Pediatric Critical Care Fellow Perception of Learning through Virtual Reality Bronchoscopy.

assessment bronchoscopy training feedback set standard virtual reality simulator

Journal

ATS scholar
ISSN: 2690-7097
Titre abrégé: ATS Sch
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101774447

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 04 08 2023
accepted: 28 11 2023
medline: 8 4 2024
pubmed: 8 4 2024
entrez: 8 4 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Virtual reality (VR) simulators have revolutionized training in bronchoscopy, offering unrestricted availability in a low-stakes learning environment and frequent assessments represented by automatic scoring. The VR assessments can be used to monitor and support learners' progression. How trainees perceive these assessments needs to be clarified. The objective of this study was to examine what assessments learners select to document and receive feedback on and what influences their decisions. We used a sequential explanatory mixed methods strategy. All participants were pediatric critical care medicine trainees requiring competency in bronchoscopy skills. During independent simulation practice, we collected the number of learning-focused practice attempts (scores not recorded), assessment-focused practice (scores recorded and reviewed by the instructor for feedback), and the amount of time each attempt lasted. After simulation training, we conducted interviews to explore learners' perceptions of assessment. There was no significant difference in the number of attempts for each practice type. The average time per learning-focused attempt was almost three times longer than the assessment-focused attempt (mean [standard deviation] 16 ± 1 min vs. 6 ± 3 min, respectively; During independent practice, learners took advantage of automatic assessments generated by the VR simulator to monitor their progression. However, the recording of scores from the simulation program to document learners' trajectory to a set goal was perceived as high stakes, discouraging learners from seeking supervisor feedback.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Virtual reality (VR) simulators have revolutionized training in bronchoscopy, offering unrestricted availability in a low-stakes learning environment and frequent assessments represented by automatic scoring. The VR assessments can be used to monitor and support learners' progression. How trainees perceive these assessments needs to be clarified.
Objective UNASSIGNED
The objective of this study was to examine what assessments learners select to document and receive feedback on and what influences their decisions.
Methods UNASSIGNED
We used a sequential explanatory mixed methods strategy. All participants were pediatric critical care medicine trainees requiring competency in bronchoscopy skills. During independent simulation practice, we collected the number of learning-focused practice attempts (scores not recorded), assessment-focused practice (scores recorded and reviewed by the instructor for feedback), and the amount of time each attempt lasted. After simulation training, we conducted interviews to explore learners' perceptions of assessment.
Results UNASSIGNED
There was no significant difference in the number of attempts for each practice type. The average time per learning-focused attempt was almost three times longer than the assessment-focused attempt (mean [standard deviation] 16 ± 1 min vs. 6 ± 3 min, respectively;
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
During independent practice, learners took advantage of automatic assessments generated by the VR simulator to monitor their progression. However, the recording of scores from the simulation program to document learners' trajectory to a set goal was perceived as high stakes, discouraging learners from seeking supervisor feedback.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38585579
doi: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2023-0097IN
pmc: PMC10995860
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

174-183

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 by the American Thoracic Society.

Auteurs

Liron Talmi (L)

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Sabine Nabecker (S)

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Dominique Piquette (D)

Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and.
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Briseida Mema (B)

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and.

Classifications MeSH