Percutaneous reduction of thoracolumbar fractures using monoaxial screws: Comparison of two instruments based on initial reduction and loss of reduction.

Anterior fusion Loss of reduction Monoaxial Percutaneous posterior fixation Spine Thoracolumbar fracture

Journal

Brain & spine
ISSN: 2772-5294
Titre abrégé: Brain Spine
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9918470888906676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 02 01 2024
revised: 07 02 2024
accepted: 28 02 2024
medline: 8 4 2024
pubmed: 8 4 2024
entrez: 8 4 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Percutaneous techniques for the surgical treatment of vertebral fractures are constantly progressing. There are different biomechanics involved. Two percutaneous, monoaxial fixation systems with different reduction tools were analyzed in relation to their reduction capacity. Additionally, the impact of anterior fusion, fracture severity and bone quality on reduction and loss of reduction were examined. 117 cases were retrospectively included in the monocentric study. The subsample (N = 53) with complete data at follow-up times was used to analyze the influence of anterior fusion. The dependencies on fracture severity and bone quality were determined using Spearman and Pearson correlation. Both systems achieved equally good reduction (9° mean, 95%-CI: 8°-11°, p < 0.001). Anterior fused patients showed not significant (p = 0.057) less loss of reduction over time. Fracture severity had neither an influence on reduction or loss of reduction. Bone quality was positively correlated with greater amount of reduction and less loss of reduction. Early reduction within two days correlated with a greater amount of reduction (p = 0.006). Screw diameters and the patient's weight had no influence on loss of reduction. Complications occurred only in "V2" group. Both systems are equivalent in reduction ability. The additional anterior fusion did not result in significantly lower reduction losses. The subsample being small, is a limitation. Good bone quality correlates with better initial reduction and less reduction loss. A preoperative bone density measurement can lead to optimization of surgical techniques.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38584864
doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.102778
pii: S2772-5294(24)00034-1
pmc: PMC10995800
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

102778

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Esra Aydin (E)

Department of Internal Medicine - Cardiology, DRK Kliniken Köpenick, Berlin, Germany.

Philipp Schenk (P)

Department of Science, Research and Education, BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle gGmbH, 06112, Halle, Germany.

Arija Jacobi (A)

Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, DIAKO Ev. Diakonie-Krankenhaus gGmbH, 28239, Bremen, Germany.

Thomas Mendel (T)

Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle, Germany.
Clinic for Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Halle, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany.

Friederike Klauke (F)

Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle, Germany.

Bernhard Wilhelm Ullrich (BW)

Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle, Germany.
Clinic for Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Halle, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany.

Classifications MeSH