Survival among children under-five in India: a parametric multilevel survival approach.

India Intra-class Correlation Parametric Survival analysis Under-five Mortality

Journal

BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 12 01 2022
accepted: 25 01 2023
medline: 10 4 2024
pubmed: 10 4 2024
entrez: 9 4 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Many studies have been conducted on under-five mortality in India and most of them focused on the associations between individual-level factors and under-five mortality risks. On the contrary, only a scarce number of literatures talked about contextual level effect on under-five mortality. Hence, it is very important to have thorough study of under-five mortality at various levels. This can be done by applying multilevel analysis, a method that assesses both fixed and random effects in a single model. The multilevel analysis allows extracting the influence of individual and community characteristics on under-five mortality. Hence, this study would contribute substantially in understanding the under-five mortality from a different perspective. The study used data from the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) acquired in India, i.e., the fourth round of National Family and Health Survey (2015-16). It is a nationally representative repeated cross-sectional data. Multilevel Parametric Survival Model (MPSM) was employed to assess the influence of contextual correlates on the outcome. The assumption behind this study is that 'individuals' (i.e., level-1) are nested within 'districts' (i.e., level-2), and districts are enclosed within 'states' (i.e., level-3). This suggests that people have varying health conditions, residing in dissimilar communities with different characteristics. Highest under-five mortality i.e., 3.85% are happening among those women whose birth interval is less than two years. In case of parity, around 4% under-five mortality is among women with Third and above order parity. Further, findings from the full model is that ICC values of 1.17 and 0.65% are the correlation of the likelihood of having under-five mortality risk among people residing in the state and district communities, respectively. Besides, the risk of dying was increased alarmingly in the first year of life and slowly to aged 3 years and then it remains steady. This study has revealed that both aspects viz. individual and contextual effect of the community are necessary to address the importance variations in under-five mortality in India. In order to ensure substantial reduction in under-five mortality, findings of the study support some policy initiatives that involves the need to think beyond individual level effects and considering contextual characteristics.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Many studies have been conducted on under-five mortality in India and most of them focused on the associations between individual-level factors and under-five mortality risks. On the contrary, only a scarce number of literatures talked about contextual level effect on under-five mortality. Hence, it is very important to have thorough study of under-five mortality at various levels. This can be done by applying multilevel analysis, a method that assesses both fixed and random effects in a single model. The multilevel analysis allows extracting the influence of individual and community characteristics on under-five mortality. Hence, this study would contribute substantially in understanding the under-five mortality from a different perspective.
METHOD METHODS
The study used data from the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) acquired in India, i.e., the fourth round of National Family and Health Survey (2015-16). It is a nationally representative repeated cross-sectional data. Multilevel Parametric Survival Model (MPSM) was employed to assess the influence of contextual correlates on the outcome. The assumption behind this study is that 'individuals' (i.e., level-1) are nested within 'districts' (i.e., level-2), and districts are enclosed within 'states' (i.e., level-3). This suggests that people have varying health conditions, residing in dissimilar communities with different characteristics.
RESULTS RESULTS
Highest under-five mortality i.e., 3.85% are happening among those women whose birth interval is less than two years. In case of parity, around 4% under-five mortality is among women with Third and above order parity. Further, findings from the full model is that ICC values of 1.17 and 0.65% are the correlation of the likelihood of having under-five mortality risk among people residing in the state and district communities, respectively. Besides, the risk of dying was increased alarmingly in the first year of life and slowly to aged 3 years and then it remains steady.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
This study has revealed that both aspects viz. individual and contextual effect of the community are necessary to address the importance variations in under-five mortality in India. In order to ensure substantial reduction in under-five mortality, findings of the study support some policy initiatives that involves the need to think beyond individual level effects and considering contextual characteristics.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38594693
doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15138-4
pii: 10.1186/s12889-023-15138-4
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

