COVID-19 critical care triage across Canada: a narrative synthesis and ethical analysis of early provincial triage protocols.

Triage aux soins intensifs pendant la COVID-19 au Canada : une synthèse narrative et une analyse éthique des premiers protocoles provinciaux de triage.

COVID-19 clinical ethics health policy intensive care rationing triage

Journal

Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie

ISSN: 1496-8975

Titre abrégé: Can J Anaesth

Pays: United States

ID NLM: 8701709

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Apr 2024

Historique:

received: 01 05 2023

accepted: 10 01 2024

revised: 23 12 2023

medline: 9 4 2024

pubmed: 9 4 2024

entrez: 8 4 2024

Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The COVID-19 pandemic created conditions of scarcity that led many provinces within Canada to develop triage protocols for critical care resources. In this study, we sought to undertake a narrative synthesis and ethical analysis of early provincial pandemic triage protocols. We collected provincial triage protocols through personal correspondence with academic and political stakeholders between June and August 2020. Protocol data were extracted independently by two researchers and compared for accuracy and agreement. We separated data into three categories for comparative content analysis: protocol development, ethical framework, and protocol content. Our ethical analysis was informed by a procedural justice framework. We obtained a total of eight provincial triage protocols. Protocols were similar in content, although age, physiologic scores, and functional status were variably incorporated. Most protocols were developed through a multidisciplinary, expert-driven, consensus process, and many were informed by influenza pandemic guidelines previously developed in Ontario. All protocols employed tiered morality-focused exclusion criteria to determine scarce resource allocation at the level of regional health care systems. None included a public engagement phase, although targeted consultation with public advocacy groups and relevant stakeholders was undertaken in select provinces. Most protocols were not publicly available in 2020. Early provincial COVID-19 triage protocols were developed by dedicated expert committees under challenging circumstances. Nonetheless, few were publicly available, and public consultation was limited. No protocols were ever implemented, including during periods of extreme critical care surge. A national approach to pandemic triage that incorporates additional aspects of procedural justice should be considered in preparation for future pandemics. RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: La pandémie de COVID-19 a créé des conditions de pénurie qui ont amené de nombreuses provinces canadiennes à élaborer des protocoles de triage pour l’allocation des ressources en soins intensifs. Dans le cadre de cette étude, nous avons cherché à réaliser une synthèse narrative et une analyse éthique des premiers protocoles provinciaux de triage lors de la pandémie. MéTHODE: Nous avons recueilli les protocoles de triage provinciaux en correspondant de façon personnelle avec des intervenant·es universitaires et politiques entre juin et août 2020. Les données des protocoles ont été extraites indépendamment par deux personnes de l’équipe de recherche et comparées pour en vérifier l’exactitude et la concordance. Nous avons séparé les données en trois catégories pour l’analyse comparative du contenu : l’élaboration d’un protocole, le cadre éthique et le contenu du protocole. Notre analyse éthique s’est appuyée sur un cadre de justice procédurale. RéSULTATS: Nous avons obtenu un total de huit protocoles de triage provinciaux. Les protocoles étaient similaires dans leur contenu, bien que l’âge, les scores physiologiques et l’état fonctionnel aient été incorporés de manière variable. La plupart des protocoles ont été élaborés dans le cadre d’un processus consensuel multidisciplinaire dirigé par des expert·es, et bon nombre d’entre eux ont été élaborés en fonction des lignes directrices sur la pandémie de grippe élaborées antérieurement en Ontario. Tous les protocoles utilisaient des critères d’exclusion à plusieurs niveaux axés sur la moralité pour déterminer l’affectation de ressources limitées au niveau des systèmes de soins de santé régionaux. Aucun ne comportait de phase de mobilisation du public, bien que des consultations ciblées aient été menées auprès des groupes de défense des droits du public et des instances concernées dans certaines provinces. La plupart des protocoles n’étaient pas accessibles au public en 2020. CONCLUSION: Les premiers protocoles provinciaux de triage pour la COVID-19 ont été élaborés par des comités spécialisés d’expert·es dans des circonstances difficiles. Néanmoins, peu d’entre eux étaient accessibles au public et la consultation publique était limitée. Aucun protocole n’a été mis en œuvre, même pendant les périodes de pointe extrême en soins intensifs. Une approche nationale du triage en cas de pandémie qui intègre d’autres aspects de justice procédurale devrait être envisagée en prévision de futures pandémies.

