Codesigned online cognitive bias modification of interpretations for anxiety and depression in children: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

anxiety disorders child & adolescent psychiatry depression & mood disorders

Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Apr 2024
Historique:
medline: 9 4 2024
pubmed: 9 4 2024
entrez: 8 4 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Previous research has shown that cognitive bias modification of interpretations (CBM-I) may be a promising intervention for anxiety in youth; however, results are mixed. Given the high comorbidity between anxiety and depression in youth, it is surprising that no child studies have targeted biases associated with both. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of an online CBM-I intervention (Mindmaster) for children with symptom scores of anxiety or depression above a borderline or clinical threshold. The intervention has been codesigned with children, parents and mental health professionals to promote user engagement. The study is a randomised controlled trial, with two parallel arms. Participants are 143 children aged 8-10 years with scores of anxiety and/or depressive symptoms above a borderline or clinical threshold. They will be allocated to either the intervention group or the waitlist control group. The intervention consists of 2 weeks of online CBM-I training, with four sessions (10-15 min) per week. Outcome assessments will be conducted at baseline, 4 weeks after baseline (post-training/post-waitlist) and 8 weeks after baseline (follow-up) for the intervention group only. The primary outcome is interpretation bias. Secondary outcomes are anxiety and depressive symptoms and life interference. Analyses will be conducted within an intention-to-treat framework using mixed models for repeated measures. The study was approved by the University of New South Wales Human Research Ethics Committee (HC220758). Findings will be reported to (1) participating families; (2) presented at scientific conferences and (3) disseminated to peer-review publications. Data will be available from the corresponding author on request. ACTRN12622001493730.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38589253
pii: bmjopen-2023-078652
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078652
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e078652

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Gemma Sicouri (G)

Black Dog Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia g.sicouri@blackdog.org.au.
School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Emily Daniel (E)

Black Dog Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Elske Salemink (E)

Department of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Andrew Mackinnon (A)

Black Dog Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Abigail Allsop (A)

Black Dog Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Jennifer Hudson (J)

Black Dog Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Classifications MeSH