991

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Ahmad OB, Lopez AD, Inoue M. The decline in child mortality: a reappraisal. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(10):1175–91.
pubmed: 11100613 pmcid: 2560617
Kumar S, Kumar N, Vivekadhish S. Millennium development goals (MDGs) to sustainable development goals (SDGs): Addressing unfinished agenda and strengthening sustainable development and partnership. Indian J Community Med. 2016;41(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0218.170955 .
doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.170955 pubmed: 26917865 pmcid: 4746946
United Nations Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (UN IGME), ‘Levels & Trends in Child Mortality: Report 2019, Estimates developed by the United Nations Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation’, United Nations Children’s Fund, New York, 2019. https://www.unicef.org/media/60561/file/UN-IGME-child-mortality-report-2019.pdf .
Khodaee GH, Khademi G, Saeidi M. Under-five mortality in the world (1900–2015). Int J Pediatr. 1900;3:1093–5.
Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D, Chu Y, Perin J, Zhu J, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000–15: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the sustainable development goals. Lancet. 2016;388(10063):3027–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31593-8 .
doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31593-8 pubmed: 27839855 pmcid: 5161777
Kazembe L, Clarke A, Kandala NB. Childhood mortality in sub-Saharan Africa: cross-sectional insight into small-scale geographical inequalities from Census data. BMJ Open. 2012;2(5):e001421. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001421 .
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001421 pubmed: 23089207 pmcid: 3488715
Wang H, Liddell CA, Coates MM, Mooney MD, Levitz CE, Schumacher AE, Apfel H, Iannarone M, Phillips B, Lofgren KT, Sandar L. Global, regional, and national levels of neonatal, infant, and under-5 mortality during 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. The Lancet. 2014;384(9947):957–79.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60497-9
IIPS M, Macro OR. National family health survey (NFHS-1), 1992–93: India. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences; 1995.
Roy TK, Arnold F, Kulkarni S, Gupta K, Mishra V, Nangia P. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2), 1998–99. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences; 2000. p. 443.
International Institute for Population Sciences. National family health survey (NFHS-3), 2005–06: India. International Institute for Population Sciences; 2007. https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/frind3/frind3-vol1andvol2.pdf .
IIPS I. India National Family Health Survey NFHS-4 2015–16. Mumbai: IIPS and ICF. 2017.
Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. Ministry of home affairs government of India: sample registration system statistical report 2015. New Delhi, 2016. Available from: https://censusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/SRS_Report_2015/8.Chap%204-Mortality%20Indicators-2015.pdf .
Karim S, Paul K, Chaudhary M, Mukherjee S. Association of morbidity among children with housing, water and sanitation in urban India: a policy perspective. In: Regional development planning and practice. Singapore: Springer; 2022. p. 279–95.
doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-5681-1_11
Kabir R, Farag M, Lim HJ, Geda N, Feng C. Socio-demographic and environmental risk factors associated with multiple under-five child loss among mothers in Bangladesh. BMC Pediatr. 2021;21(1):1–9.
doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-03034-y
Jayathilaka R, Adikari H, Liyanage R, Udalagama R, Wanigarathna N. Cherish your children: socio-economic and demographic characteristics associated with child mortality. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1–4.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11276-9
Devi M, Karol S. Socio-economic determinants of health outcomes in India. Available from:  https://www.ijramr.com/sites/default/files/issues-pdf/3781.pdf .
Srivastava S, Upadhyay SK, Chauhan S, Alagarajan M. Preceding child survival status and its effect on infant and child mortality in India: an evidence from national family health survey 2015–16. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1–2.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11569-z pubmed: 33388037 pmcid: 7777388
Ram SS, Ram B, Yadav A. The effects of maternal age on neonatal and post-neonatal mortality in India: roles of socioeconomic and biodemographic factors. Can Stud Popul. 2021;48(1):59–89.
doi: 10.1007/s42650-021-00041-3
Chandrasekhar S. Infant mortality, population growth and family planning in India: an essay on population problems and international tensions. Routledge; 2012. https://books.google.co.in/books/about/Infant_Mortality_Population_Growth_and_F.html?id=wVa8bkhdEtkC&redir_esc=y .
Ronsmans C. Birth spacing and child survival in rural Senegal. Int J Epidemiol. 1996;25(5):989–97.
doi: 10.1093/ije/25.5.989 pubmed: 8921485
Rubayet S, Shahidullah M, Hossain A, Corbett E, Moran AC, Mannan I, Matin Z, Wall SN, Pfitzer A, Mannan I, Syed U. Newborn survival in Bangladesh: a decade of change and future implications. Health Policy Plann. 2012;27(suppl_3):iii40-56.
doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs044