Autres résumés

Type: Publisher (fre)

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: La pandémie de COVID-19 a créé des conditions de pénurie qui ont amené de nombreuses provinces canadiennes à élaborer des protocoles de triage pour l’allocation des ressources en soins intensifs. Dans le cadre de cette étude, nous avons cherché à réaliser une synthèse narrative et une analyse éthique des premiers protocoles provinciaux de triage lors de la pandémie. MéTHODE: Nous avons recueilli les protocoles de triage provinciaux en correspondant de façon personnelle avec des intervenant·es universitaires et politiques entre juin et août 2020. Les données des protocoles ont été extraites indépendamment par deux personnes de l’équipe de recherche et comparées pour en vérifier l’exactitude et la concordance. Nous avons séparé les données en trois catégories pour l’analyse comparative du contenu : l’élaboration d’un protocole, le cadre éthique et le contenu du protocole. Notre analyse éthique s’est appuyée sur un cadre de justice procédurale. RéSULTATS: Nous avons obtenu un total de huit protocoles de triage provinciaux. Les protocoles étaient similaires dans leur contenu, bien que l’âge, les scores physiologiques et l’état fonctionnel aient été incorporés de manière variable. La plupart des protocoles ont été élaborés dans le cadre d’un processus consensuel multidisciplinaire dirigé par des expert·es, et bon nombre d’entre eux ont été élaborés en fonction des lignes directrices sur la pandémie de grippe élaborées antérieurement en Ontario. Tous les protocoles utilisaient des critères d’exclusion à plusieurs niveaux axés sur la moralité pour déterminer l’affectation de ressources limitées au niveau des systèmes de soins de santé régionaux. Aucun ne comportait de phase de mobilisation du public, bien que des consultations ciblées aient été menées auprès des groupes de défense des droits du public et des instances concernées dans certaines provinces. La plupart des protocoles n’étaient pas accessibles au public en 2020. CONCLUSION: Les premiers protocoles provinciaux de triage pour la COVID-19 ont été élaborés par des comités spécialisés d’expert·es dans des circonstances difficiles. Néanmoins, peu d’entre eux étaient accessibles au public et la consultation publique était limitée. Aucun protocole n’a été mis en œuvre, même pendant les périodes de pointe extrême en soins intensifs. Une approche nationale du triage en cas de pandémie qui intègre d’autres aspects de justice procédurale devrait être envisagée en prévision de futures pandémies.

Identifiants

DOI: 10.1007/s12630-024-02744-y PMID: 38589739

pubmed: 38589739

doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02744-y

pii: 10.1007/s12630-024-02744-y

doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

Subventions

Organisme : Foundation for the National Institutes of Health

ID : T32HL007820

Informations de copyright

Références

Maves RC, Downar J, Dichter JR, et al. Triage of scarce critical care resources in COVID-19: an implementation guide for regional allocation: an expert panel report of the Task Force for Mass Critical Care and the American College of Chest Physicians. Chest 2020; 158: 212–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.063

doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.063 pubmed: 32289312

Sprung CL, Joynt GM, Christian MD, Truog RD, Rello J, Nates JL. Adult ICU triage during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: who will live and who will die? Recommendations to Improve Survival. Crit Care Med 2020; 48: 1196–202. https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000004410

doi: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000004410 pubmed: 32697491 pmcid: 7217126

Antommaria AH, Gibb TS, McGuire AL, et al. Ventilator triage policies during the COVID-19 pandemic at U.S. hospitals associated with members of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors. Ann Intern Med 2020; 173: 188–94. https://doi.org/10.7326/m20-1738

