Measurement of Phytochrome B Thermal Reversion Rates In Vivo.

In vivo spectroscopy Phytochrome Ratiospectrophotometer Thermal reversion

Journal

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)
ISSN: 1940-6029
Titre abrégé: Methods Mol Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9214969

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
medline: 10 4 2024
pubmed: 10 4 2024
entrez: 9 4 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Thermal reversion of phytochromes is the light-independent but strongly temperature-dependent relaxation of the light-activated Pfr form of phytochromes back into the inactive Pr ground state. The thermal reversion rates of different phytochromes vary considerably. For phytochrome B (phyB), thermal reversion represents a critical parameter affecting phyB activity as it reduces the active phyB Pfr pool, accelerated by increasing temperatures. Phytochromes are dimers existing in three different states: Pfr-Pfr homodimer, Pfr-Pr heterodimer, and Pr-Pr homodimer. Consequently, thermal reversion occurs in two steps, with Pfr-Pfr to Pfr-Pr reversion being much slower than reversion from Pfr-Pr to Pr-Pr. To measure thermal reversion in vivo, the relative proportion of Pfr in relation to the total amount of phytochrome (Ptot) must be determined in living samples. This is accomplished by in vivo spectroscopy utilizing dual wavelength ratiospectrophotometers, optimized for assaying phytochromes in highly scattering plant material. The method is depending on the photoreversibility of phytochromes displaying light-induced absorbance changes in response to actinic irradiation. In this chapter, we describe the experimental design and explain step-by-step the calculations necessary to determine the thermal reversion rates of phyB in vivo, taking into account phytochrome dimerization.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38594530
doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3814-9_9
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

85-93

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Références

Mancinelli AL (1994) The physiology of phytochrome action. In: Kendrick RE, Kronenberg GHM (eds) Photomorphogenesis in plants. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 211–269
doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-1884-2_10
Klose C, Nagy F, Schäfer E (2020) Thermal reversion of plant phytochromes. Mol Plant 13:386–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2019.12.004
doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2019.12.004 pubmed: 31812690
Legris M, Klose C, Burgie ES et al (2016) Phytochrome B integrates light and temperature signals in Arabidopsis. Science 354:897–900. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf5656
doi: 10.1126/science.aaf5656 pubmed: 27789798
Viczián A, Klose C, Ádám É et al (2017) New insights of red light-induced development. Plant Cell Environ 40:2457–2468. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12880
doi: 10.1111/pce.12880 pubmed: 27943362
Burgie ES, Gannam ZTK, McLoughlin KE et al (2021) Differing biophysical properties underpin the unique signaling potentials within the plant phytochrome photoreceptor families. PNAS 118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2105649118
Klose C, Venezia F, Hussong A et al (2015) Systematic analysis of how phytochrome B dimerization determines its specificity. Nature Plants 1:15090. https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2015.90
doi: 10.1038/nplants.2015.90 pubmed: 27250256
Jung J-H, Domijan M, Klose C et al (2016) Phytochromes function as thermosensors in Arabidopsis. Science 354:886–889. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf6005
doi: 10.1126/science.aaf6005 pubmed: 27789797
Gross J, Seyfried M, Fukshansky L et al (1984) In: Smith H, Holmes MG (eds) In vivo spectrophotometry. Methods in photomorphogenesis, biological technique series. Academic Press, London, pp 131–157
Klose C (2019) In vivo spectroscopy: in: Hiltbrunner, A. (eds) Phytochromes. Methods Mol Biol 2026:113–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9612-4_8
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9612-4_8 pubmed: 31317406
Butler WL, Norris KH, Siegelman HW et al (1959) Detection, assay, and preliminary purification of the pigment controlling photoresponsive development of plants. PNAS 45:1703–1708
doi: 10.1073/pnas.45.12.1703 pubmed: 16590561 pmcid: 222787
Pratt LH, Wampler JE, Rich ES (1984) An automated dual-wavelength spectrophotometer optimized for phytochrome assay. Instrum Sci Technol 13:269–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/10739148408544183
doi: 10.1080/10739148408544183
Lamparter T, Hughes J, Hartmann E (1994) A fully automated dual-wavelength photometer for phytochrome measurements and its application to phytochrome from chlorophyll-containing extracts. Photochem Photobiol 60:179–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.1994.tb05088.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1994.tb05088.x
Grill R (1977) Influence of chlorophyll content on phytochrome measurements in turnip cotyledons. Planta 134:11–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00390087
doi: 10.1007/BF00390087 pubmed: 24419572

Auteurs

Cornelia Klose (C)

Institute of Biology II, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. cornelia.klose@biologie.uni-freiburg.de.

Andreas Hiltbrunner (A)

Institute of Biology II, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Signaling Research Centers BIOSS and CIBSS, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Classifications MeSH