Siddiqi A, Irwin LG, Hertzman C. The total environment assessment model of early child development. Vancouver: Organización Mundial de la Salud; 2007.
Ferede T. Multilevel modelling of modern contraceptive use among rural and urban population of Ethiopia. Am J Math Stat. 2013;3(1):1–6.
Pickett KE, Pearl M. Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: a critical review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001;55(2):111–22.
doi: 10.1136/jech.55.2.111 pubmed: 11154250 pmcid: 1731829
Stephenson R, Baschieri A, Clements S, Hennink M, Madise N. Contextual influences on the use of health facilities for childbirth in Africa. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(1):84–93.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.057422 pubmed: 16317204 pmcid: 1470452
Sear R, Steele F, McGregor IA, Mace R. The effects of kin on child mortality in rural Gambia. Demography. 2002;39(1):43–63.
doi: 10.1353/dem.2002.0010 pubmed: 11852839
Antai D. Regional inequalities in under-5 mortality in Nigeria: a population-based analysis of individual-and community-level determinants. Popul Health Metrics. 2011;9(1):1.
doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-9-6
Singh A, Pallikadavath S, Ram F, Alagarajan M. Do antenatal care interventions improve neonatal survival in India? Health Policy Plan. 2014;29(7):842–8.
doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt066 pubmed: 24038077
Getachew Y, Bekele S. Survival analysis of under-five mortality of children and its associated risk factors in Ethiopia. J Biosens Bioelectron. 2016;7(213):2.
Wight RG, Cummings JR, Miller-Martinez D, Karlamangla AS, Seeman TE, Aneshensel CS. A multilevel analysis of urban neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and health in late life. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66(4):862–72.
doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.002 pubmed: 18160194
Uthman OA. A multilevel analysis of individual and community effect on chronic childhood malnutrition in rural Nigeria. J Trop Pediatr. 2009;55(2):109–15.
doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmn093 pubmed: 18845589
Major JM, Doubeni CA, Freedman ND, Park Y, Lian M, Hollenbeck AR, Schatzkin A, Graubard BI, Sinha R. Neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation and mortality: NIH-AARP diet and health study. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(11): e15538.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015538 pubmed: 21124858 pmcid: 2990774
Turney K, Harknett K. Neighborhood disadvantage, residential stability, and perceptions of instrumental support among new mothers. J Fam Issues. 2010;31(4):499–524.
doi: 10.1177/0192513X09347992 pubmed: 22102766 pmcid: 3217243
Harttgen K, Misselhorn M. A multilevel approach to explain child mortality and undernutrition in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. IAI Discussion Papers; 2006. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/27442/1/52118052X.PDF .
Boco AG. Individual and Community Level Effects on Child Mortality: An Analysis of 28 Demographic and Health Surveys in Sub-Saharan Africa DHS Working Papers. Calverton: 2010. https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/WP73/WP73.pdf .
Antai D. Inequalities in under-5 mortality in Nigeria: do ethnicity and socioeconomic position matter? J Epidemiol. 2011;21(1):13–20.
doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20100049 pubmed: 20877142 pmcid: 3899512
Whitworth A, Stephenson R. Birth spacing, sibling rivalry and child mortality in India. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55(12):2107–19.
doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00002-3 pubmed: 12409124
Stock R. Distance and the utilization of health facilities in rural Nigeria. Soc Sci Med. 1983;17(9):563–70.
doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(83)90298-8 pubmed: 6879255
Adetunji JA. Infant mortality and mother’s education in Ondo State. Nigeria Soc Sci Med. 1995;40(2):253–63.
doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)E0067-3 pubmed: 7899937
Ladusingh L, Singh CH. Place, community education, gender and child mortality in North-east India. Popul Space Place. 2006;12(1):65–76.
doi: 10.1002/psp.393
Pradhan M, Sahn DE, Younger SD. Decomposing world health inequality. J Health Econ. 2003;22(2):271–93.
doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(02)00123-6 pubmed: 12606146
Say L, Raine R. A systematic review of inequalities in the use of maternal health care in developing countries: examining the scale of the problem and the importance of context. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85:812–9.
doi: 10.2471/BLT.06.035659 pubmed: 18038064 pmcid: 2636485
Tran NK, Goldstein ND, Welles SL. Bias Adjustment Techniques Are Underutilized in HIV Sexual Risk Estimation: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(8):1696. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15081696 .

Auteurs

Ajit Kumar Jaiswal (AK)

, Mumbai, India. ajitjaiswal20@gmail.com.
Department of Fertility and Social demography, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India. ajitjaiswal20@gmail.com.

Manoj Alagarajan (M)

Department of Fertility and Social demography, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.

Wahengbam Bigyananda Meitei (WB)

Department of Public Health and Mortality Studies, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.

Classifications MeSH