Aquino YS, Rogers WA, Scully JL, Magrabi F, Carter SM. Ethical guidance for hard decisions: a critical review of early international COVID-19 ICU triage guidelines. Health Care Anal 2022; 30: 163–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-021-00442-0

doi: 10.1007/s10728-021-00442-0 pubmed: 34704198

Ghanbari V, Ardalan A, Zareiyan A, Nejati A, Hanfling D, Bagheri A. Ethical prioritization of patients during disaster triage: a systematic review of current evidence. Int Emerg Nurs 2019; 43: 126–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2018.10.004

doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2018.10.004 pubmed: 30612846

Devereaux AV, Dichter JR, Christian MD, et al. Definitive care for the critically ill during a disaster: a framework for allocation of scarce resources in mass critical care: from a Task Force for Mass Critical Care summit meeting, January 26–27, 2007, Chicago, IL. Chest 2008; 133: 51S–66. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.07-2693

doi: 10.1378/chest.07-2693 pubmed: 18460506

Thompson AK, Faith K, Gibson JL, Upshur RE. Pandemic influenza preparedness: an ethical framework to guide decision-making. BMC Med Ethics 2006; 7: E12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-7-12

doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-7-12 pubmed: 17144926

Biddison LD, Berkowitz KA, Courtney B, et al. Ethical considerations: care of the critically ill and injured during pandemics and disasters: CHEST consensus statement. Chest 2014; 146: e145S–55. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.14-0742

doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0742 pubmed: 25144262

Canada Health Act, RCS 1985, c. C-6. Available from URL: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-6/page-1.html (accessed January 2024).

Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft Excel. Available from URL: https://office.microsoft.com/excel (accessed January 2024).

Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, et al. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: a product from the ESRC Methods Programme; 2006. Available from URL: https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/media/lancaster-university/content-assets/documents/fhm/dhr/chir/NSsynthesisguidanceVersion1-April2006.pdf (accessed January 2024).

Stemler S. An overview of content analysis. Pract Assess Res Evaluation 2001; 7. https://doi.org/10.7275/z6fm-2e34

Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005; 15: 1277–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687 pubmed: 16204405

Daniels N. Justice, fair procedures, and the goals of medicine. Hastings Cent Rep 1996; 26: 10–2. https://doi.org/10.2307/3528745

doi: 10.2307/3528745 pubmed: 8970786

Daniels N. Accountability for reasonableness. BMJ 2000; 321: 1300–1. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7272.1300

doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7272.1300 pubmed: 11090498 pmcid: 1119050

Downar J, Smith MJ, Godkin D, et al. A framework for critical care triage during a major surge in critical illness. Can J Anesth 2022; 69: 774–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-022-02231-2

doi: 10.1007/s12630-022-02231-2 pubmed: 35322377

Valiani S, Terrett L, Gebhardt C, Prokopchuk-Gauk O, Isinger M. Development of a framework for critical care resource allocation for the COVID-19 pandemic in Saskatchewan. CMAJ 2020; 192: E1067–73. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.200756

doi: 10.1503/cmaj.200756 pubmed: 32928804 pmcid: 7513942

Christian MD, Hawryluck L, Wax RS, et al. Development of a triage protocol for critical care during an influenza pandemic. CMAJ 2006; 175: 1377–81. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.060911

doi: 10.1503/cmaj.060911 pubmed: 17116904 pmcid: 1635763

Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation. EDM—adult critical care triage and resource allocation protocol for pandemic influenza; 2009. Available from URL: https://www.longwoods.com/articles/images/PandemicProtocol.pdf (accessed January 2024).

Ontario Health. Clinical triage protocol for major surge in COVID pandemic; 2020. Available from URL: https://med.uottawa.ca/pathology/sites/med.uottawa.ca.pathology/files/clinical_triage_protocol_for_major_surge_in_covid_pandemic_-_march_28_20205.pdf (accessed January 2024).

White DB. Allocation of scarce critical care resources during a public health emergency: a model hospital policy; 2020. Available from URL: https://bioethics.pitt.edu/sites/default/files/Univ%20Pittsburgh%20-%20Allocation%20of%20Scarce%20Critical%20Care%20Resources%20During%20a%20Public%20Health%20Emergency.pdf (accessed January 2024).

