elderly.
breast conserving therapy
elderly
immediate oncoplastic reduction
Journal
Journal of surgical oncology
ISSN: 1096-9098
Titre abrégé: J Surg Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0222643
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Apr 2024
07 Apr 2024
Historique:
revised:
29
02
2024
received:
01
12
2023
accepted:
25
03
2024
medline:
7
4
2024
pubmed:
7
4
2024
entrez:
7
4
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Oncoplastic reconstruction (IOR) performed in conjunction with breast conserving therapy (BCT) has been found to improve psychosocial well-being, reduce hospitalization time, and reduce cost burden. Few studies have looked at the safety profile, complication rates, and overall outcomes in patients ages 65 years and older undergoing IOR versus BCT alone. A retrospective, cross-sectional, single-institution medical record review was conducted of women diagnosed with breast cancer age 65 years or older who received IOR or BCT alone. Demographics, clinical data, and major and minor complication profiles were compared between cohorts. A total of 310 patients were included. Of these, 126 received IOR, while 184 received BCT alone. Age >85 was found to have a significantly higher risk for any complication and was an independent predictor for experiencing any complication (OR: 8.5, p = 0.015; OR: 1.06, p = 0.029). Major complication rates were significantly higher in the BCT cohort (16.9% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.023). IOR in the elderly is a safe option and was not found to be a predictor of experiencing higher complications. Patients who are 85 years and older had a higher risk of complications, and future studies may explore risk-benefit in that particular cohort of patients in which BCT is planned.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
Oncoplastic reconstruction (IOR) performed in conjunction with breast conserving therapy (BCT) has been found to improve psychosocial well-being, reduce hospitalization time, and reduce cost burden. Few studies have looked at the safety profile, complication rates, and overall outcomes in patients ages 65 years and older undergoing IOR versus BCT alone.
METHODS
METHODS
A retrospective, cross-sectional, single-institution medical record review was conducted of women diagnosed with breast cancer age 65 years or older who received IOR or BCT alone. Demographics, clinical data, and major and minor complication profiles were compared between cohorts.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 310 patients were included. Of these, 126 received IOR, while 184 received BCT alone. Age >85 was found to have a significantly higher risk for any complication and was an independent predictor for experiencing any complication (OR: 8.5, p = 0.015; OR: 1.06, p = 0.029). Major complication rates were significantly higher in the BCT cohort (16.9% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.023).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
IOR in the elderly is a safe option and was not found to be a predictor of experiencing higher complications. Patients who are 85 years and older had a higher risk of complications, and future studies may explore risk-benefit in that particular cohort of patients in which BCT is planned.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Chu CK, Hanson SE, Hwang RF, Wu LC. Oncoplastic partial breast reconstruction: concepts and techniques. Gland Surg. 2021;10(1):398‐410.
Munhoz AM, Montag E, Gemperli R. Oncoplastic breast surgery: indications, techniques and perspectives. Gland Surg. 2013;2(3):143‐157.
Hamdi M. Oncoplastic and reconstructive surgery of the breast. Breast. 2013;22:S100‐S105.
Losken A, Dugal CS, Styblo TM, Carlson GW. A meta‐analysis comparing breast conservation therapy alone to the oncoplastic technique. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72(2):145‐149.
Faulkner HR, Losken A. Modern approaches to oncoplastic surgical treatment. Clin Plast Surg. 2023;50(2):211‐221.
Kelsall JE, McCulley SJ, Brock L, Akerlund MTE, Macmillan RD. Comparing oncoplastic breast conserving surgery with mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: case‐matched patient reported outcomes. J Plastic, Recon Aesthetic Surg: JPRAS. 2017;70(10):1377‐1385.
Losken A, Smearman EL, Hart AM, Broecker JS, Carlson GW, Styblo TM. The impact oncoplastic reduction has on long‐term recurrence in breast conservation therapy. Plastic Recons Surg. 2022;149(5):867e‐875e.
Losken A, Hart AM, Chatterjee A. Updated evidence on the oncoplastic approach to breast conservation therapy. Plastic Recons Surg. 2017;140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):14S‐22S.
Zhou Y, Liu Y, Wang Y, Wu Y. Comparison of oncoplastic breast‐conserving therapy and standard breast‐conserving therapy in early‐stage breast cancer patients. Med Sci Monit. 2021;26:e927015.
Cochrane RA, Valasiadou P, Wilson ARM, Al‐Ghazal SK, Macmillan RD. Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast‐conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised. Br J Surg. 2003;90(12):1505‐1509.
Lazow SP, Riba L, Alapati A, James TA. Comparison of breast‐conserving therapy vs mastectomy in women under age 40: national trends and potential survival implications. Breast J. 2019;25(4):578‐584.
Haloua MH, Krekel NMA, Winters HAH, et al. A systematic review of oncoplastic breast‐conserving surgery: current weaknesses and future prospects. Ann Surg. 2013;257(4):609‐620.
Danko D, Ash ME, Brown OH, Losken A, Thompson PW. Implant‐based breast reconstruction in the elderly: complications and patient‐reported outcomes in women older than 70 years. Ann Plast Surg. 2023;91(1):55‐61.
James R, McCulley SJ, Macmillan RD. Oncoplastic and reconstructive breast surgery in the elderly. Br J Surg. 2015;102(5):480‐488.
Sada A, Day CN, Hoskin TL, Degnim AC, Habermann EB, Hieken TJ. Mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction in the elderly: trends and outcomes. Surgery. 2019;166(4):709‐714.
Mavioso C, Pereira C, Cardoso MJ. Oncoplastic surgery and breast reconstruction in the elderly: an unsolved conundrum. Ann Breast Surg. 2022;7:37.
Nijenhuis MV, Rutgers EJT. Who should not undergo breast conservation? Breast. 2013;22(suppl 2):S110‐S114.
Lin H‐S, Watts JN, Peel NM, Hubbard RE. Frailty and post‐operative outcomes in older surgical patients: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2016;16(1):157.