Sexism in a UK-wide medical examination.

gender inequality medical education medical examinations

Journal

Clinical medicine (London, England)
ISSN: 1473-4893
Titre abrégé: Clin Med (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101092853

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2022
Historique:
medline: 1 11 2022
pubmed: 1 11 2022
entrez: 8 4 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Gender bias and sexism in the health profession in the UK has been highlighted as a major problem. Efforts to reduce this must include medical training and examinations. The Situational Judgment Test (SJT) is an examination that must be passed to work as a foundation doctor in the UK; and is taken by all UK medical students. We analysed gender balance in all 215 scenarios included in the official practice papers for the SJT. We found that senior doctors were more than twice as likely to be men than women, while there was no significant gender difference in representation of foundation year-1 doctors, other health professionals or patients/relatives. This inequality has the potential to reinforce gender biases in healthcare. Medical examinations can, instead, represent an opportunity for prejudices to be challenged.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38589167
pii: S1470-2118(24)02643-5
doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2022-0360
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

584-585

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 © 2022 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier Limited on behalf of the Royal College of Physicians. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Sarah E Fox (SE)

North, Central and East London Foundation School, London, UK. Electronic address: s.fox11@nhs.net.

Ben Paxton (B)

North, Central and East London Foundation School, London, UK.

Classifications MeSH