Fins JJ, Miller FG. Proportionality, pandemics, and medical ethics. Am J Med 2020; 133: 1243–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.06.008

doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.06.008 pubmed: 32653418 pmcid: 7347467

Ferreira FL, Bota DP, Bross A, Mélot C, Vincent JL. Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients. JAMA 2001; 286: 1754–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.14.1754

doi: 10.1001/jama.286.14.1754 pubmed: 11594901

Leteurtre S, Duhamel A, Salleron J, et al. PELOD-2: an update of the PEdiatric logistic organ dysfunction score. Crit Care Med 2013; 41: 1761–73. https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e31828a2bbd

doi: 10.1097/ccm.0b013e31828a2bbd pubmed: 23685639

Favaro A, St. Philip E, Cousins B. Coronavirus: Ontario hospitals on the verge of enacting ‘last resort’ triage protocols; 2021. Available from URL: https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/coronavirus/ontario-hospitals-on-the-verge-of-enacting-last-resort-triage-protocols-1.5406746 (accessed January 2024).

Snowdon W. Life and death: what critical-care triage could mean in Alberta ICUs; 2021. Available from URL: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/emergency-covid-triage-alberta-1.6178253#:~:text=Alberta%27s%20critical%20care%20triage%20protocol,in%20preparation%20for%20the%20worst . (accessed January 2024).

Piscitello GM, Kapania EM, Miller WD, Rojas JC, Siegler M, Parker WF. Variation in ventilator allocation guidelines by US state during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: a systematic review. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3: e2012606. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12606

doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12606 pubmed: 32558916 pmcid: 7305526

Raschke RA, Agarwal S, Rangan P, Heise CW, Curry SC. Discriminant accuracy of the SOFA score for determining the probable mortality of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation. JAMA 2021; 325: 1469–70. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.1545

doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1545 pubmed: 33595630 pmcid: 7890534

Shahpori R, Stelfox HT, Doig CJ, Boiteau PJ, Zygun DA. Sequential organ failure assessment in H1N1 pandemic planning. Crit Care Med 2011; 39: 827–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e318206d548

doi: 10.1097/ccm.0b013e318206d548 pubmed: 21263327

Mello MM, Persad G, White DB. Respecting disability rights—toward improved crisis standards of care. N Engl J Med 2020; 383: e26. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp2011997

doi: 10.1056/nejmp2011997 pubmed: 32427433

Schmidt H, Roberts DE, Eneanya ND. Rationing, racism and justice: advancing the debate around ‘colourblind’ COVID-19 ventilator allocation. J Med Ethics 2022; 48: 126–30. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106856

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106856 pubmed: 33408091

Solomon MZ, Wynia MK, Gostin LO. Covid-19 crisis triage—optimizing health outcomes and disability rights. N Engl J Med 2020; 383: e27. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp2008300

doi: 10.1056/nejmp2008300 pubmed: 32427434

Schmidt H, Roberts DE, Eneanya ND. Sequential organ failure assessment, ventilator rationing and evolving triage guidance: new evidence underlines the need to recognise and revise, unjust allocation frameworks. J Med Ethics 2022; 48: 136–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2021-107696

doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107696 pubmed: 34635502

Sonmez T, Pathak PA, Ünver MU, Persad G, Truog RD, White DB. Categorized priority systems: a new tool for fairly allocating scarce medical resources in the face of profound social inequities. Chest 2021; 159: 1294–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.12.019

doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.12.019 pubmed: 33373597

Persad G, Wertheimer A, Emanuel EJ. Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions. Lancet 2009; 373: 423–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60137-9

doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60137-9 pubmed: 19186274

Biddison EL, Gwon HS, Schoch-Spana M, et al. Scarce resource allocation during disasters: a mixed-method community engagement study. Chest 2018; 153: 187–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2017.08.001

doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.08.001 pubmed: 28802695

Winsor S, Bensimon CM, Sibbald R, et al. Identifying prioritization criteria to supplement critical care triage protocols for the allocation of ventilators during a pandemic influenza. Healthc Q 2014; 17: 44–51. https://doi.org/10.12927/hcq.2014.23833

