Healing Architecture in Birthing Rooms: A Scoping Review.

birth satisfaction birthing rooms delivery room healing architecture hospital design multisensory birthing room physical environment

Journal

HERD
ISSN: 2167-5112
Titre abrégé: HERD
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101537529

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Apr 2024
Historique:
medline: 9 4 2024
pubmed: 9 4 2024
entrez: 9 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The purpose of this scoping review is to map the knowledge about the multisensory birthing room regarding the birth experience and birth outcomes. The concept of multisensory birthing rooms is relatively novel, making it relevant to explore its impact. Five databases were searched. The search was limited to articles in English, Danish, Norwegian, and Swedish. There were no time limitations. Fourteen relevant articles were identified providing knowledge about multisensory birthing rooms. Eight articles focused on birth experience, six articles focused on birth outcome, and one on the organization of the maternity care. Seven of the studies identified that sensory birthing rooms have a positive impact on the birth experience and one qualitative study could not demonstrate a better overall birth experience. Five articles described an improvement for selected birth outcomes. On the other hand, a randomized controlled trial study could not demonstrate an effect on either the use of oxytocin or birth outcomes such as pain and cesarean section. The definition and description of the concept weaken the existing studies scientifically. This scoping review revealed that multisensory birthing rooms have many definitions and variations in the content of the sensory exposure; therefore, it is difficult to standardize and evaluate the effect of its use. There is limited knowledge concerning the multisensory birthing room and its impact on the birth experience and the birth outcome. Multisensory birthing rooms may have a positive impact on the birth experience. Whereas there are conflicting results regarding birth outcomes.

Sections du résumé

AIM UNASSIGNED
The purpose of this scoping review is to map the knowledge about the multisensory birthing room regarding the birth experience and birth outcomes.
BACKGROUND UNASSIGNED
The concept of multisensory birthing rooms is relatively novel, making it relevant to explore its impact.
METHODS UNASSIGNED
Five databases were searched. The search was limited to articles in English, Danish, Norwegian, and Swedish. There were no time limitations. Fourteen relevant articles were identified providing knowledge about multisensory birthing rooms.
RESULTS UNASSIGNED
Eight articles focused on birth experience, six articles focused on birth outcome, and one on the organization of the maternity care. Seven of the studies identified that sensory birthing rooms have a positive impact on the birth experience and one qualitative study could not demonstrate a better overall birth experience. Five articles described an improvement for selected birth outcomes. On the other hand, a randomized controlled trial study could not demonstrate an effect on either the use of oxytocin or birth outcomes such as pain and cesarean section. The definition and description of the concept weaken the existing studies scientifically.
CONCLUSIONS UNASSIGNED
This scoping review revealed that multisensory birthing rooms have many definitions and variations in the content of the sensory exposure; therefore, it is difficult to standardize and evaluate the effect of its use. There is limited knowledge concerning the multisensory birthing room and its impact on the birth experience and the birth outcome. Multisensory birthing rooms may have a positive impact on the birth experience. Whereas there are conflicting results regarding birth outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38591577
doi: 10.1177/19375867241238439
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

19375867241238439

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest and none was declared.

Auteurs

Anya Eidhammer (A)

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Denmark.

Julie Glavind (J)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.

Conni Skrubbeltrang (C)

Medical Library, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark.

Dorte Melgaard (D)

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Denmark.
Department of Acute Medicine and Trauma Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark.

Classifications MeSH