Percutaneous reduction of thoracolumbar fractures using monoaxial screws: Comparison of two instruments based on initial reduction and loss of reduction.
Anterior fusion
Loss of reduction
Monoaxial
Percutaneous posterior fixation
Spine
Thoracolumbar fracture
Journal
Brain & spine
ISSN: 2772-5294
Titre abrégé: Brain Spine
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9918470888906676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
02
01
2024
revised:
07
02
2024
accepted:
28
02
2024
medline:
8
4
2024
pubmed:
8
4
2024
entrez:
8
4
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Percutaneous techniques for the surgical treatment of vertebral fractures are constantly progressing. There are different biomechanics involved. Two percutaneous, monoaxial fixation systems with different reduction tools were analyzed in relation to their reduction capacity. Additionally, the impact of anterior fusion, fracture severity and bone quality on reduction and loss of reduction were examined. 117 cases were retrospectively included in the monocentric study. The subsample (N = 53) with complete data at follow-up times was used to analyze the influence of anterior fusion. The dependencies on fracture severity and bone quality were determined using Spearman and Pearson correlation. Both systems achieved equally good reduction (9° mean, 95%-CI: 8°-11°, p < 0.001). Anterior fused patients showed not significant (p = 0.057) less loss of reduction over time. Fracture severity had neither an influence on reduction or loss of reduction. Bone quality was positively correlated with greater amount of reduction and less loss of reduction. Early reduction within two days correlated with a greater amount of reduction (p = 0.006). Screw diameters and the patient's weight had no influence on loss of reduction. Complications occurred only in "V2" group. Both systems are equivalent in reduction ability. The additional anterior fusion did not result in significantly lower reduction losses. The subsample being small, is a limitation. Good bone quality correlates with better initial reduction and less reduction loss. A preoperative bone density measurement can lead to optimization of surgical techniques.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38584864
doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.102778
pii: S2772-5294(24)00034-1
pmc: PMC10995800
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
102778Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.