Cuartas PA, Santos HT, Levy BM, Gong MN, Powell T, Chuang E. How useful are sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score-based ventilator triage guidelines during the covid-19 pandemic? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2021; 203: A1494. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_MeetingAbstracts.A1494

doi: 10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_MeetingAbstracts.A1494

Wunsch H, Hill AD, Bosch N, et al. Comparison of 2 triage scoring guidelines for allocation of mechanical ventilators. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3: e2029250. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29250

doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29250 pubmed: 33315112 pmcid: 7737087

Hick JL, Hanfling D, Wynia MK, Toner E. Crisis standards of care and COVID-19: what did we learn? How do we ensure equity? What should we do? NAM Perspect 2021; https://doi.org/10.31478/202108e

Kadri SS, Sun J, Lawandi A, et al. Association between caseload surge and COVID-19 survival in 558 U.S. hospitals, March to August 2020. Ann Intern Med 2021; 174: 1240–51. https://doi.org/10.7326/m21-1213

Bravata DM, Perkins AJ, Myers LJ, et al. Association of intensive care unit patient load and demand with mortality rates in US Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4: e2034266. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.34266

doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.34266 pubmed: 33464319 pmcid: 7816100

Rosenbaum L. Facing Covid-19 in Italy—ethics, logistics, and therapeutics on the epidemic’s front line. N Engl J Med 2020; 382: 1873–5. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp2005492

doi: 10.1056/nejmp2005492 pubmed: 32187459

Close E, Willmott L, Cockburn T, Young S, Cairns W, White BP. Transparent triage policies during the COVID-19 pandemic: a critical part of medico-legal risk management for clinicians. Med J Aust 2021; 215: 71–4. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.51079

doi: 10.5694/mja2.51079 pubmed: 34028033 pmcid: 8242503

McGrail K. Excess mortality, COVID-19 and health care systems in Canada. CMAJ 2022; 194: E741–5. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.220337

doi: 10.1503/cmaj.220337 pubmed: 35636753 pmcid: 9259423

ASPR TRACIE. Crisis standards of care during COVID-19: summary of state actions; 2022. Available from URL: https://asprtracie.hhs.gov/technical-resources/resource/10803/crisis-standards-of-care-during-covid-19-summary-of-state-actions (accessed January 2024).

Barasz K, Hagerty SF. Hoping for the worst? A paradoxical preference for bad news. J Consum Res 2021; 48: 270–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucab004

doi: 10.1093/jcr/ucab004

Simonson I. The influence of anticipating regret and responsibility on purchase decisions. J Consum Res 1992; 19: 105–18. https://doi.org/10.1086/209290

doi: 10.1086/209290

Messick DM, Bazerman MH. Ethical leadership and the psychology of decision making; 1996. Available from URL: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/ethical-leadership-and-the-psychology-of-decision-making/ (accessed January 2024).

Kelen GD, Marcozzi D, Marx JJ, Kachalia A. Criteria for declaring crisis standards of care: a single, uniform model; 2023. Available from URL: https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full//10.1056/CAT.22.0269 (accessed January 2024).

Gordon SH, Huberfeld N, Jones DK. What federalism means for the US response to coronavirus disease 2019. JAMA Health Forum 2020; 1: e200510. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2020.0510

doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2020.0510 pubmed: 36218490

Emergencies Act, RSC, 1985, c. 22 (4th Supp). Available from URL: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/e-4.5/page-1.html (accessed January 2024).

BBC News. Canada’s use of emergency powers justified—report; 2023. Available from URL: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-64683747# (accessed January 2024).

Owens B. Should triage guidelines be revisited ahead of a second wave of COVID-19? CMAJ 2020; 192: E690–1. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1095876

doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1095876 pubmed: 32571887 pmcid: 7828855